Listening-Related Fatigue in New and Experienced Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Active listening in everyday settings is challenging and requires substantial mental effort, particularly in noisy settings. In some cases, effortful listening can lead to significant listening-related fatigue and negatively affect quality of life. However, our understanding of factors that affect the severity of fatigue is limited. Hearing aids and cochlear implants (CIs) can improve speech understanding and thus, potentially, reduce listening effort and fatigue. Some research supports this idea for adult hearing aid users with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, but similar work in CI users is very limited. This study examined (1) longitudinal changes in listening-related fatigue in new and established CI users, and (2) relationships between demographic and audiologic factors and preimplantation and postimplantation listening-related fatigue. Participants included an experimental group of 48 adult CI candidates receiving either a unilateral implant (n = 46) or simultaneous, bilateral implants (n = 2) and a control group of 96 experienced (>12 months experience) adult CI users (50 unilateral, 46 bilateral). Listening-related fatigue was evaluated using the 40-item version of the Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale for Adults. Experimental group ratings were obtained before implantation and again at 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month(s) postactivation. Control group participants completed the scale twice-upon study entry and approximately 3 months later. Additional measures, including a social isolation and disconnectedness questionnaire, hearing handicap inventory, and the Effort Assessment Scale, were also administered at multiple time points. The role of these measures and select demographic and audiologic factors on preimplant and postimplant fatigue ratings were examined. Adult CI candidates reported significantly more fatigue, greater self-perceived hearing handicap, greater listening effort, and more social isolation than experienced adult CI users. However, significant reductions in fatigue and effort were observed within 2 weeks postimplantation. By 3 months, there were no significant differences in fatigue, effort, hearing handicap, or social isolation between new CI recipients and experienced CI users. Secondary analyses revealed that age at onset of hearing loss (before or after 2 years of age) and subjective hearing handicap contributed significantly to the variance of preimplantation fatigue ratings (those with higher handicap reported higher fatigue). In contrast, variance in postimplantation fatigue ratings was not affected by age of hearing loss onset but was affected by gender (females reported more fatigue than males) and subjective ratings of effort, handicap, and isolation (those reporting more effort, handicap, and isolation reported more fatigue). Listening-related fatigue is a significant problem for many CI candidates, as well as for many experienced unilateral and bilateral CI users. Receipt of a CI significantly reduced listening-related fatigue (as well as listening effort, hearing handicap, and social isolation) as soon as 2 weeks post-CI activation. However, the magnitude of fatigue-related issues for both CI candidates and experienced CI users varies widely. Audiologic factors, such as hearing loss severity and aided speech recognition, were not predictive of individual differences in listening-related fatigue. In contrast, strong associations were observed between perceived hearing handicap and listening-related fatigue in all groups suggesting fatigue-related issues may be a component of perceived hearing handicap.

Hornsby BWY ，Picou EM ，Ricketts TA ，Gifford R ... -  《-》

Listening Effort Measured With Pupillometry in Cochlear Implant Users Depends on Sound Level, But Not on the Signal to Noise Ratio When Using the Matrix Test.

We investigated whether listening effort is dependent on task difficulty for cochlear implant (CI) users when using the Matrix speech-in-noise test. To this end, we measured peak pupil dilation (PPD) at a wide range of signal to noise ratios (SNR) by systematically changing the noise level at a constant speech level, and vice versa. A group of mostly elderly CI users performed the Dutch/Flemish Matrix test in quiet and in multitalker babble at different SNRs. SNRs were set relative to the speech-recognition threshold (SRT), namely at SRT, and 5 and 10 dB above SRT (0 dB, +5 dB, and +10 dB re SRT). The latter 2 conditions were obtained by either varying speech level (at a fixed noise level of 60 dBA) or by varying noise level (with a fixed speech level). We compared these PPDs with those of a group of typical hearing (TH) listeners. In addition, listening effort was assessed with subjective ratings on a Likert scale. PPD for the CI group did not significantly depend on SNR, whereas SNR significantly affected PPDs for TH listeners. Subjective effort ratings depended significantly on SNR for both groups. For CI users, PPDs were significantly larger, and effort was rated higher when speech was varied, and noise was fixed for CI users. By contrast, for TH listeners effort ratings were significantly higher and performance scores lower when noise was varied, and speech was fixed. The lack of a significant effect of varying SNR on PPD suggests that the Matrix test may not be a feasible speech test for measuring listening effort with pupillometric measures for CI users. A rating test appeared more promising in this population, corroborating earlier reports that subjective measures may reflect different dimensions of listening effort than pupil dilation. Establishing the SNR by varying speech or noise level can have subtle, but significant effects on measures of listening effort, and these effects can differ between TH listeners and CI users.

Stronks HC ，Tops AL ，Quach KW ，Briaire JJ ，Frijns JHM ... -  《-》

A Scoping Review of Studies Comparing Outcomes for Children With Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids to Children With Cochlear Implants.

Clinical practice regarding children's candidature for cochlear implantation varies internationally, albeit with a recent global trend toward implanting children with more residual hearing than in the past. The provision of either hearing aids or cochlear implants can influence a wide range of children's outcomes. However, guidance on eligibility and suitability for implantation is often based on a small number of studies and a limited range of speech perception measures. No recent reviews have catalogued what is known about comparative outcomes for children with severe hearing-loss using hearing aids to children using cochlear implants. This article describes the findings of a scoping review that addressed the question "What research has been conducted comparing cochlear implant outcomes to outcomes in children using hearing aids with severe hearing-loss in the better-hearing ear?" The first objective was to catalogue the characteristics of studies pertinent to these children's candidature for cochlear implantation, to inform families, clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers. The second objective was to identify gaps in the evidence base, to inform future research projects and identify opportunities for evidence synthesis. We included studies comparing separate groups of children using hearing aids to those using cochlear implants and also repeated measures studies comparing outcomes of children with severe hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation. We included any outcomes that might feasibly be influenced by the provision of hearing aids or cochlear implants. We searched the electronic databases Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL, for peer-reviewed journal articles with full-texts written in English, published from July 2007 to October 2019. The scoping methodology followed the approach recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute regarding study selection, data extraction, and data presentation. Twenty-one eligible studies were identified, conducted across 11 countries. The majority of children studied had either congenital or prelingual hearing loss, with typical cognitive function, experience of spoken language, and most implanted children used one implant. Speech and language development and speech perception were the most frequently assessed outcomes. However, some aspects of these outcomes were sparsely represented including voice, communication and pragmatic skills, and speech perception in complex background noise. Two studies compared literacy, two sound localization, one quality of life, and one psychosocial outcomes. None compared educational attainment, listening fatigue, balance, tinnitus, or music perception. This scoping review provides a summary of the literature regarding comparative outcomes of children with severe hearing-loss using acoustic hearing aids and children using cochlear implants. Notable gaps in knowledge that could be addressed in future research includes children's quality of life, educational attainment, and complex listening and language outcomes, such as word and sentence understanding in background noise, spatial listening, communication and pragmatic skills. Clinician awareness of this sparse evidence base is important when making management decisions for children with more residual hearing than traditional implant candidates. This review also provides direction for researchers wishing to strengthen the evidence base upon which clinical decisions can be made.

Killan CF ，Hoare DJ ，Katiri R ，Pierzycki RH ，Adams B ，Hartley DEH ，Ropar D ，Kitterick PT ... -  《-》

Predictors of Emotional Prosody Identification by School-Age Children With Cochlear Implants and Their Peers With Normal Hearing.

Children with cochlear implants (CIs) vary widely in their ability to identify emotions in speech. The causes of this variability are unknown, but this knowledge will be crucial if we are to design improvements in technological or rehabilitative interventions that are effective for individual patients. The objective of this study was to investigate how well factors such as age at implantation, duration of device experience (hearing age), nonverbal cognition, vocabulary, and socioeconomic status predict prosody-based emotion identification in children with CIs, and how the key predictors in this population compare to children with normal hearing who are listening to either normal emotional speech or to degraded speech. We measured vocal emotion identification in 47 school-age CI recipients aged 7 to 19 years in a single-interval, 5-alternative forced-choice task. None of the participants had usable residual hearing based on parent/caregiver report. Stimuli consisted of a set of semantically emotion-neutral sentences that were recorded by 4 talkers in child-directed and adult-directed prosody corresponding to five emotions: neutral, angry, happy, sad, and scared. Twenty-one children with normal hearing were also tested in the same tasks; they listened to both original speech and to versions that had been noise-vocoded to simulate CI information processing. Group comparison confirmed the expected deficit in CI participants' emotion identification relative to participants with normal hearing. Within the CI group, increasing hearing age (correlated with developmental age) and nonverbal cognition outcomes predicted emotion recognition scores. Stimulus-related factors such as talker and emotional category also influenced performance and were involved in interactions with hearing age and cognition. Age at implantation was not predictive of emotion identification. Unlike the CI participants, neither cognitive status nor vocabulary predicted outcomes in participants with normal hearing, whether listening to original speech or CI-simulated speech. Age-related improvements in outcomes were similar in the two groups. Participants with normal hearing listening to original speech showed the greatest differences in their scores for different talkers and emotions. Participants with normal hearing listening to CI-simulated speech showed significant deficits compared with their performance with original speech materials, and their scores also showed the least effect of talker- and emotion-based variability. CI participants showed more variation in their scores with different talkers and emotions than participants with normal hearing listening to CI-simulated speech, but less so than participants with normal hearing listening to original speech. Taken together, these results confirm previous findings that pediatric CI recipients have deficits in emotion identification based on prosodic cues, but they improve with age and experience at a rate that is similar to peers with normal hearing. Unlike participants with normal hearing, nonverbal cognition played a significant role in CI listeners' emotion identification. Specifically, nonverbal cognition predicted the extent to which individual CI users could benefit from some talkers being more expressive of emotions than others, and this effect was greater in CI users who had less experience with their device (or were younger) than CI users who had more experience with their device (or were older). Thus, in young prelingually deaf children with CIs performing an emotional prosody identification task, cognitive resources may be harnessed to a greater degree than in older prelingually deaf children with CIs or than children with normal hearing.

Chatterjee M ，Gajre S ，Kulkarni AM ，Barrett KC ，Limb CJ ... -  《-》

Topical and oral steroids for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children.

Mulvaney CA ，Galbraith K ，Webster KE ，Rana M ，Connolly R ，Tudor-Green B ，Marom T ，Daniel M ，Venekamp RP ，Schilder AG ，MacKeith S ... -  《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》