Combination of metronomic capecitabine and letrozole in metastatic hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial.

Azim HA ，Saleh MA ，Essam Eldin P ，Abdelhafeez AAM ，Hassan M ，Kassem L ... -  《-》

Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (Young-PEARL): overall survival analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 2 study.

The phase 2 randomised Young-PEARL study demonstrated that palbociclib plus exemestane with ovarian function suppression significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with capecitabine in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Here, we report results of the protocol-specified secondary endpoint of overall survival. Young-PEARL was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at 14 institutions in South Korea. Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with histologically confirmed hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that recurred or progressed during or after previous tamoxifen treatment, who were aromatase inhibitor naive, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. One previous line of chemotherapy was permitted in the metastatic setting. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using block randomisation (block size of two) stratified by previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer and presence of visceral metastasis, to receive either palbociclib (orally, 125 mg per day on a 3-weeks-on, 1-week off schedule) plus exemestane (orally 25 mg daily) with leuprorelin (subcutaneously 3·75 mg on day 1 of each 28-day cycle) or capecitabine (orally, 1250 mg/m2 twice a day on a 2-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Overall survival was a secondary endpoint. All analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population (ie, included all patients randomly assigned to treatment who had at least one post-baseline CT scan and excluded those who did not receive study medication and who had any major violation of the eligible criteria). Safety was assessed in all patients who received any study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592746, and is now complete. Between June 15, 2016, and Dec 10, 2018, 189 patients were enrolled. 184 patients were randomly assigned to the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group (n=92) or the capecitabine group (n=92), of whom 174 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (n=90 in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and n=84 in the capecitabine group). All patients were female and ethnicity data were not collected. As of data cutoff (Feb 29, 2024), median follow-up was 54·0 months (IQR 34·1-74·4). Median progression-free survival was 19·5 months (90% CI 14·3-22·2) for palbociclib plus endocrine therapy and 14·0 months (11·7-18·7) for capecitabine (hazard ratio 0·74 [90% CI 0·57-0·98]; one-sided log-rank p=0·036). 52 (58%) of 90 patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 48 (57%) of 84 in the capecitabine group died, with a median overall survival of 54·8 months (95% CI 48·9-77·1) in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group versus 57·8 months (46·3-89·2) in the capecitabine group (hazard ratio 1·02 [95% CI 0·69-1·51]; p=0·92). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was neutropenia (59 [64%] of 92 in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group vs 15 [18%] of 85 in the capecitabine group) . No treatment-related deaths occurred. With extended follow-up, palbociclib plus exemestane with ovarian function suppression continued to show a significant benefit in progression-free survival compared with capecitabine in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with tamoxifen; however, no improvement in overall survival was seen. Given the progression-free survival benefit, the upfront use of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy is the preferred option for premenopausal women, although a capecitabine-first strategy might be an alternative treatment strategy for maintaining overall survival in resource-limited settings. Pfizer and Ministry of Health & Welfare, South Korea.

Ahn HK ，Kim JY ，Lee KH ，Kim GM ，Kang SY ，Lee KS ，Kim JH ，Lee KE ，Lee MH ，Kim HJ ，Kim HJ ，Koh SJ ，Park IH ，Sohn J ，Kim SB ，Ahn JS ，Kim S ，Cho H ，Jung KH ，Im SA ，Park YH ，Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) Breast Cancer Committee ... -  《-》

Palbociclib plus exemestane with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus capecitabine in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (KCSG-BR15-10): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.

Endocrine treatment is recommended by clinical guidelines as the preferred treatment option for premenopausal as well as postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. In real-world clinical practice, however, a substantial number of patients are treated with chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the clinical antitumour activity and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy with that of capecitabine chemotherapy in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study was done in 14 academic institutions in South Korea. Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that had relapsed or progressed during previous tamoxifen therapy and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were included. One line of previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was allowed. Patients were randomly assigned, using a random permuted block design (with a block size of two), to receive palbociclib plus combination endocrine therapy (oral exemestane 25 mg per day for 28 days and oral palbociclib 125 mg per day for 21 days every 4 weeks plus leuprolide 3·75 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy (oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks every 3 weeks). Randomisation was stratified by previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer and visceral metastasis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. All analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat population that excluded patients who did not receive study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592746, and is ongoing for follow-up of overall survival. Between June 15, 2016, and Dec 10, 2018, 189 patients were enrolled, of whom 184 were randomly assigned to the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group (n=92) or the capecitabine group (n=92). Six patients in the capecitabine group withdrew from the study before drug administration; therefore, 92 patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 86 patients in the capecitabine group were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses. 46 (50%) of 92 patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 45 (51%) of 92 in the capecitabine group were treatment naive for metastatic breast cancer. During a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 9-22), median progression-free survival was 20·1 months (95% CI 14·2-21·8) in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group versus 14·4 months (12·1-17·0) in the capecitabine group (hazard ratio 0·659 [95% CI 0·437-0·994], one-sided log-rank p=0·0235). Treatment-related grade 3 or worse neutropenia was more common in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group than in the capecitabine group (69 [75%] of 92 vs 14 [16%] of 86 patients). 2 (2%) patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 15 (17%) patients in the capecitabine group had treatment-related serious adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian function suppression showed clinical benefit compared with capecitabine in terms of improved progression-free survival in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Palbociclib plus exemestane with ovarian suppression is an active treatment option in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who have been pretreated with tamoxifen. Pfizer, Shinpoong, and Daewoong Korea and Takeda.

Park YH ，Kim TY ，Kim GM ，Kang SY ，Park IH ，Kim JH ，Lee KE ，Ahn HK ，Lee MH ，Kim HJ ，Kim HJ ，Lee JI ，Koh SJ ，Kim JY ，Lee KH ，Sohn J ，Kim SB ，Ahn JS ，Im YH ，Jung KH ，Im SA ，Korean Cancer Study Group (KCSG) ... -  《-》

Palbociclib in Combination with either Aromatase Inhibitors or Fulvestrant for Patients with Advanced HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer in Germany: Final Results of the Phase 2 Multicohort INGE-B Trial.

The INGE-B trial (NCT02894398) aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety data from the PALOMA trials for patients treated first line (1L) with palbociclib (PAL) and letrozole or 1L and later line with PAL and fulvestrant. In addition, so far lacking evidence for efficacy and safety on the combination of PAL with anastrozole, exemestane (1L), or letrozole (later line) was investigated. The prospective, multicenter, multicohort phase 2 trial INGE-B enrolled adult patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Germany. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) in patients with measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Between 2016 and 2018, 388 patients were enrolled at 64 German sites. Among patients with measurable disease treated with PAL in 1L (n = 157), the CBR was 63.7% (100/157). Among all patients treated with PAL 1L (n = 219), PFS was 20.1 months (95% CI 14.6-24.0), and OS was 40.9 months (95% CI 35.1-49.2). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (33.4% n = 77). There were no treatment-related deaths. The INGE-B trial demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability of PAL with letrozole (1L) or fulvestrant (first and later line) in accordance with the PALOMA trials. In addition, the so far lacking proof of efficacy and safety of PAL in combination with anastrozole or exemestane in 1L and with letrozole in later line was provided by INGE-B. The INGE-B trial (NCT02894398) aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety data from the PALOMA trials for patients treated first line (1L) with palbociclib (PAL) and letrozole or 1L and later line with PAL and fulvestrant. In addition, so far lacking evidence for efficacy and safety on the combination of PAL with anastrozole, exemestane (1L), or letrozole (later line) was investigated. The prospective, multicenter, multicohort phase 2 trial INGE-B enrolled adult patients with locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Germany. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) in patients with measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Between 2016 and 2018, 388 patients were enrolled at 64 German sites. Among patients with measurable disease treated with PAL in 1L (n = 157), the CBR was 63.7% (100/157). Among all patients treated with PAL 1L (n = 219), PFS was 20.1 months (95% CI 14.6-24.0), and OS was 40.9 months (95% CI 35.1-49.2). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (33.4% n = 77). There were no treatment-related deaths. The INGE-B trial demonstrated good efficacy and tolerability of PAL with letrozole (1L) or fulvestrant (first and later line) in accordance with the PALOMA trials. In addition, the so far lacking proof of efficacy and safety of PAL in combination with anastrozole or exemestane in 1L and with letrozole in later line was provided by INGE-B.

Welslau M ，Potthoff K ，Zaiss M ，Müller L ，Brucker C ，Salat C ，Untch M ，Meiler J ，Lüftner D ，Welt A ，Dörfel S ，Hagen V ，Stein A ，Liersch R ，Kuhn T ，Siebenbach HU ，Bing G ，Vannier C ，Marschner N ，Gratzke K ... -  《-》

Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3.

In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy. In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3. MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival was an exploratory endpoint. A total of 493 women were randomized 2 : 1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease, there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% confidence interval 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and chemotherapy-free survival numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed. Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (intent-to-treat population: 13.1 months; subgroup with visceral disease: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2- ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached.

Goetz MP ，Toi M ，Huober J ，Sohn J ，Trédan O ，Park IH ，Campone M ，Chen SC ，Manso LM ，Paluch-Shimon S ，Freedman OC ，O'Shaughnessy J ，Pivot X ，Tolaney SM ，Hurvitz SA ，Llombart-Cussac A ，André V ，Saha A ，van Hal G ，Shahir A ，Iwata H ，Johnston SRD ... -  《-》