Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens.

Whole-genome sequencing has become the method of choice for bacterial outbreak investigation, with most clinical and public health laboratories currently routinely using short-read Illumina sequencing. Recently, long-read Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing has gained prominence and may offer advantages over short-read sequencing, particularly with the recent introduction of the R10 chemistry, which promises much lower error rates than the R9 chemistry. However, limited information is available on its performance for bacterial single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based outbreak investigation. We present an open-source workflow, Prokaryotic Awesome variant Calling Utility (PACU) (https://github.com/BioinformaticsPlatformWIV-ISP/PACU), for constructing SNP phylogenies using Illumina and/or ONT R9/R10 sequencing data. The workflow was evaluated using outbreak data sets of Shiga toxin-producing and by comparing ONT R9 and R10 with Illumina data. The performance of each sequencing technology was evaluated not only separately but also by integrating samples sequenced by different technologies/chemistries into the same phylogenomic analysis. Additionally, the minimum sequencing time required to obtain accurate phylogenetic results using nanopore sequencing was evaluated. PACU allowed accurate identification of outbreak clusters for both species using all technologies/chemistries, but ONT R9 results deviated slightly more from the Illumina results. ONT R10 results showed trends very similar to Illumina, and we found that integrating data sets sequenced by either Illumina or ONT R10 for different isolates into the same analysis produced stable and highly accurate phylogenomic results. The resulting phylogenies for these two outbreaks stabilized after ~20 hours of sequencing for ONT R9 and ~8 hours for ONT R10. This study provides a proof of concept for using ONT R10, either in isolation or in combination with Illumina, for rapid and accurate bacterial SNP-based outbreak investigation.

Bogaerts B ，Van den Bossche A ，Verhaegen B ，Delbrassinne L ，Mattheus W ，Nouws S ，Godfroid M ，Hoffman S ，Roosens NHC ，De Keersmaecker SCJ ，Vanneste K ... -  《-》

Evaluation of the accuracy of bacterial genome reconstruction with Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 long-read-only sequencing.

Sanderson ND ，Hopkins KMV ，Colpus M ，Parker M ，Lipworth S ，Crook D ，Stoesser N ... -  《Microbial Genomics》

Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction.

Complete, accurate, cost-effective, and high-throughput reconstruction of bacterial genomes for large-scale genomic epidemiological studies is currently only possible with hybrid assembly, combining long- (typically using nanopore sequencing) and short-read (Illumina) datasets. Being able to use nanopore-only data would be a significant advance. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) have recently released a new flowcell (R10.4) and chemistry (Kit12), which reportedly generate per-read accuracies rivalling those of Illumina data. To evaluate this, we sequenced DNA extracts from four commonly studied bacterial pathogens, namely , , and , using Illumina and ONT's R9.4.1/Kit10, R10.3/Kit12, R10.4/Kit12 flowcells/chemistries. We compared raw read accuracy and assembly accuracy for each modality, considering the impact of different nanopore basecalling models, commonly used assemblers, sequencing depth, and the use of duplex versus simplex reads. 'Super accuracy' (sup) basecalled R10.4 reads - in particular duplex reads - have high per-read accuracies and could be used to robustly reconstruct bacterial genomes without the use of Illumina data. However, the per-run yield of duplex reads generated in our hands with standard sequencing protocols was low (typically <10 %), with substantial implications for cost and throughput if relying on nanopore data only to enable bacterial genome reconstruction. In addition, recovery of small plasmids with the best-performing long-read assembler (Flye) was inconsistent. R10.4/Kit12 combined with sup basecalling holds promise as a singular sequencing technology in the reconstruction of commonly studied bacterial genomes, but hybrid assembly (Illumina+R9.4.1 hac) currently remains the highest throughput, most robust, and cost-effective approach to fully reconstruct these bacterial genomes.

Sanderson ND ，Kapel N ，Rodger G ，Webster H ，Lipworth S ，Street TL ，Peto T ，Crook D ，Stoesser N ... -  《Microbial Genomics》

The usefulness of nanopore sequencing in whole-genome sequencing-based genotyping of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis.

Bacterial genotyping through whole-genome sequencing plays a crucial role in disease surveillance and outbreak investigations in public health laboratories. This study assessed the effectiveness of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing in the genotyping of and serovar Enteritidis. Our results indicated that ONT sequences, generated with the R10.4.1 flow cell and basecalled using the Dorado 0.5.0 Super Accurate 4.3 model, exhibited comparable accuracy to Illumina sequences, effectively discriminating among bacterial strains from outbreaks. These findings suggest that ONT sequencing has the potential to be a promising tool for rapid whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens in public health laboratories for epidemiological investigations. This study unveils that Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing, by itself, holds the potential to serve as a whole-genome sequencing-based genotyping tool in public health laboratories, enabling routine subtyping of bacterial isolates for disease surveillance and outbreak investigations.

Hong Y-P ，Chen B-H ，Wang Y-W ，Teng R-H ，Wei H-L ，Chiou C-S ... -  《Microbiology Spectrum》

An evolution of Nanopore next-generation sequencing technology: implications for medical microbiology and public health.

Next-generation sequencing has evolved as a powerful tool, with applications that extend from diagnosis to public health surveillance and outbreak investigations. Short-read sequencing, using primarily Illumina chemistry, has been the prevailing approach. Single-molecule sensing and long-read sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) has witnessed a breakthrough in the evolution of the technology, performance, and applications in the past few years. In this issue of the , Bogaerts et al. (https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01576-23) describe the utility of the latest ONT sequencing technology, the R10.4.1, in bacterial outbreak investigations. The authors demonstrate that ONT R10.4.1 technology can be comparable to Illumina sequencing for single-nucleotide polymorphism-based phylogeny. The authors emphasize that the reproducibility between ONT and Illumina technologies could facilitate collaborations among laboratories utilizing different sequencing platforms for outbreak investigations.

Mostafa HH 《-》