Validation, Reliability, and Clinical Significance of the Arabic Version of Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire.

Clinically relevant fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients significantly affects their quality of life. Almost all studies have assessed fatigue in this population using non-specific scales. The present multi-centric study aimed to assess the validity, reliability, and clinical significance of the Arabic version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ). The present cross-sectional multicentric study was conducted at Aswan, Mansoura, Port Said, and Al-Azhar University Hospitals over a 6-month duration. The study included 311 patients with RA diagnosed according to the 2010 criteria of the American College of Rheumatology. The Arabic version of BRAF-MDQ was developed to assess fatigue in these patients. All patients were subjected to careful history taking, thorough clinical assessment, and standard laboratory work-up. The obtained Arabic BRAF-MDQ was tested for construct validity, internal consistency, testretest reproducibility, and criterion validity. Construct validity was evaluated using factor analysis with the Kaiser Meyer Olkin tool of sampling adequacy and Bartlett's sphericity test. Internal consistency of subscales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reproducibility was assessed after a 1-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to correlate numerical variables. Predictors of fatigue were identified using binary logistic regression analysis. The present study included 311 RA patients. Construct validity assessment showed a high loading of questionnaire items within the proposed construct subscales with a KMO measure of sphericity of 0.927 and Bartlett's test of sphericity p-value < 0.001. Internal consistency assessment showed adequate Cronbach's alpha of Arabic BRAF-MDQ subscales. Total Arabic BRAFMDQ had excellent criterion validity, as indicated by the high correlations with MAFS (r=0.95, p < 0.001) and SF-36 vitality subscale (r=-0.91, p < 0.001). Clinically significant fatigue was identified in 214 patients (68.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age (OR (95% CI): 1.07 (1.02-1.12), p < 0.001), disease duration (OR (95% CI): 1.82 (1.43-2.33), p < 0.001), DAS28CRP (OR (95% CI): 8.62 (4.63-16.02), p < 0.001), and mHAQ (OR (95% CI): 3.85 (1.07-13.9), p = 0 .039) as significant predictors of fatigue development in the studied patients. The Arabic version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire is a valid, consistent, and reliable tool for the assessment of fatigue in Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clinically significant fatigue was identified in 214 patients (68.8%). Further, risk factors for fatigue included older age, longer disease duration, and higher disease activity.

Aglan L ，Kamal M ，Mokhtar M ，Abdelrahman EK ，Gaafar SM ... -  《-》

Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire.

Sari F ，Oskay D ，Tufan A 《-》

Validation of the Danish versions of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaires (BRAFs).

Primdahl J ，Esbensen BA ，Pedersen AK ，Bech B ，de Thurah A ... -  《-》

Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study to evaluate the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional questionnaire, visual analog scales, and numerical rating scales.

Current patient-reported outcome measures of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have limitations, providing only a global perspective. This study constructed a questionnaire (the Bristol RA Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire [BRAF-MDQ]) from 45 preliminary questions derived from analysis of patient interviews and surveys and explored its structure for fatigue dimensions. The BRAF-MDQ and short BRAF numerical rating scales (NRS) and visual analog scales (VAS) for severity, effect, and ability to cope with fatigue were evaluated for validity. Two hundred twenty-nine RA patients with fatigue (VAS score ≥5 of 10) completed preliminary BRAF and comparator fatigue scales. Iterative analyses informed item removal or retention in the BRAF-MDQ and identification of subscales (using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and factor analysis to identify dimensions). The BRAF-MDQ and short scales were tested in relation to potentially associated variables for criterion and construct validity (Spearman's correlation). The 20-item BRAF-MDQ had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.932), criterion validity (correlation with other fatigue scales: r = 0.643-0.813), and construct validity (correlations with disability, mood, helplessness, and pain: r = 0.340-0.627). Factor analysis showed 4 distinct dimensions (physical fatigue, living with fatigue, cognition fatigue, and emotional fatigue), which correlated well with the RA Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue scale (r = 0.548-0.834). The BRAF VAS and NRS showed similar criterion and construct validity. The BRAF instruments include standardized NRS and VAS for fatigue severity, effect, and coping, are RA specific, and have evidence to support validity. The BRAF-MDQ uniquely measures 4 separate dimensions, which may facilitate development of individually-tailored fatigue management programs.

Nicklin J ，Cramp F ，Kirwan J ，Greenwood R ，Urban M ，Hewlett S ... -  《-》

The revised Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue measures and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease scale: validation in six countries.

To evaluate the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multidimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ), the revised Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Numerical Rating Scales (BRAF-NRS V2) and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) scale in six countries. We surveyed RA patients in France, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the UK, including the HAQ, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and potential revisions of the BRAF-NRS coping and Spanish RAID coping items. Factor structure and internal consistency were examined by factor analysis and Cronbach's α and construct validity by Spearman's correlation. A total of 1276 patients participated (76% female, 25% with a disease duration <5 years, median HAQ 1.0). The original BRAF-MDQ four-factor structure and RAID single-factor structure were confirmed in every country with ⩾66% of variation in items explained by each factor and all item factor loadings of 0.71-0.98. Internal consistency for the BRAF-MDQ total and subscales was a Cronbach's α of 0.75-0.96 and for RAID, 0.93-0.96. Fatigue construct validity was shown for the BRAF-MDQ and BRAF-NRS severity and effect scales, correlated internally with SF-36 vitality and with RAID fatigue (r = 0.63-0.93). Broader construct validity for the BRAFs and RAID was shown by correlation with each other, HAQ and SF-36 domains (r = 0.46-0.82), with similar patterns in individual countries. The revised BRAF-NRS V2 Coping item had stronger validity than the original in all analyses. The revised Spanish RAID coping item performed as well as the original. Across six European countries, the BRAF-MDQ identifies the same four aspects of fatigue, and along with the RAID, shows strong factor structure and internal consistency and moderate-good construct validity. The revised BRAF-NRS V2 shows improved construct validity and replaces the original.

Hewlett S ，Kirwan J ，Bode C ，Cramp F ，Carmona L ，Dures E ，Englbrecht M ，Fransen J ，Greenwood R ，Hagel S ，van de Laar M ，Molto A ，Nicklin J ，Petersson IF ，Redondo M ，Schett G ，Gossec L ... -  《-》