Care-seeking for difficulties conceiving in sub-Saharan Africa: findings from population-based surveys in eight geographies.
What is the nature of women's care-seeking for difficulties conceiving in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including the correlates of seeking biomedical infertility care at a health facility?
Care-seeking for difficulties getting pregnant was low, much of which involved traditional or religious sources of care, with evidence of sociodemographic disparities in receipt of biomedical care.
Nearly all research on infertility care-seeking patterns in SSA is limited to clinic-based studies among the minority of people in these settings who obtain facility-based services. In the absence of population-based data on infertility care-seeking, we are unable to determine the demand for services and disparities in the use of more effective biomedical sources of care.
We used cross-sectional, population-based data from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) female survey in eight geographies in SSA, including nationally representative data from Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Kenya, and Uganda and regionally representative data from two provinces in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (Kinshasa and Kongo Central) and two states in Nigeria (Kano and Lagos). We employed a multi-stage cluster random sampling design with probability proportional to size selection of clusters within each geography to produce representative samples of women aged 15-49. Samples ranged from 1144 in Kano, Nigeria, to 9489 in Kenya. PMA collected these data between November 2021 and December 2022.
We restricted the sample to women who had ever had sex, with analytic samples ranging from 854 in Kano to 8,059 in Kenya, then conducted descriptive and bivariable analyses to examine characteristics of those who sought care for difficulties getting pregnant. Among those who reported seeking care, we conducted bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to determine factors associated with receipt of biomedical services from a health facility. All analyses were conducted separately by geography.
Our study found low levels of care-seeking for difficulties getting pregnant among sexually active women in eight geographies in SSA, ranging from 3.7% (Kenya) to 15.3% (Côte d'Ivoire). Of this, 51.8% (Burkina Faso) to 86.7% (Kinshasa) involved receipt of biomedical services in health facilities. While many factors were consistently associated with infertility care-seeking from any source across geographies, factors associated with receipt of biomedical care specifically were less pronounced. This may be a result of the highly limited sources of infertility services in SSA; thus, even privileged groups may struggle to obtain effective treatment for difficulties getting pregnant. However, we did observe disparities in biomedical care-seeking in our bivariable results in several geographies, with the wealthiest women, those with more education, and those residing in urban areas generally more likely to have sought biomedical care for difficulties getting pregnant.
Our data lacked details on the nature of the services received and outcomes, and we do not have information on reasons why women chose the sources they did. Small samples of women who sought care limited our power to detect significant differences in care-seeking by women's characteristics in several geographies.
Infertility and access to appropriate treatment are issues of reproductive health and human rights. While our results do not indicate to what extent use of non-biomedical sources of care is driven by preferences, cost, or lack of accessible services, it is clear from our results and existing literature that more needs to be done to ensure access to affordable, quality, cost-effective infertility services in SSA.
This study was supported by grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV009639) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD107172). The funders were not involved in the study design, analyses, manuscript writing, or the decision to publish. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
N/A.
Bell SO
,Larson E
,Bittle D
,Moreau C
,Omoluabi E
,OlaOlorun FM
,Akilimali P
,Kibira SPS
,Makumbi F
,Guiella G
,Mosso R
,Gichangi P
,Anglewicz P
... -
《-》
Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication.
Health communication is an area where changing technologies, particularly digital technologies, have a growing role to play in delivering and exchanging health information between individuals, communities, health systems, and governments.[1] Such innovation has the potential to strengthen health systems and services, with substantial investments in digital health already taking place, particularly in low‐ and middle‐income countries. Communication using mobile phones is an important way of contacting individual people and the public more generally to deliver and exchange health information. Such technologies are used increasingly in this capacity, but poor planning and short‐term projects may be limiting their potential for health improvement. The assumption that mobile devices will solve problems that other forms of communication have not is also prevalent. In this context, understanding people's views and experiences may lead to firmer knowledge on which to build better programs. A qualitative evidence synthesis by Heather Ames and colleagues on clients' perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication focuses on a particular type of messaging – targeted messages from health services delivered to particular group(s) via mobile devices, in this case looking at communicating with pregnant women and parents of young children, and with adults and teenagers about sexual health and family planning.[2] These areas of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health (RMNCAH) are where important gains have been made worldwide, but there remains room for improvement. Ames and colleagues sought to examine and understand people's perceptions and experiences of using digital targeted client communication. This might include communication in different formats and with a range of purposes related to RMNCAH – for example, receiving text message reminders to take medicines (e.g. HIV medicines) or go to appointments (such as childhood vaccination appointments), or phone calls offering information or education (such as about breastfeeding or childhood illnesses), support (e.g. providing encouragement to change behaviours) or advice (such as advising about local healthcare services). These communication strategies have the potential to improve health outcomes by communicating with people or by supporting behaviour change. However, changing people's health behaviours to a significant and meaningful degree is notoriously challenging and seldom very effective across the board. There are a multitude of systematic reviews of interventions aiming to change behaviours of both patients and providers, with the overall objective of improving health outcomes – many of which show little or no average effects across groups of people.[3] This evidence synthesis is therefore important as it may help to understand why communicating with people around their health might (or might not) change behaviours and improve consequent health outcomes. By examining the experiences and perspectives of those receiving the interventions, this qualitative evidence synthesis allows us to better understand the interventions' acceptability and usefulness, barriers to their uptake, and factors to be considered when planning implementation. The synthesis looked at 35 studies from countries around the world, focussing on communication related to RMNCAH. Of the 35 studies, 16 were from high‐income countries, mainly the United States, and 19 were from low‐ or middle‐income countries, mainly African countries. Many of the studies presented hypothetical scenarios. The findings from the synthesis are mixed and give us a more nuanced picture of the role of targeted digital communication. People receiving targeted digital communications from health services often liked and valued these contacts, feeling supported and connected by them. However, some also reported problems with the use of these technologies, which may represent barriers to their use. These included practical or technical barriers like poor network or Internet access, as well as cost, language, technical literacy, reading or issues around confidentiality, especially where personal health conditions were involved. Access to mobile phones may also be a barrier, particularly for women and adolescents who may have to share or borrow a phone or who have access controlled by others. In such situations it may be difficult to receive communications or to maintain privacy of content. The synthesis also shows that people's experiences of these interventions are influenced by factors such as the timing of messages, their frequency and content, and their trust in the sender. Identifying key features of such communications by the people who use them might therefore help to inform future choices about how and when such messaging is used. The authors used their knowledge from 25 separate findings to list ten implications for practice. This section of the review is hugely valuable, making a practical contribution to assist governments and public health agencies wishing to develop or improve their delivery of digital health. The implications serve as a list of points to consider, including issues of access (seven different aspects are considered), privacy and confidentiality, reliability, credibility and trust, and responsiveness to the needs and preferences of users. In this way, qualitative evidence is building a picture of how to better communicate with people about health. For example, an earlier 2017 Cochrane qualitative evidence synthesis by Ames, Glenton and Lewin on parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination provides ample evidence that may help program managers to deliver or plan communication interventions in ways that are responsive to and acceptable to parents.[4] The qualitative synthesis method, therefore, puts a spotlight on how people's experiences of health and health care in the context of their lives may lead to the design of better interventions, as well as to experimental studies which take more account of the diversity that exists in people's attitudes and decision‐making experiences.[5] In the case of this qualitative evidence synthesis by Ames and colleagues, the method pulled together a substantial body of research (35 data‐rich studies were sampled from 48 studies identified, with the high‐to‐moderate confidence in the evidence for 13 of the synthesized findings). The evidence from this review can inform the development of interventions, and the design of trials and their implementation. While waiting for such new trials or trial evidence on effects to emerge, decision‐makers can build their programs on the highly informative base developed by this review. This qualitative evidence synthesis, alongside other reviews, has informed development by the World Health Organization of its first guideline for using digital technologies for health systems strengthening,[1, 6] part of a comprehensive program of work to better understand and support implementation of such new technologies.
Ryan R
,Hill S
《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》
Determinants of formula feeding among mothers with infants and young children in six Sub Sahara African countries: Multilevel analysis of data from demographic and health survey.
Formula feeding is providing infants with prepared formula as an alternative to or alongside breastfeeding. While breast milk is widely regarded as the optimal source of nutrition for infants, formula feeding is a common practice. The recommended approach is exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months, followed by the introduction of complementary foods after that period, which is crucial for child growth and development. Formal feeding has a negative impact on an infant's health, causing malnutrition and other illnesses. Therefore, this study was investigated to assess formula feeding and determinant factors among mothers with infants in six sub-Saharan African countries.
A total weighted sample of 26,119 mothers with infants and young children less than two years was included in this study. The data were taken from a recent demographic and health survey in six sub-Sahara African countries. A multilevel, multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the determinant factors associated with formula feeding. In the multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds ratio with a 95% CI was used to declare a statistically significant association with formula feeding among mothers with infants.
In this study, the proportion of mothers with infants who use formula feeding was 17.1%. In multilevel logistic analysis (model III), the significant factors associated with formula feeding were the age of the mothers; 25-34 years (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI (1.2-1.41)), 35-49 years (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI (1.22-1.54)), multiple children (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI (1.23-1.77)), maternal educational status; secondary and higher (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI (2.11-2.66)), mother's employment status; (AOR = 1.24; 95% CI (1.14-1.5));, richer households (AOR = 1.2; 95% CI (1.10-1.36)), place of delivery (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI (1.83-2.44)), household media exposure (AOR = 1.5; 95% CI (1.3-1.68))place of residence (AOR = 1.97; 95% CI (1.79-2.17)), community illiteracy level (AOR = 1.17; 95% CI (1.02-1.34)), and community media exposure (AOR = 1.2; 95% CI (1.03-1.38)).
Formula feeding among mothers with infants in Sub-Saharan Africa has emerged as a public health concern. The recommended approach is to promote exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months, followed by the introduction of complementary feeding after that period. Factors associated with formula feeding include older maternal age, secondary and higher education, delivery in health institutions, employment status, higher household income, twin births, urban residence, low community illiteracy rates, and increased community media exposure. Stakeholders and health policymakers should be focused on strategies to improve breast feeding and discourage infant formula feeding.
Ali MS
,Zegeye AF
,Workneh BS
,Zeleke GA
,Mekonen EG
,Aemro A
,Tekeba B
,Tamir TT
,Wassie M
,Terefe B
... -
《PLoS One》
Non-adherence to antenatal iron supplementation and its determinants among pregnant women in 35 sub-saharan African countries: a generalized linear mixed-effects modeling with robust Poisson regression analysis.
Despite the integration of iron supplementation into routine antenatal care programs as a nutritional intervention to prevent anemia in pregnant women, the use of this supplement for the recommended duration remains low in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Evidence on maternal compliance with iron supplementation at the SSA level is lacking and most of the previous studies have been limited to specific geographic areas. Therefore, the current study used large population survey data from 35 SSA countries to estimate the pooled prevalence of non-adherence and its determinants.
A secondary analysis was conducted using data from the demographic and health surveys across 35 SSA countries. After excluding women with missing data on the outcome variable, a weighted sample of 158,941 women who received iron supplementation during their recent pregnancy was included in the analysis. Forest plot was used to present the pooled and country-level rates of non-adherence to antenatal iron supplementation. A multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression with robust variance was done to identify determinants of non-adherence.
The pooled prevalence of non-compliance to iron supplementation in SSA was 65.1% [95% CI: 64.9 - 65.3%], with the lowest level in Zambia (18%) and the highest in Burundi (97%). The analysis revealed that living in rural areas (aPR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.13-1.19), lack of access to mass media (aPR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.09-1.12), low household wealth (aPR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.09-1.14), late (aPR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.17-1.20) and frequent ANC visit (aPR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.26, 1.29), women's employment status (aPR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06), husband illiteracy (aPR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.10-1.13), and distance to a health facilities (aPR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05) were associated higher prevalence of non-adherence. Conversely, older maternal age was associated lower prevalence of non-compliance (aPR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.97).
More than six out of ten pregnant women in SSA do not take iron supplements for the recommended period, with substantial variations across the countries. The level of non-adherence was significantly varied by women's sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics. This urges the need for strengthening community health interventions and other existing programs to reach women in rural and economically disadvantaged settings. Furthermore, promoting antenatal care services through mass media and community-based health education strategies is key for scaling up the utilization of the supplement. Our results also suggest the importance of establishing the community-based distribution of iron supplements to address women with limited access to the healthcare system.
Mare KU
,Aychiluhm SB
,Mulaw GF
,Sabo KG
,Ebrahim OA
,Tebeje TM
,Seifu BL
... -
《BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth》