Multimodal monitoring in patients with acute brain injury - A survey from critical care providers.

Multimodal neuromonitoring (MMM) aims to improve outcome after acute brain injury, and thus admission in specialized Neurocritical Care Units with potential access to MMM is necessary. Various invasive and noninvasive modalities have been developed, however there is no strong evidence to support monitor combinations nor is there a known standardized approach. The goal of this study is to identify the most used invasive and non-invasive neuromonitoring modalities in daily practice as well as ubiquitousness of MMM standardization. In order to investigate current availability and protocolized implementation of MMM among neurocritical care units in US and non-US intensive care units, we designed a cross-sectional survey consisting of a self-administered online questionnaire of 20 closed-ended questions disseminated by the Neurocritical Care Society. Twenty-one critical care practitioners responded to our survey with a 76% completion rate. The most commonly utilized non-invasive neuromonitoring modalities were continuous electroencephalography followed by transcranial doppler. The most common invasive modalities were external ventricular drain followed by parenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring. MMM is most utilized in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and there were no differences regarding established institutional protocol, 24-h cEEG availability and invasive monitor placement between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. MMM is considered standard of care in 28% of responders' hospitals, whereas in 26.7% it is deemed experimental and only done as part of clinical trials. Only 26.7% hospitals use a computerized data integration system. Our survey revealed overall limited use of MMM with no established institutional protocols among institutions. Ongoing research and further standardization of MMM will clarify its benefit to patients suffering from severe brain injury.

Klavansky D ，Romero R ，Dangayach NS ，Nelson SE ，Liang J ，Reynolds A ，Tsetsou S ... -  《-》

A Survey of Neuromonitoring Practices in North American Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

Neuromonitoring is the use of continuous measures of brain physiology to detect clinically important events in real-time. Neuromonitoring devices can be invasive or non-invasive and are typically used on patients with acute brain injury or at high risk for brain injury. The goal of this study was to characterize neuromonitoring infrastructure and practices in North American pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). An electronic, web-based survey was distributed to 70 North American institutions participating in the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group. Questions related to the clinical use of neuromonitoring devices, integrative multimodality neuromonitoring capabilities, and neuromonitoring infrastructure were included. Survey results were presented using descriptive statistics. The survey was completed by faculty at 74% (52 of 70) of institutions. All 52 institutions measure intracranial pressure and have electroencephalography capability, whereas 87% (45 of 52) use near-infrared spectroscopy and 40% (21/52) use transcranial Doppler. Individual patient monitoring decisions were driven by institutional protocols and collaboration between critical care, neurology, and neurosurgery attendings. Reported device utilization varied by brain injury etiology. Only 15% (eight of 52) of institutions utilized a multimodality neuromonitoring platform to integrate and synchronize data from multiple devices. A database of neuromonitoring patients was maintained at 35% (18 of 52) of institutions. Funding for neuromonitoring programs was variable with contributions from hospitals (19%, 10 of 52), private donations (12%, six of 52), and research funds (12%, six of 52), although 73% (40 of 52) have no dedicated funds. Neuromonitoring indications, devices, and infrastructure vary by institution in North American pediatric critical care units. Noninvasive modalities were utilized more liberally, although not uniformly, than invasive monitoring. Further studies are needed to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of clinical neuromonitoring data, and to determine whether neuromonitoring systems impact neurological outcomes.

Kirschen MP ，LaRovere K ，Balakrishnan B ，Erklauer J ，Francoeur C ，Ganesan SL ，Jayakar A ，Lovett M ，Luchette M ，Press CA ，Wolf M ，Ferrazzano P ，Wainwright MS ，Appavu B ，Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group (PNCRG) ... -  《-》

Feasibility and Safety of Integrating Extended TCD Assessments in a Full Multimodal Neuromonitoring Protocol After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Targeting single monitoring modalities such as intracranial pressure (ICP) or cerebral perfusion pressure alone has shown to be insufficient in improving outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Multimodality monitoring (MMM) allows for a more complete description of brain function and for individualized management. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) represents the gold standard for continuous cerebral blood flow velocity assessment, but requires high levels skill and time. In TBI, the practical aspects of conducting extended TCD monitoring sessions have yet to be evaluated. Patients with acute moderate-to-severe TBI admitted to the neurocritical care unit between March 2022 and December 2023 receiving invasive ICP measurements were evaluated for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included trauma incompatible with TCD monitoring and if MMM was unwarranted. Daily MMM sessions (in addition to regular monitoring) were performed using TCD (Delica EMS 9D System or the DWL Doppler Box) for ≤5 d. Quantitative and qualitative feasibility, safety, and quality metrics were assessed. Of 74 patients, 36 (75% male; mean age, 44 ± 17 y) were included. Common reasons for exclusion were skull fractures (n = 12) and decompressive craniectomy (n = 9). We acquired 88 recordings (mean, 275 ± 88 min). Overall monitoring times increased, and set-up times decreased. Physiologic variables (including ICP/brain temperature) did not change with TCD application. A single adverse event (dislodging of a microdialysis catheter) occurred. Implementing extended TCD monitoring in MMM protocols is feasible and safe. Considering these results, inclusion of long-term TCD as part of the MMM is strongly encouraged to allow for in-depth description and direct evaluation of hemodynamic changes after TBI.

Bögli SY ，Cucciolini G ，Cherchi MS ，Motroni V ，Olakorede I ，O'Leary R ，Beqiri E ，Smith CA ，Smielewski P ... -  《-》

Multimodal neuromonitoring in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Neuromonitoring is used to assess the central nervous system in the intensive care unit. The purpose of neuromonitoring is to detect neurologic deterioration and intervene to prevent irreversible nervous system dysfunction. Neuromonitoring starts with the standard neurologic examination, which may lag behind the pathophysiologic changes. Additional modalities including continuous electroencephalography (CEEG), multiple physiologic parameters, and structural neuroimaging may detect changes earlier. Multimodal neuromonitoring now refers to an integrated combination and display of non-invasive and invasive modalities, permitting tailored treatment for the individual patient. This chapter reviews the non-invasive and invasive modalities used in pediatric neurocritical care.

Appavu B ，Riviello JJ Jr 《-》

Recommendations for the use of multimodal monitoring in the neurointensive care unit.

Citerio G ，Oddo M ，Taccone FS 《-》