Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in American patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Toripalimab, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin, has been approved as the first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC), representing a significant milestone as the first FDA-approved innovative therapy for this condition. Despite this achievement, there's a lack of data on the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab for RM-NPC patients in the American context. To assess the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, a 3-state partitioned survival model was constructed. The study involved participants with characteristics matching those in the JUPITER-02 trial. Cost and utility inputs were collected from literature. Main outcomes measured were quality-adjusted life year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of results. The study found that the toripalimab regimen resulted in 4.390 QALYs at a cost of $361,813, while the chemotherapy-only regimen yielded 1.685 QALYs at a cost of $161,632. This translates to an ICER of $74,004/QALY, below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated that utility values, discount rate, and the price of toripalimab significantly impact INMB. With an 87.10% probability of being cost-effective at a $150,000/QALY threshold, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis supports toripalimab plus chemotherapy as a viable option. Scenario analysis showed that toripalimab remains cost-effective unless its price increases by 125%. Additionally, a simulated 15-year study period increases the ICER to $88,026/QALY. Subgroup analysis revealed ICERs of $76,538/QALY for PD-L1 positive and $70,158/QALY for PD-L1 negative groups. Toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective alternative to standard chemotherapy for American patients with RM-NPC. This evidence can guide clinical and reimbursement decision-making in treating RM-NPC patients.

Lian D ，Gan Y ，Xiao D ，Xuan D ，Chen Y ，Yang Y ... -  《Cancer Medicine》

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Urothelial carcinoma is a significant health concern in the United States (US), with high mortality and economic burdens. The CheckMate-901 trial showed promising survival benefits for nivolumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by nivolumab maintenance therapy (nivolumab-combination) as first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC), but its cost-effectiveness is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the nivolumab-combination versus standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine-cisplatin) for advanced UC from the perspective of healthcare payers in the US. A model-based pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Based on the CheckMate-901 study, a three-state Markov model (progression-free, progression, and death) was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab-combination versus gemcitabine-cisplatin as a first-line treatment for unresectable or metastatic UC. The model's outputs included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs and were used to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Costs included drug prices, adverse event management, and healthcare resource utilization from a US healthcare payer's perspective. State utilities were derived from published literature. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to test model robustness. Scenario analyses for drug costs in the UK and Australian health systems were performed. Compared with gemcitabine-cisplatin, the nivolumab-combination resulted in an additional 0.416 QALYs at an incremental cost of $90,523, yielding an ICER of $217,527 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses indicated significant impacts from the cost of nivolumab maintenance therapy. Compared with gemcitabine-cisplatin, nivolumab-combination therapy is not cost-effective for unresectable or metastatic UC at a $100,000 per QALY threshold. High drug prices in the US significantly impact cost-effectiveness, highlighting the need for price negotiations and healthcare policy adjustments to balance innovation incentives and patient affordability.

Lin J ，Song X ，Fu W ，You C ，Li N ，Liu M ，Cai H ... -  《-》

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant toripalimab for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomised, single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with a high pretreatment plasma concentration of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA remain at high risk for recurrence after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant-adjuvant treatment with the PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab and concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus placebo and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This randomised, single-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre in Guangzhou, China. Adult patients (aged 18-65 years) with newly diagnosed high-risk stage III-IVa locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with a pretreatment plasma EBV DNA concentration of at least 1500 copies per mL and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0-1, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six), stratified by TNM stage (III vs IVa), to neoadjuvant toripalimab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo once every 2 weeks for two cycles, followed by concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 during intensity-modulated radiotherapy and adjuvant toripalimab (240 mg intravenously) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03925090, and is closed to enrolment; follow-up is ongoing. Between Dec 6, 2019, and Dec 9, 2021, 150 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the toripalimab group (n=100) or placebo group (n=50). 115 (77%) patients were male and 35 (23%) were female. As of data cutoff (May 31, 2024), median follow-up for progression-free survival was 37·8 months (IQR 34·2-46·5) for the intention-to-treat population analyses. 2-year progression-free survival was higher in the toripalimab group (92·0% [95% CI 86·7-97·3]) than in the placebo group (74·0% [61·8-86·2]; stratified hazard ratio 0·40 [95% CI 0·18-0·89]; log-rank p=0·019). The most common grade 3 or worse acute adverse events (occurring within 1 year of randomisation) were leukopenia (40 [40%] of 99 patients in the toripalimab group vs 22 [44%] of 50 patients in the placebo group), mucositis (28 [28%] vs ten [20%]), neutropenia (17 [17%] vs nine [18%]), anaemia (16 [16%] vs five [10%]), and weight loss (12 [12%] vs six [12%]). The most common grade 3 or worse late adverse events (occurring >1 year after randomisation) was auditory or hearing loss (eight [8%] vs four [8%]). Immune-mediated adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in ten (10%) patients only in the toripalimab group. One (2%) of 50 patients in the placebo group died due to septic shock caused by bacteraemia considered not treatment related. There were no treatment-related deaths in the toripalimab group. Our findings suggested that a so-called sandwich approach involving toripalimab (in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy could be a highly promising therapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Phase 3 non-inferiority trials are warranted comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant toripalimab versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program, Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai, Postdoctoral Innovative Talent Support Program, Planned Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province, Key Youth Teacher Cultivating Program of Sun Yat-sen University, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Liu SL ，Li XY ，Yang JH ，Wen DX ，Guo SS ，Liu LT ，Li YF ，Luo MJ ，Xie SY ，Liang YJ ，Sun XS ，Yang ZC ，Lv XF ，Luo DH ，Li JB ，Liu Q ，Wang P ，Guo L ，Mo HY ，Sun R ，Yang Q ，Lan KQ ，Jia GD ，Li R ，Zhao C ，Xu RH ，Chen QY ，Tang LQ ，Mai HQ ... -  《-》

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Fleeman N ，Houten R ，Nevitt S ，Mahon J ，Beale S ，Boland A ，Greenhalgh J ，Edwards K ，Maden M ，Bhattacharyya D ，Chaplin M ，McEntee J ，Chow S ，Waddell T ... -  《-》

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy as first-line therapy for cervical cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis in the US.

Medication is the predominant therapy for advanced cancers. However, the use of novel anticancer medications is a major contributor to disease-related financial hardships. Recently, numerous countries have mandated the pharmacoeconomic assessments of novel oncological agents to mitigate patient financial risks and optimize resource allocation. The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of adding atezolizumab to standard therapy (atezolizumab plus bevacizumab [BC]) for metastatic, persistent, and recurrent cervical cancer from the perspective of US healthcare payers, with the aim of supporting policymaking and promoting the rational use of healthcare resources. Using clinical efficacy and safety data from the BEATcc clinical trial, in addition to cost and utility values from publicly available databases and published literature, a partitioned survival model over a 20-year lifetime horizon was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy (ABC) versus BC. The primary output of the model was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess its robustness. At both 20 and 4.5 y of time horizon, ABC therapy showed poor cost-effectiveness, with ICER of $193926.48/QALY and $168482.26/QALY, respectively, which were higher than the $150,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the price of atezolizumab had the most significant impact on the model results. When the price of atezolizumab was reduced by 10%, ABC changed from being not cost-effective to cost-effective (ICER = $121531.24/QALY). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 32.6% probability that ABC would be cost-effective, which increased to 58.6% when the price of atezolizumab was reduced by 10%. For patients with metastatic, persistent, and recurrent cervical cancer in the US, ABC was not as cost-effective as BC. Appropriate price reduction (10%) is recommended for atezolizumab to improve cost-effectiveness of ABC therapy.

Lin Y ，Li C ，Wang C ，Chen J ，Huang Y ... -  《Frontiers in Immunology》