Comparison of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT with 18 F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric and colorectal cancer.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic gastric cancer and colorectal cancer lesions as compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Fifty-nine patients who underwent both 18 F-FDG and 68 Ga-FAPI-04 for initial staging or restaging were enrolled. Histopathological findings and clinical imaging follow-up were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance and TNM staging of the two tracers were calculated and compared. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ), tumour-to-mediastinal blood pool ratio (TBR) (lesions SUV max /ascending aorta SUV mean ), and tumour-to-normal liver parenchyma ratio (TLR) (lesions SUV max /liver SUV mean ) of primary and metastatic lesions between two imaging modalities were measured and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t -test. The two imaging agents are comparable for the detection of primary tumors. The sensitivity of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was higher than that of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for detecting lymph node metastases, peritoneal metastases, liver metastases, and bone metastases. In the patient-based analysis, the TLR for all lesions was significantly higher with 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT than with 18 F-FDG PET/CT (all P  < 0.05). The accuracy (92.2 vs. 70.3%, P  = 0.002) and sensitivity of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 were significantly higher than that of 18 F-FDG (78.6 vs. 71.4%, P  = 0.011) in determining the lymph node status. 68 Ga-FAPI-04 has a higher accuracy in staging ( P  = 0.041), which is mainly due to the ability of distant metastases detection. 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT may be superior in evaluating the diagnostic efficiency and staging accuracy of gastric and colorectal cancer.

Wang B ，Zhao X ，Liu Y ，Zhang Z ，Chen X ，Jing F ，Chen X ，Hua Y ，Zhao J ... -  《-》

Usefulness of [(68)Ga]FAPI-04 and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the detection of primary tumour and metastatic lesions in gastrointestinal carcinoma: a comparative study.

To assess and compare the diagnostic performance of gallium-68-labelled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ([68Ga]FAPI-04) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in gastrointestinal cancer. Fifty-one patients who underwent both [18F]FDG and [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT for initial staging or restaging were enrolled. Histopathological findings, typical radiological appearances, and clinical imaging follow-up were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of the two tracers was calculated and compared. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), tumour-to-mediastinal blood pool ratio (TBR), and tumour-to-liver ratio (TLR) of primary and metastatic lesions were measured and compared between two imaging modalities. In patient-based analysis, [68Ga]FAPI-04 showed much better diagnostic sensitivity than [18F]FDG in detecting primary tumour (94.44% [17/18] vs. 61.11% [11/18]), postoperative recurrence and metastases (95.65% [22/23] vs. 69.57% [16/23]), and peritoneal carcinomatosis (100% [28/28] vs. 60.71% [17/28]) (all p < 0.05). In lesion-based analysis, [68Ga]FAPI-04 showed higher sensitivity than [18F]FDG for detecting lymph node metastases. In peritoneal carcinomatosis, the median SUVmax (12.12 vs. 7.18) and SUVmean (6.84 vs. 4.11) with [68Ga]FAPI-04 were significantly higher than those with [18F]FDG (all p < 0.005). The TBR and TLR of [68Ga]FAPI-04 were significantly higher than those of [18F]FDG for detecting primary tumour, lymph node, liver, and peritoneal metastases (all p < 0.005). Therapeutic management changed in 13 patients according to [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with conventional imaging. [68Ga]FAPI-04 is superior to [18F]FDG PET/CT for detecting primary tumour, postoperative recurrence and metastasis, and peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastrointestinal cancer. • [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity than [18F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary tumour and postoperative recurrence and metastasis in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma. • [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT had obvious advantages over [18F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal carcinoma with a much higher FAPI uptake value, TBR, and TLR. • Although the median SUVmax and SUVmean of [68Ga]FAPI-04 were similar to those of [18F]FDG for the primary tumour, lymph node metastases, and liver metastases in gastrointestinal carcinoma, the TBR and TLR of the SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly higher on [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT, causing the lesions to be displayed more clearly.

Li C ，Tian Y ，Chen J ，Jiang Y ，Xue Z ，Xing D ，Wen B ，He Y ... -  《-》

Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG Uptake in Gastric, Duodenal, and Colorectal Cancers.

Pang Y ，Zhao L ，Luo Z ，Hao B ，Wu H ，Lin Q ，Sun L ，Chen H ... -  《-》

[(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [(18)F]FDG PET/CT.

This study aimed to compare the performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary and metastatic lesions of gastric cancer. Fifty-six patients with histologically proven gastric carcinomas were enrolled in this study, including 45 patients for staging and 11 patients for restaging after surgery. Each patient underwent both [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT within 1 week. The activity of tracer accumulation in lesions was assessed by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and TBR (lesions SUVmax/ascending aorta SUVmean). Histological workup served as a standard of reference. If tissue diagnosis was not applicable, the follow-up data including the results of laboratory tests and medical imaging could also serve as a reference. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT was comparable to [18F]FDG on detecting primary tumors and lymph node (LN) metastases, whereas [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 outperformed [18F]FDG in detecting peritoneal (159 vs. 47, P < 0.001) and bone metastases (64 vs. 55, P = 0.003) by the lesion-based analysis. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 showed higher SUVmax (10.3 vs. 8.1, P = 0.004) and TBR (11.6 vs. 5.8, P < 0.001) in primary tumor, and higher TBR in LN involvement (8.0 vs. 3.7, P < 0.001) and peritoneal metastases (8.1 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001), compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT. The specificity and positive predictive value of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 were significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG (100.0% vs. 97.7%, P < 0.001; 100.0% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.001) in determining the LN status. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 was comparable to [18F]FDG in evaluating N-staging (47.1% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.282). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT detected more positive recurrent lesions in all restaging patients and showed clearer tumor delineation. Two patients underwent follow-up [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans after chemotherapy, which both showed remission. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT can better evaluate primary gastric cancer and metastatic lesions in the peritoneum, abdominal LNs, and bone. Furthermore, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT provided more information for patients with recurrent disease and had the potential in monitoring response to treatment.

Lin R ，Lin Z ，Chen Z ，Zheng S ，Zhang J ，Zang J ，Miao W ... -  《-》

Comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI and [(18)F]FDG uptake in patients with gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

In this study, we investigated the role of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET imaging in the detection of primary and metastatic gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma (GSRCC) and compared with [18F]FDG PET. This retrospective multicenter analysis included 34 patients with histologically confirmed GSRCCs from four medical centers. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), and diagnostic accuracy were compared between the two modalities. [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI uptakes were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. McNemar's test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy between the two techniques. Data were analyzed from 27 paired PET/CT and 7 paired PET/MRI scans for 34 GSRCC patients (16 men and 18 women) who had a median age of 51 years (range: 25-85 years). [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET showed higher SUVmax and TBR values than did [18F]FDG PET in the primary tumors (SUVmax: 5.2 vs. 2.2, p = 0.001; TBR: 7.6 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001), involved lymph nodes (SUVmax: 6.8 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001; TBR: 5.8 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001), and bone and visceral metastases (SUVmax: 6.5 vs. 2.4, p < 0.001; TBR: 6.3 vs. 1.3, p < 0.001). In diagnostic performance, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET exhibited higher sensitivity than [18F]FDG PET for detecting primary tumors (73% [16/22] vs. 18% [4/22], p < 0.001), local recurrences (100% [7/7] vs. 29% [2/7], p = 0.071), lymph node metastases (77% [59/77] vs. 23% [18/77], p < 0.001), and distant metastases (93% [207/222] vs. 39% [86/222], p < 0.001). The results from this multicenter retrospective analysis justify the clinical use of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI tracers for GSRCC diagnosis and staging. • [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT is a promising imaging modality for the detection of primary and metastatic disease and has implications for TNM staging in GSRCC. • In this multicenter study of 34 patients with GSRCC, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET exhibited greater radiotracer uptake, tumor-to-background ratios, and diagnostic accuracy than [18F]FDG PET for detecting primary/recurrent tumors and metastatic lesions.

Chen H ，Pang Y ，Li J ，Kang F ，Xu W ，Meng T ，Shang Q ，Zhao J ，Guan Y ，Wu H ，Xie F ，Wang J ，Sun L ... -  《-》