Complete blood count derived inflammation indexes predict outcome in COVID-19 patients: a study in Indonesia.
Inflammation plays a vital role in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. Complete blood count (CBC) is a routine test performed on patients. It provides information regarding the inflammatory process and can be used as a predictor of outcome. This study aimed to explore the correlation between different complete blood count (CBC)-derived inflammation indexes at hospital admission, such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte × platelet ratio (NLPR), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), to in-hospital mortality in confirmed COVID-19 patients.
A retrospective observational study was performed at Ulin Referral Hospital of South Kalimantan with 445 COVID-19 patients from April to November 2020. The patients were divided into two groups, non-survivor and survivor. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-off values. Bivariate analysis was performed using the Chi Square test, the risk ratio was calculated, and logistics regression was determined.
Increase of NLR, dNLR, PLR, MLR, NLPR, MLR, AISI, SIRI, and SII from cut-off values were significantly correlated with patient survival outcome. The cut off values were 6.90, 4.10, 295, 0.42, 0.037, 1,422, 1.80, and 2,504 respectively. NLPR was dominant in predicting in-hospital mortality (OR: 6.668, p = 0.000) with a 28.1% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity.
CBC-derived inflammation indexes were associated with the survival outcome of confirmed COVID-19 patients and NLPR was a dominant variable.
Haryati H
,Wicaksono B
,Syahadatina M
《Journal of Infection in Developing Countries》
Correlation between novel inflammatory markers and carotid atherosclerosis: A retrospective case-control study.
Carotid atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, which is a major cause of ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between carotid atherosclerosis and novel inflammatory markers, including platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet to neutrophil ratio (PNR), neutrophil to lymphocyte platelet ratio (NLPR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), in order to find the best inflammatory predictor of carotid atherosclerosis.
We included 10015 patients who underwent routine physical examinations at the physical examination center of our hospital from January 2016 to December 2019, among whom 1910 were diagnosed with carotid atherosclerosis. The relationship between novel inflammatory markers and carotid atherosclerosis was analyzed by logistic regression, and the effectiveness of each factor in predicting carotid atherosclerosis was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC).
The level of PLR, LMR and PNR in the carotid atherosclerosis group were lower than those in the non-carotid atherosclerosis group, while NLR, NLPR, SII, SIRI and AISI in the carotid atherosclerosis group were significantly higher than those in the non-carotid atherosclerosis group. Logistic regression analysis showed that PLR, NLR, LMR, PNR, NLPR, SII, SIRI, AISI were all correlated with carotid atherosclerosis. The AUC value of NLPR was the highest, which was 0.67, the cut-off value was 0.78, the sensitivity was 65.8%, and the specificity was 57.3%. The prevalence rate of carotid atherosclerosis was 12.4% below the cut-off, 26.6% higher than the cut-off, and the prevalence rate increased by 114.5%.
New inflammatory markers were significantly correlated with carotid atherosclerosis, among which NLPR was the optimum inflammatory marker to predict the risk of carotid atherosclerosis.
Liao M
,Liu L
,Bai L
,Wang R
,Liu Y
,Zhang L
,Han J
,Li Y
,Qi B
... -
《PLoS One》
The systemic inflammation indexes after admission predict in-hospital mortality in patients with extensive burns.
To explore the clinical value of various complete blood count (CBC)-derived inflammation indicators to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with extensive burns.
Systemic inflammation indexes, including lymphocyte-platelet ratio (LPR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte * platelet (NLPR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) on days 1, 3, and 7 after admission were calculated in 135 patients with extensive burns.
We included 135 patients with extensive burns, including 97 survivors and 38 non-survivors. After adjusting for confounders, only the LPR on day 1, NLPR on days 3 and 7 were significantly associated with survival (OR= 1.237, 1.097, 1.104; 95 % CI: 1.055-1.451, 1.002-1.202, 1.005-1.212; respectively) in the analysis of multivariate logistic regression. The optimum cutoff values of the LPR on day 1 and NLPR on day 3 were 6.37 and 8.06, and the area under the curves (AUC) were 0.695 and 0.794, respectively. The AUC of NLPR on day 7 had the highest value, 0.814, and the optimum cut-off value was 3.84. The efficacy of LPR on day 1, NLPR on days 3 and 7 combined with the burn prognostic score index in predicting the prognosis of patients was higher than that of the burn index alone, and the three composite inflammatory indexes combined with PBI had the highest efficacy in predicting the prognosis (AUC = 0.994). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed poor prognosis in patients with higher LPR on day 1 and higher NLPR on days 3 and 7 (log-rank χ2 =9.623,31.564, 20.771, respectively; P < 0.01).
LPR on day 1 and NLPR on days 3 and 7 after admission are reliable predictors of prognosis in patients with severe extensive burns. The combination of the burn prognostic score index, LPR on day 1, and NLPR on days 3 and 7 was superior to the burn indexes alone in predicting a patient's prognosis.
Li F
,He Q
,Peng H
,Zhou J
,Zhong C
,Liang G
,Li W
,Xu D
... -
《-》