Does Two-Step Infusion Improve the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Target Attainment of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients?

The optimal method for administering meropenem remains controversial. This study was conducted to explore the optimal two-step infusion strategy (TIT), and to investigate whether TIT is superior to intermittent infusion therapy (IIT) and prolonged infusion therapy (PIT). A physiologically based pharmacokinetics model for critically ill patients was established and evaluated. The validated model was utilized to evaluate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment of meropenem. The PK/PD target attainment of different TITs varied greatly, and the total infusion duration and the first-step dose greatly affected these values. The optimal TIT was 0.25 g (30 min) + 0.75 g (150 min) at MICs of ≤2 mg/L, and 0.25 g (45 min) + 0.75 g (255 min) at MICs of 4-8 mg/L. The PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT, PIT, and IIT were 100 % at MICs of ≤1 mg/L. When MIC increased to 2-8 mg/L, the PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT was similar to that of PIT and higher than IIT. In conclusion, TIT did not significantly improve the PK/PD target attainment of meropenem compared with PIT. IIT is adequate at MICs of ≤1 mg/L, and PIT may be the optimal meropenem infusion method in critically ill patients with MICs of 2-8 mg/L.

Chen J ，Wang Q ，Li S ，Han R ，Wang C ，Cheng S ，Yang B ，Diao L ，Yang T ，Sun D ，Zhang D ，Dong Y ，Wang T ... -  《-》

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients: How to Achieve Best Dosage Regimen According to the Clinical Situation.

Meropenem is frequently used for the treatment of severe bacterial infections in critically ill patients. Because critically ill patients are more prone to pharmacokinetic variability than other patients, ensuring an effective blood concentration can be complex. Therefore, describing this variability to ensure a proper use of this antibiotic drug limits the rise and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance, and helps preserve the current antibiotic arsenal. The aims of this study were to describe the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients, to identify and quantify the patients' characteristics responsible for the observed pharmacokinetic variability, and to perform different dosing simulations in order to determine optimal individually adapted dosing regimens. A total of 58 patients hospitalized in the medical intensive care unit and receiving meropenem were enrolled, including 26 patients with renal replacement therapy. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed (using NONMEM software) and Monte Carlo simulations were performed with different dosing scenarios (bolus-like, extended, and continuous infusion) exploring the impact of clinical categories of residual diuresis (anuria, oliguria, and preserved diuresis) on the probability of target attainment (MIC: 1-45 mg/L). The population pharmacokinetic model included five covariates with a significant impact on clearance: glomerular filtration rate, dialysis (continuous and semi-continuous), renal function status, and volume of residual diuresis. The clearance for a typical patient in our population is 4.20 L/h and volume of distribution approximately 44 L. Performed dosing regimen simulations suggested that, for equivalent doses, the continuous infusion mode (with loading dose) allowed the obtaining of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target for a larger number of patients (100% for MIC ≤ 20 mg/L). Nevertheless, for the treatment of susceptible bacteria (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L), differences in the probability of target attainment between bolus-like, extended, and continuous infusions were negligible. Identified covariates in the model are easily accessible information in patient health records. The model highlighted the importance of considering the patient's overall condition (renal function and dialysis) and the pathogen's characteristics (MIC target) during the establishment of a patient's dosing regimen.

O'Jeanson A ，Larcher R ，Le Souder C ，Djebli N ，Khier S ... -  《-》

Development of a dosing algorithm for meropenem in critically ill patients based on a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis.

Effective antibiotic dosing is vital for therapeutic success in critically ill patients. This work aimed to develop an algorithm to identify appropriate meropenem dosing in critically ill patients. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling was performed in NONMEM®7.3 based on densely sampled meropenem serum samples (npatients = 48; nsamples = 1376) and included a systematic analysis of 27 pre-selected covariates to identify factors influencing meropenem exposure. Using Monte Carlo simulations newly considering the uncertainty of PK parameter estimates, standard meropenem dosing was evaluated with respect to attainment of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target and was compared with alternative infusion regimens (short-term, prolonged, continuous; daily dose, 2000-6000 mg). Subsequently, a dosing algorithm was developed to identify appropriate dosing regimens. The two-compartment population PK model included three factors influencing meropenem pharmacokinetics: the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CLCRCG) on meropenem clearance; and body weight and albumin on the central and peripheral volume of distribution, respectively; of these, only CLCRCG was identified as a vital influencing factor on PK/PD target attainment. A three-level dosing algorithm was developed (considering PK parameter uncertainty), suggesting dosing regimens depending on renal function and the level (L) of knowledge about the infecting pathogen (L1, pathogen unknown; L2, pathogen known; L3(-MIC), pathogen and susceptibility known; L3(+MIC), MIC known). Whereas patients with higher CLCRCG and lower pathogen susceptibility required mainly intensified dosing regimens, lower than standard doses appeared sufficient for highly susceptible pathogens. In conclusion, a versatile meropenem dosing algorithm for critically ill patients is proposed, indicating appropriate dosing regimens based on patient- and pathogen-specific information.

Ehmann L ，Zoller M ，Minichmayr IK ，Scharf C ，Huisinga W ，Zander J ，Kloft C ... -  《-》

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of meropenem in critically ill patients.

This study aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model (PBPK/PD) of meropenem for critically ill patients. A PBPK model of meropenem in healthy adults was established using PK-Sim software and subsequently extrapolated to critically ill patients based on anatomic and physiological parameters. The mean fold error (MFE) and geometric mean fold error (GMFE) methods were used to compare the differences between predicted and observed values of pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-∞, and CL to evaluate the accuracy of the PBPK model. The model was verified using meropenem plasma samples obtained from Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, which were determined by HPLC-MS/MS. After that, the PBPK model was combined with a PKPD model, which was developed based on f%T > MIC. Monte Carlo simulation was utilized to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) in patients. The developed PBPK model successfully predicted the meropenem disposition in critically ill patients, wherein the MFE average and GMFE of all predicted PK parameters were within the 1.25-fold error range. The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of meropenem was conducted with 92 blood samples from 31 ICU patients, of which 71 (77.17%) blood samples were consistent with the simulated value. The TDM results showed that meropenem PBPK modeling is well simulated in critically ill patients. Monte Carlo simulations showed that extended infusion and frequent administration were necessary to achieve curative effect for critically ill patients, whereas excessive infusion time (> 4 h) was unnecessary. The PBPK/PD modeling incorporating literature and prospective study data can predict meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients correctly. Our study provides a reference for dose adjustment in critically ill patients.

Yang Y ，Wang Y ，Zeng W ，Zhou J ，Xu M ，Lan Y ，Liu L ，Shen J ，Zhang C ，He Q ... -  《Scientific Reports》

OTAC: Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy in Critically ill Patients. Using beta-lactam antibiotics by continuous infusion.

To determine the percentage of patients given standard doses of piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem by continuous  infusion who achieved the target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic  (PK/PD) index, which was defined as free concentrations four times  more than the minimum inhibitory concentration (CMI) for 100% of the  dosing interval (100% fT≥ 4 x MIC). Preliminary data from a larger prospective clinical study  analysing the PK/PD behaviour of β-lactams antibiotics continuous  infusion (CI) in critical patients. The study was conducted in the  intensive care units of a tertiary university hospital for adults (June  2015-May 2017). Inclusion criteria: normal renal function (glomerular  renal function (GFR) CKD-EPI formula ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and  treatment with standard dose β-lactams CI. Concentrations at steady  state (Css) conditions were determined using UHPLC-MS/MS. We  selected the highest susceptible MIC for all likely organisms according to  European Commitee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing's (i.e.  piperacillin/tazobactam: 8 mg/L for enterobacteriaceae and 16 mg/L for  Pseudomonas aeruginosa; meropenem: 2 mg/L for any  microorganism). In addition, a subanalysis of patients was conducted using actual MIC values. 61 patients were enrolled (25 to meropenem and 36 to  piperacillin/tazobactam). Average age was 59 (15) years and median  GFR rate was 95 mL/min/1.73 m2 (83-115). Median meropenem and  piperacillin free concentrations were 16 mg/L (11-29) and 40 mg/L (21- 51), respectively. 88% of patients treated with meropenem reached the  PK/PD target, without differences between both microorganisms. For  piperacillin/tazobactam, 61% and 11% of patients reached the target,  with enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas as suspected  microorganisms, respectively. The pathogen was isolated in 35 (57%)  patients: 94% reached the target PK/PD, without differences between  both antibiotic therapies. Standard doses of meropenem CI are sufficient to  achieve a PK/PD target of 100% fT≥ 4 x MIC in suspected infections  with high MICs (Pseudomonas aeruginosa or enterobacteriaceae).  However, higher doses of piperacillin/tazobactam could be considered to  achieve this goal. In patients with isolated microorganisms, a  standard dose of both antibiotic therapies would be sufficient to achieve  the target. Therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended for  therapeutic optimization.

Esteve-Pitarch E ，Padullés-Zamora A ，Maisterra-Santos K ，Colom-Codina H ，Cobo-Sacristán S ... -  《-》