Real-life effectiveness of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in hepatitis C patients previously treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.

Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is the recommended rescue therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who fail direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Data are limited on the effectiveness of this treatment after the current first-line therapies. Our aim was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX among patients failing sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB). Retrospective multicentre study (26 Spanish hospitals), including chronic hepatitis C patients unsuccessfully treated with SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, and retreated with SOF/VEL/VOX ± ribavirin for 12 weeks between December 2017 and December 2022. In total, 142 patients included: 100 (70.4%) had failed SOF/VEL and 42 (29.6%) GLE/PIB. Patients were mainly men (84.5%), White (93.9%), with hepatitis C virus genotype (GT) 3 (49.6%) and 47.2% had liver cirrhosis. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in 132 patients who completed SOF/VEL/VOX and were followed 12 weeks after end of treatment; 117 (88.6%) achieved SVR. There were no significant differences in SVR rates according to initial DAA treatment (SOF/VEL 87.9% vs. GLE/PIB 90.2%, p = 0.8), cirrhosis (no cirrhosis 90% vs. cirrhosis 87.1%, p = 0.6) or GT3 infection (non-GT3 91.9% vs. GT3 85.5%, p = 0.3). However, when considering the concurrent presence of SOF/VEL treatment, cirrhosis and GT3 infection, SVR rates dropped to 82.8%. Ribavirin was added in 8 (6%) patients, all achieved SVR. SOF/VEL/VOX is an effective rescue therapy for failures to SOF/VEL or GLE/PIB, with an SVR of 88.6%. Factors previously linked to lower SVR rates, such as GT3 infection, cirrhosis and first-line therapy with SOF/VEL were not associated with lower SVRs.

Ruiz-Cobo JC ，Llaneras J ，Forns X ，Gallego Moya A ，Conde Amiel I ，Arencibia A ，Diago M ，García-Samaniego J ，Castellote J ，Llerena S ，Rodríguez-Seguel E ，Mateos B ，Rodríguez M ，Rosales Zabal JM ，Fernández I ，Calleja JL ，Morillas RM ，Montoliu S ，Andrade RJ ，Badia Aranda E ，Hernández-Guerra M ，Maté CJ ，González-Santiago JM ，de Cuenca B ，Bernal-Monterde V ，Delgado M ，Turnes J ，Lens S ，Buti M ... -  《-》

Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for genotype 6 chronic hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6 mainly distributes in Southeast Asia and South China. Because of the low prevalence in developed countries, optimal treatment for HCV genotype 6 in real-world setting remains to be determined. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) for patients with HCV genotype 6 infection in Taiwan. A total of 286 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 6, 161 receiving 12-week SOF/VEL and 125 receiving 8-week GLE/PIB, were enrolled. All patients were followed up for 12 weeks after treatment completion. Demographic information, HCV viral load (VL), profiles of lipid and sugar, and adverse events were recorded and reviewed. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates of SOF/VEL and GLE/PIB evaluated by intention-to-treat analysis were 99.38% and 100%, respectively. SVR achieved 100%, regardless of cirrhosis or viral load (cutoff: 6 MIU/mL), of both regimens by per-protocol analysis. Skin itching was the most common adverse event, with an overall incidence of 6.64% which was more prevalent in GLE/PIB (12.0%) than SOF/VEL (2.48%). A significant decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in patients receiving SOF/VEL but not in those receiving GLE/PIB at the time of SVR. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse event. The high SVR and excellent safety of SOF/VEL and GLE/PIB in real-world setting reveals that the two DAA regimens are favorable options for treatment of HCV genotype 6 in Taiwan and Asia.

Chen JJ ，Chiu YC ，Lee PL ，Tung HD ，Chiu HC ，Chien SC ，Cheng PN ... -  《-》

Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir in patients with chronic hepatitis C previously treated with DAAs.

Around 5% of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection treated with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents do not achieve sustained virological response (SVR). The currently approved retreatment regimen for prior DAA failure is a combination of sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX), although there is little data on its use in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX in the real-world setting. This was a prospective multicentre study assessing the efficacy of retreatment with SOF/VEL/VOX in patients who had experienced a prior DAA treatment failure. The primary endpoint was SVR 12 weeks after the completion of treatment (SVR12). Data on safety and tolerability were also recorded. A total of 137 patients were included: 75% men, 35% with liver cirrhosis. Most were infected with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 3. The most common prior DAA combinations were sofosbuvir plus an NS5A inhibitor or ombitasvir/paritaprevir/r+dasabuvir. A total of 136 (99%) patients achieved undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment. Overall SVR12 was 95% in the 135 patients reaching this point. SVR12 was lower in patients with cirrhosis (89%, p = 0.05) and those with GT3 infection (80%, p <0.001). Patients with GT3 infection and cirrhosis had the lowest SVR12 rate (69%). Of the patients who did not achieve SVR12, 1 was reinfected and 7 experienced treatment failure (6 GT3, 1 GT1a). The presence of resistance-associated substitutions did not impact SVR12. Adverse effects were mild and non-specific. Real-world data show that SOF/VEL/VOX is an effective, safe rescue therapy for patients with prior DAA treatment failure despite the presence of resistance-associated substitutions. However, patients with liver cirrhosis infected by GT3 remain the most-difficult-to-treat group. Treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) for 12 weeks is the current recommendation for the 5% of patients infected with HCV who do not achieve eradication of the virus under treatment with direct-acting antivirals. In a Spanish cohort of 137 patients who failed a previous combination of direct-acting antivirals, a cure rate of 95% was achieved with SOF/VEL/VOX. Genotypic characteristics of the virus (genotype 3) and the presence of cirrhosis were factors that decreased the rate of cure. Treatment with SOF/VEL/VOX is an effective and safe rescue therapy due to its high efficacy and very good safety profile.

Llaneras J ，Riveiro-Barciela M ，Lens S ，Diago M ，Cachero A ，García-Samaniego J ，Conde I ，Arencibia A ，Arenas J ，Gea F ，Torras X ，Luis Calleja J ，Antonio Carrión J ，Fernández I ，María Morillas R ，Rosales JM ，Carmona I ，Fernández-Rodríguez C ，Hernández-Guerra M ，Llerena S ，Bernal V ，Turnes J ，González-Santiago JM ，Montoliu S ，Figueruela B ，Badia E ，Delgado M ，Fernández-Bermejo M ，Iñarrairaegui M ，Pascasio JM ，Esteban R ，Mariño Z ，Buti M ... -  《-》

Real-world effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype-2 infection after completed treatment.

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is a major cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and mortality. Eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) can greatly improve long-term outcomes. Several direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), including sofosbuvir (SOF) plus different NS5A inhibitors, as well as non-SOF-based DAAs, including glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), have been approved for treating CHC genotype-2 (GT-2) patients in Taiwan. However, there is limited real-world effectiveness data regarding these different regimens. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy in CHC GT-2 patients who underwent these DAA regimens. We retrospectively enrolled CHC GT-2 patients who were treated with SOF-based DAAs or GLE/PIB at a single medical center. A total of 704 enrolled patients were treated with either SOF + ribavirin (RBV), SOF/daclatasvir (DCV) ± RBV, SOF/ledipasvir (LDV) ± RBV, SOF/velpatasvir (VEL) ± RBV, or with GLE/PIB. The overall sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 97.9%. The SVR rate was significantly lower in the SOF + RBV group (95.6%) than in the non-SOF + RBV (98.9%) group, especially compared to the SOF/DCV (100%) and GLE/PIB groups (99.5%). Among patients treated with SOF + RBV, cirrhotic patients had significantly lower SVR rates than noncirrhotic patients (89.4% vs 98.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a younger age, hepatitis B virus coinfection, baseline cirrhosis, or those who received SOF + RBV were less likely to achieve SVR. In conclusion, for CHC GT-2 patients, SOF in combination with DCV, LDV, or VEL, as well as GLE/PIB, achieved similar high efficacies, regardless of cirrhosis, treatment experience, or chronic kidney disease status. Therefore, the use of DAA therapy to eradicate HCV should not be delayed in these populations.

Cheng TS ，Liang PC ，Huang CF ，Yeh ML ，Huang CI ，Lin ZY ，Chen SC ，Huang JF ，Dai CY ，Hsieh PH ，Chuang WL ，Yu ML ... -  《-》

Failure on voxilaprevir, velpatasvir, sofosbuvir and efficacy of rescue therapy.

There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients. Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients. Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12. VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients. The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).

Dietz J ，Di Maio VC ，de Salazar A ，Merino D ，Vermehren J ，Paolucci S ，Kremer AE ，Lara M ，Pardo MR ，Zoller H ，Degasperi E ，Peiffer KH ，Sighinolfi L ，Téllez F ，Graf C ，Ghisetti V ，Schreiber J ，Fernández-Fuertes E ，Boglione L ，Muñoz-Medina L ，Stauber R ，Gennari W ，Figueruela B ，Santos J ，Lampertico P ，Zeuzem S ，Ceccherini-Silberstein F ，García F ，Sarrazin C ，HCV Virology Italian Resistance Network (VIRONET-C) collaborators ，Spanish GEHEP-004 Collaborators ，Members of the German HCV resistance study group ... -  《-》