High expression of SLC7A1 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer promotes tumor progression and is involved in MAPK/ERK pathway and EMT.

Our previous studies have shown that upregulation of SLC7A1 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) tumor cells significantly increases cancer cell proliferation, migration, and cisplatin resistance; however, the molecular mechanism by which SLC7A1 functions in EOC remains unknown. In later studies, we found that SLC7A1 is also highly expressed in the interstitial portion of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), but the significance of this high expression in the interstitial remains unclear. Here, we showed the Interstitial high expression of SLC7A1 in HGSOC by immunohistochemistry. SLC7A1 enriched in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) was upregulated by TGF-β1. Transwell assay, scratch assay, cck8 assay and cell adhesion assay showed that SLC7A1 highly expressed in CAFs promoted tumor cells invasion, migration and metastasis in vitro. The effect of SLC7A1 on MAPK and EMT pathway proteins in ovarian cancer (OC) was verified by RNA sequencing and western blotting. Overexpression of SLC7A1 in OC is involved in MAPK/ ERK pathway and EMT. In general, in HGSOC, CAFs overexpressing SLC7A1 supported the migration and invasion of tumor cells; SLC7A1 is highly expressed in ovarian cancer and is involved in ERK phosphorylation and EMT signaling in MAPK signaling pathway. This suggests that SLC7A1 may be a potential therapeutic target for OC metastasis.

You S ，Han X ，Xu Y ，Sui L ，Song K ，Yao Q ... -  《Cancer Medicine》

Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 increases invasion of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa-associated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma by modifying transforming growth factor-β signalling.

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare genetic skin-blistering disorder that often progresses to metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) at chronic wound sites. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) is a cell-surface proteoglycan that is an oncoantigen in multiple malignancies, where it modulates oncogenic signalling, drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enables cell motility. To evaluate CSPG4 expression and function in RDEB cSCC. RDEB cSCC cell lines were used to assess CSPG4-dependent changes in invasive potential, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1-stimulated signal activation and clinically relevant cytopathology metrics in an in vitro full-thickness tumour model. CSPG4 expression in RDEB cSCC and non-RDEB cSCC tumours was analysed via immunohistochemistry and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq), respectively. Inhibiting CSPG4 expression reduced invasive potential in multiple RDEB cSCC cell lines and altered membrane-proximal TGF-β signal activation via changes in SMAD3 phosphorylation. CSPG4 expression was uniformly localized to basal layer keratinocytes in fibrotic RDEB skin and tumour cells at the tumour-stroma interface at the invasive front in RDEB cSCC tumours in vivo. Analysis of published scRNA-Seq data revealed that CSPG4 expression was correlated with an enhanced EMT transcriptomic signature in cells at the tumour-stroma interface of non-RDEB cSCC tumours. Cytopathological metrics, for example nucleus : cell area ratio, were influenced by CSPG4 expression in in vitro tumour models. We determined that CSPG4 expression in RDEB cSCC cell lines enhanced the invasive potential of tumours. Mechanistically, CSPG4 was found to enhance membrane-proximal TGF-β-stimulated signalling via SMAD3, which is a key mediator of EMT in RDEB cSCC. The implication of these studies is that CSPG4 may represent a therapeutic target that can be leveraged for the clinical management of patients with RDEB cSCC.

Macaulay ARK ，Yang J ，Price MA ，Forster CL ，Riddle MJ ，Ebens CL ，Albert FW ，Giubellino A ，McCarthy JB ，Tolar J ... -  《-》

Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women and a leading cause of death from gynaecological malignancies. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most common type, accounting for around 90% of all ovarian cancers. This specific type of ovarian cancer starts in the surface layer covering the ovary or lining of the fallopian tube. Surgery is performed either before chemotherapy (upfront or primary debulking surgery (PDS)) or in the middle of a course of treatment with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS)), with the aim of removing all visible tumour and achieving no macroscopic residual disease (NMRD). The aim of this review is to investigate the prognostic impact of size of residual disease nodules (RD) in women who received upfront or interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To assess the prognostic impact of residual disease after primary surgery on survival outcomes for advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer. In separate analyses, primary surgery included both upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS). Each residual disease threshold is considered as a separate prognostic factor. We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), MEDLINE via Ovid (to 30 August 2021) and Embase via Ovid (to 30 August 2021). We included survival data from studies of at least 100 women with advanced EOC after primary surgery. Residual disease was assessed as a prognostic factor in multivariate prognostic models. We excluded studies that reported fewer than 100 women, women with concurrent malignancies or studies that only reported unadjusted results. Women were included into two distinct groups: those who received PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy and those who received IDS, analysed separately. We included studies that reported all RD thresholds after surgery, but the main thresholds of interest were microscopic RD (labelled NMRD), RD 0.1 cm to 1 cm (small-volume residual disease (SVRD)) and RD > 1 cm (large-volume residual disease (LVRD)). Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias. Where possible, we synthesised the data in meta-analysis. To assess the adequacy of adjustment factors used in multivariate Cox models, we used the 'adjustment for other prognostic factors' and 'statistical analysis and reporting' domains of the quality in prognosis studies (QUIPS) tool. We also made judgements about the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in the main comparisons, using GRADE. We examined differences between FIGO stages III and IV for different thresholds of RD after primary surgery. We considered factors such as age, grade, length of follow-up, type and experience of surgeon, and type of surgery in the interpretation of any heterogeneity. We also performed sensitivity analyses that distinguished between studies that included NMRD in RD categories of < 1 cm and those that did not. This was applicable to comparisons involving RD < 1 cm with the exception of RD < 1 cm versus NMRD. We evaluated women undergoing PDS and IDS in separate analyses. We found 46 studies reporting multivariate prognostic analyses, including RD as a prognostic factor, which met our inclusion criteria: 22,376 women who underwent PDS and 3697 who underwent IDS, all with varying levels of RD. While we identified a range of different RD thresholds, we mainly report on comparisons that are the focus of a key area of clinical uncertainty (involving NMRD, SVRD and LVRD). The comparison involving any visible disease (RD > 0 cm) and NMRD was also important. SVRD versus NMRD in a PDS setting In PDS studies, most showed an increased risk of death in all RD groups when those with macroscopic RD (MRD) were compared to NMRD. Women who had SVRD after PDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80 to 2.29; I2 = 50%; 17 studies; 9404 participants; moderate-certainty). The analysis of progression-free survival found that women who had SVRD after PDS had nearly twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.16; I2 = 63%; 10 studies; 6596 participants; moderate-certainty). LVRD versus SVRD in a PDS setting When we compared LVRD versus SVRD following surgery, the estimates were attenuated compared to NMRD comparisons. All analyses showed an overall survival benefit in women who had RD < 1 cm after surgery (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32; I2 = 0%; 5 studies; 6000 participants; moderate-certainty). The results were robust to analyses of progression-free survival. SVRD and LVRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting The one study that defined the categories as NMRD, SVRD and LVRD showed that women who had SVRD and LVRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women who had NMRD (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.66; 310 participants; I2 = 56%, and HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.34; 343 participants; I2 = 35%; very low-certainty, for SVRD versus NMRD and LVRD versus NMRD, respectively). LVRD versus SVRD + NMRD in an IDS setting Meta-analysis found that women who had LVRD had a greater risk of death and disease progression compared to women who had either SVRD or NMRD (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.11; 6 studies; 1572 participants; I2 = 58% for overall survival and HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.52; 1145 participants; I2 = 60% for progression-free survival; very low-certainty). However, this result is biased as in all but one study it was not possible to distinguish NMRD within the < 1 cm thresholds. Only one study separated NMRD from SVRD; all others included NMRD in the SVRD group, which may create bias when comparing with LVRD, making interpretation challenging. MRD versus NMRD in an IDS setting Women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had more than twice the risk of death compared to women with NMRD (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.29, I2 = 81%; 906 participants; very low-certainty). In a PDS setting, there is moderate-certainty evidence that the amount of RD after primary surgery is a prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer. We separated our analysis into three distinct categories for the survival outcome including NMRD, SVRD and LVRD. After IDS, there may be only two categories required, although this is based on very low-certainty evidence, as all but one study included NMRD in the SVRD category. The one study that separated NMRD from SVRD showed no improved survival outcome in the SVRD category, compared to LVRD. Further low-certainty evidence also supported restricting to two categories, where women who had any amount of MRD after IDS had a significantly greater risk of death compared to women with NMRD. Therefore, the evidence presented in this review cannot conclude that using three categories applies in an IDS setting (very low-certainty evidence), as was supported for PDS (which has convincing moderate-certainty evidence).

Bryant A ，Hiu S ，Kunonga PT ，Gajjar K ，Craig D ，Vale L ，Winter-Roach BA ，Elattar A ，Naik R ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》

Characterizing the genomic landscape through the lens of FOLR1 status in low and high grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Targeted therapy in folate receptor alpha (FOLR1)-positive high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is now a mainstay for platinum-resistant disease. However, the rate of FOLR1-positivity in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is not well documented. Less common than HGSOC, LGSOC tends to respond poorly to traditional platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimens, particularly in recurrence. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify molecular targets that may assist in identifying more efficacious treatments for LGSOC. In this work, we assessed the genomic and transcriptomic landscapes in FOLR1-positive/negative LGSOC compared to its high-grade counterpart. Using a large precision oncology database, next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry was performed on a cohort of 281 LGSOC and 5086 HGSOC. Associated MAPK activation was calculated based on NGS results and patient survival analysis was completed stratified by molecular alteration. Compared with LGSOC (24.6 %), HGSOC tumors have significantly higher prevalence of FOLR1+ status (43.5 %) and significantly higher PD-L1+ status. Conversely, LGSOC had higher prevalence of KRAS and NRAS mutations, with a near exclusivity for BRAF mutation compared to HGSOC. FOLR1- LGSOC and HGSOC had similar prevalences of T cell-inflamed tumors, though FOLR1+ LGSOC had a significantly lower prevalence of T-Cell inflamed tumors than FOLR1+ HGSOC. MAPK activation, quantified via MAPK activation score (MPAS), was significantly higher in low-grade tumors compared to HGSOC, yet no difference between FOLR1+ vs FOLR1- LGSOC was observed. Though less than in high-grade disease, a notable portion of low-grade tumors were FOLR1+, suggesting FOLR1 expression in LGSOC could be a viable target for this rare histology, particularly in the recurrent setting.

Rushton T ，Krause HB ，Samec T ，Elliott A ，Karnezis AN ，Toboni MD ，Thaker PH ，Braxton DR ，Oberley M ，Gershenson DM ，Armstrong DK ... -  《-》

Characterization of Epithelial-Mesenchymal and Neuroendocrine Differentiation States in Pancreatic and Small Cell Ovarian Tumor Cells and Their Modulation by TGF-β1 and BMP-7.

Ungefroren H ，von der Ohe J ，Braun R ，Gätje Y ，Lapshyna O ，Schrader J ，Lehnert H ，Marquardt JU ，Konukiewitz B ，Hass R ... -  《Cells》