Navigating Cardiovascular Risk and Lipid Management in Indian Patients: Key Messages from the Lipid Association of India 2024 Consensus Statement IV.
Effective lipid management is crucial for preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The Western lipid guidelines may not apply to Indian subjects because of the vast differences in cardiovascular (CV) disease epidemiology. To overcome this challenge, the Lipid Association of India (LAI) in 2016 proposed an ASCVD risk stratification algorithm. The appropriate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for various risk groups were proposed, with an LDL-C target of <50 mg/dL recommended for the first time globally for patients in the very high-risk group. Subsequently, in 2020, an extreme risk group was added because of observations that patients with more severe or extensive ASCVD, along with multiple risk factors and comorbidities, had increased rates of adverse CV events and could benefit from more intensive LDL-C lowering. The extreme risk group was subdivided into categories A and B, with LDL-C targets as low as 30 mg/dL or lower. The availability of further evidence regarding the significance of novel risk factors and the availability of new LDL-C lowering therapies necessitated refining the ASCVD risk assessment algorithm, defining LDL-C targets for subjects with these risk factors, and incorporating recommendations for attaining very low LDL-C levels in a defined, select group of patients. Accordingly, the LAI expert group recently published the Consensus Statement IV, which is a comprehensive document addressing several key issues about risk stratification and dyslipidemia management in Indian subjects. LDL-C and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) are not only primary and co-primary targets for lipid-lowering therapy but also risk factors for ASCVD risk stratification. Apolipoprotein B is a secondary target. The risk assessment algorithm has been updated to incorporate several nonconventional yet relevant CV risk factors. Additionally, the role of subclinical atherosclerosis has been highlighted. The CV risk due to subclinical atherosclerosis has been considered equivalent to that of established ASCVD, and hence, similar LDL-C targets have been recommended. Furthermore, a new risk category-extreme risk group category C has been added for the small subgroup of patients who continue to experience ASCVD sequelae despite achieving LDL-C levels of 30 mg/dL or lower. An ultralow LDL-C target (10-15 mg/dL) has been recommended along with optimal control of risk factors and guideline-directed management of comorbidities. Dyslipidemia management should be effective with sustained LDL-C lowering. In high-risk situations (e.g., acute coronary syndrome), the LDL-C target should be achieved as early as possible, preferably within the first 2 weeks. The present document summarizes the key messages from the LAI Consensus Statement IV.
Puri R
，Mehta V
，Bansal M
，Shetty S
，Yusuf J
，Agarwala R
，Vijan VM
，Muruganathan A
，Tiwaskar M
，Narasingan SN
，Iyengar SS
... -
《-》
Does Adopting Western Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets Expose Indians to a Higher Risk of Cardiovascular Events? Expert Opinion From the Lipid Association of India.
Adverse cardiovascular (CV) events have declined in Western countries due at least in part to aggressive risk factor control, including dyslipidemia management. The American and European (Western) dyslipidemia treatment guidelines have contributed significantly to the reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) incidence in the respective populations. However, their direct extrapolation to Indian patients does not seem appropriate for the reasons described below. In the US, mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have markedly declined over the last 2 decades, correlating with a proportional reduction in CV events. Conversely, poor risk factor control and dyslipidemia management have led to increased CV and coronary artery disease (CAD) mortality rates in India. The population-attributable risk of dyslipidemia is about 50% for myocardial infarction, signifying its major role in CV events. In addition, the pattern of dyslipidemia in Indians differs considerably from that in Western populations, requiring unique strategies for lipid management in Indians and modified treatment targets. The Lipid Association of India (LAI) recognized the need for tailored LDL-C targets for Indians and recommended lower targets compared to Western guidelines. For individuals with established ASCVD or diabetes with additional risk factors, an LDL-C target of <50 mg/dL was recommended, with an optional target of ≤30 mg/dL for individuals at extremely high risk. There are several reasons that necessitate these lower targets. In Indian subjects, CAD develops 10 years earlier than in Western populations and is more malignant. Additionally, Indians experience higher CAD mortality despite having lower basal LDL-C levels, requiring greater LDL-C reduction to achieve a comparable CV event reduction. The Indian Council for Medical Research-India Diabetes study described a high prevalence of dyslipidemia among Indians, characterized by relatively lower LDL-C levels, higher triglyceride levels, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels compared to Western populations. About 30% of Indians have hypertriglyceridemia, aggravating ASCVD risk and complicating dyslipidemia management. The levels of atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including remnant lipoproteins, are increased in hypertriglyceridemia and are predictive of CV events. Hypertriglyceridemia is also associated with higher levels of small, dense LDL particles, which are more atherogenic, and higher levels of apolipoprotein B (Apo B), reflecting a higher burden of circulating atherogenic lipoprotein particles. A high prevalence of low HDL-C, which is often dysfunctional, and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels further contribute to the heightened atherogenicity and premature CAD in Indians. Considering the unique characteristics of atherogenic dyslipidemia in Indians, lower LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and Apo B goals compared to Western guidelines are required for effective control of ASCVD risk in Indians. South Asian ancestry is identified as a risk enhancer in the American lipid management guidelines, highlighting the elevated ASCVD risk of Indian and other South Asian individuals, suggesting a need for more aggressive LDL-C lowering in such individuals. Hence, the LDL-C goals recommended by the Western guidelines may be excessively high for Indians and could result in significant residual ASCVD risk attributable to inadequate LDL-C lowering. Further, the results of Mendelian randomization studies have shown that lowering LDL-C by 5-10 mg/dL reduces CV risk by 8-18%. The lower LDL-C targets proposed by LAI can yield these incremental benefits. In conclusion, Western LDL-C targets may not be suitable for Indian subjects, given the earlier presentation of ASCVD at lower LDL-C levels. They may result in greater CV events that could otherwise be prevented with lower LDL-C targets. The atherogenic dyslipidemia in Indian individuals necessitates more aggressive LDL-C and non-HDL-C lowering, as recommended by the LAI, in order to stem the epidemic of ASCVD in India.
Puri R
，Mehta V
，Bansal M
，Duell PB
，Iyengar SS
，Shetty S
，Graham I
，Mohan JC
，Kaul U
，Rao D
，Agarwala R
，Wander GS
，Hazra P
，Kumar S
，Wangnoo SK
，Zargar AH
，Saboo B
，Yusuf J
，Vijan VM
，Aggarwal P
，Chandra S
，Kasliwal RR
，Manoria PC
，Rabbani MU
，Chag MC
，Prabhakar D
，Khan A
，Bordoloi N
，Palanippan S
，Mahajan K
，Pradhan A
，Jain D
，Murugnathan A
，Dabla PK
，Desai N
，Tiwaskar MH
，Nair DR
，Singh C
，Panda J
，Gupta V
，Sahoo P
，Wong ND
... -
《-》
Proposed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals for secondary prevention and familial hypercholesterolemia in India with focus on PCSK9 inhibitor monoclonal antibodies: Expert consensus statement from Lipid Association of India.
Rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are strikingly high in India compared to Western countries and are increasing. Moreover, ASCVD events occur at a younger age with only modest hypercholesterolemia, most commonly with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The course of ASCVD also appears to be more fulminant with higher mortality.
In light of these issues, the Lipid Association of India (LAI) endeavored to develop revised guidelines with more aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in secondary prevention and for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia compared to guidelines in the United States and other countries.
Owing to the paucity of clinical outcomes data in India, it was necessary to place major emphasis on expert opinion as a complement to randomized placebo-controlled data generated mostly in non-Indian cohorts. To facilitate this process, the LAI conducted a series of 19 meetings among 162 lipid specialists in 13 cities throughout India over a period of 11 months before formulating this expert consensus statement.
The LAI recommends an LDL-C goal <50 mg/dL in all patients in secondary prevention or very high-risk primary prevention but proposes an optional goal ≤30 mg/dL in category A extreme-risk patients (eg, coronary artery disease + familial hypercholesterolemia) and a recommended goal ≤30 mg/dL in category B extreme-risk patients [coronary artery disease + (1) diabetes and polyvascular disease/≥3 major ASCVD risk factors/end organ damage, or (2) recurrent acute coronary syndrome within 12 months despite LDL-C <50 mg/dL, or (3) homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia].
More aggressive LDL-C goals are needed for prevention of ASCVD in India, as described in this expert consensus statement. Use of statins and ezetimibe needs to increase in India in combination with improved control of other ASCVD risk factors. Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitors can improve LDL-C goal achievement in patients with refractory hypercholesterolemia.
Puri R
，Mehta V
，Duell PB
，Nair D
，Mohan JC
，Yusuf J
，Dalal JJ
，Mishra S
，Kasliwal RR
，Agarwal R
，Mukhopadhyay S
，Wardhan H
，Khanna NN
，Pradhan A
，Mehrotra R
，Kumar A
，Puri S
，Muruganathan A
，Sattur GB
，Yadav M
，Singh HP
，Agarwal RK
，Nanda R
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
