Low energy contact X-ray brachytherapy for treatment of rectal cancer: a health technology appraisal by Health Technology Wales.

Health Technology Wales sought to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) for early-stage rectal cancer. Relevant studies were identified through systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus. A cost-utility model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CXB in National Health Service Wales, using results of the Organ Preservation in Early Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPERA) trial. Patient perspectives were obtained through the Papillon Patient Support group and All-Wales Cancer Network. The OPERA randomized controlled trial showed that CXB improved complete response and organ preservation rates compared with external-beam boost for people with T2-3b, N0-1, M0 rectal cancer who are fit for surgery. Managing more of this population non-operatively after CXB was estimated to provide 0.2 quality-adjusted life years at an additional cost of £887 per person. CXB was cost effective compared with external-beam boost at a cost of £4463 per quality-adjusted life year gained. This conclusion did not change in scenario analysis and CXB was cost effective in 91% of probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Patients valued receiving clear information on all available options to support their individual treatment choices. The detrimental impact of a stoma on quality of life led some patients to reject the idea that surgery was their only option. This evidence review and cost-utility analysis indicates that CXB is likely to be clinically and cost effective, as part of a watch and wait strategy for adults fit for surgery. Wider access to CXB is supported by patient testimonies.

Bennett H ，Rao C ，Batten L ，Hasler E ，Jarrom D ，Prettyjohns M ，Barrington C ，Sun Myint A ... -  《-》

Contact X-ray Brachytherapy as an Adjunct to a Watch and Wait Approach is an Affordable Alternative to Standard Surgical Management of Rectal Cancer for Patients with a Partial Clinical Response to Chemoradiotherapy.

Emerging evidence suggests that contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) may increase the clinical complete response rate and durability when administered after standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. The addition of CXB in partial responders is therefore probably cost-effective. The affordability of widening access to CXB in the UK, however, has not been evaluated. Decision analytical modelling with Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate long-term costs for the management of patients with rectal cancers who were given a CXB boost when a clinical complete response was not initially achieved following chemoradiotherapy in order to facilitate a watch and wait approach. A third-party payer (National Health Service) perspective was adopted, probabilistic sensitivity analysis was carried out and a scenario analysis was performed to investigate the effect of the number of referral centres and number of patients treated with CXB. We estimate that 818 (95% confidence interval 628-1021) patients per year are eligible for CXB as an adjunct to a watch and wait approach in England and Wales. As this management is less costly than surgical management for each individual patient, the more patients treated, the more affordable the technology. Even if as few as 125 patients are treated nationally in 15 centres, the cost of implementing this technology would be less than £4 million. If the average number of patients treated in each centre is 30, this technology would be cost saving within 5 years. The cost of CXB is not prohibitive according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold for implementation of new technology and may even be cost saving within 5 years compared with standard surgical management, depending on the uptake of the technology and the number of referral centres.

Rao C ，Stewart A ，Martin AP ，Collins B ，Pritchard DM ，Athanasiou T ，Sun Myint A ... -  《-》

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Contact X-ray Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Patients with Rectal Cancer Following a Partial Response to Chemoradiotherapy.

Following chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer, the addition of contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) in partial responders might increase the proportion of patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) and who are thus suitable for watch and wait management. However, the long-term cost-effectiveness of this approach has not been evaluated. Decision analytical modelling and a Markov simulation were used to compare long-term costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and cost-effectiveness from a third-party payer (National Health Service) perspective for treatment strategies after chemoradiotherapy; watch and wait with CXB when a cCR was not initially achieved after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (WWCXB), watch and wait with EBRT alone (WWEBRT) and radical surgery for all patients. The effect of uncertainty in model parameters and patient demographics was investigated. WWCXB had a higher QALY payoff than both radical surgery and WWEBRT and was less costly in most scenarios and demographic cohorts. In all plausible scenarios, WWCXB was the most cost-effective, at a threshold of £20 000/QALY. This finding was insensitive to uncertainty associated with model parameters. WWCXB is likely to be cost-effective compared with both WWEBRT alone and radical surgery. These findings support the use of CXB boost as an adjunct to a watch and wait strategy.

Rao C ，Smith FM ，Martin AP ，Dhadda AS ，Stewart A ，Gollins S ，Collins B ，Athanasiou T ，Sun Myint A ... -  《-》

Organ or sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. The role of contact X-ray brachytherapy in a monocentric series of 112 patients.

Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) has been used at Centre Antoine Lacassagne since 2002 to increase the chance of conservative treatment (organ or sphincter preservation) in rectal cancer. A consecutive series of 112 patients (pts) is reported. Three protocols were used in selected rectal adenocarcinomas. Group 1: T1 N0 treated with local excision (LE) followed by adjuvant CXB. Group 2: T2 or 'early' T3 N0 treated with CXB combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surveillance or LE. Group 3: distal 'locally advanced' T3 N0-2 treated with CXB and CRT before total proctectomy. Group 1: 27 pt (pTis: 3; pT1: 21; pT2: 3). After LE with CXB alone (20 pt) or CXB + CRT (7 pt) one local recurrence occurred. Organ preservation was achieved in 26 pt (96%). Group 2: 45 pt (T1: 2; T2: 23; T3: 20) treated with CXB alone (4 pt) or CXB + CRT or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (41 pt). A clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in 43/45 (96%) and 3 pt developed a local recurrence (11% at 5 years). The specific survival was 76% at 5 years and the rate of organ preservation was 89% (40/45 pt) with good bowel function in 36 pt. Group 3: 40 pt, anterior resection (with sphincter preservation) was possible in 35 pt (86%) with a 3-year local recurrence of 6%. CXB usually combined as a boost with CRT or EBRT may safely increase the chance of a conservative treatment (organ or sphincter preservation) for selected rectal cancers.

Frin AC ，Evesque L ，Gal J ，Benezery K ，François E ，Gugenheim J ，Benizri E ，Château Y ，Marcié S ，Doyen J ，Gérard JP ... -  《-》

Sequence of Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) and External Beam Radiation (EBRT) in organ-preserving treatment for small rectal cancer.

External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) and vice versa are viable alternatives to surgery for selected rectal cancer patients who have small tumours (≤3 cm). However, the optimal sequence of treatment needs to be established. We compared two approaches using Propensity Score (PS) matching and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses to investigate whether the sequence of treatment affected patient outcomes. This retrospective analysis (2008-2019) included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (cT1-3,N0-1,M0, grade 1-2, size ≤ 3 cm) who received both EBRT and CXB, irrespective of treatment sequence. PS matching and IPTW were conducted to balance covariate standardised mean differences between groups. Oncological outcomes and rate of post-treatment rectal bleeding were assessed. Following PS matching and IPTW analyses from 251 eligible patients; 103 starting with EBRT (median follow-up: 37 [IQR:18-56] months) and 148 with CXB (median follow-up: 32 [IQR:16-54] months, a significant improvement in 3-year overall survival (77% vs 85%, p = 0.02, [HR:0.58 (95% CI:0.37-0.91)]) and a higher risk of post-treatment rectal bleeding (grade 1 (26%) and grade 2 (6%)) were found in patients who started with CXB (p = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in local regrowth (18% vs 12%, p = 0.47), distant relapse (10% vs 6%, p = 0.53), 3-year organ preservation rates (70% vs 75%, p = 0.20, [HR:0.66 (95% CI: 0.35-1.26)]), or disease-free survival (78% vs 82%, p = 0.17, [HR: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.16-1.38)]) CONCLUSION: In patients with rectal cancer (≤3 cm), commencing with CXB rather than EBRT, was associated with improved overall survival, but had a higher risk of G1/2 rectal bleeding. No statistically significant differences were observed in other oncological outcomes.

Than NW ，Pritchard DM ，Hughes DM ，Duckworth CA ，Wong H ，Haq MU ，Sripadam R ，Myint AS ... -  《-》