Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus.

Radical chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus and for patients with operable disease, but who are medically unfit or unwilling for surgery. As the esophagus is a central organ, the planning target volume (PTV) is central, lies close to the spinal cord and heart, and is surrounded by the lung, which is a radiosensitive organ. Irradiation of these critical structures is reduced by the use of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has the potential to improve the uniformity of dose distribution to the tumor and reduce the dose received by surrounding normal tissues. 1. To compare the dose distribution, conformity, and homogeneity indices in radical radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus using 3DCRT and IMRT techniques 2. To compare the doses received by critical structures such as heart, lung, spinal cord, and liver. All cases of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus treated with radical chemoradiation to a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions using 3DCRT technique from January 2018 to July 2019 were included. IMRT plans were generated for these cases.The parameters that represent dose distribution to the target volume and the dose received by the organs at risk were obtained from the dose-volume histogram. The difference in the mean values of the parameters between the two techniques was calculated. The statistical significance of the difference was determined using Student's t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The volume of PTV receiving 105% and 107% of prescribed dose was significantly lower with IMRT (3.540% and 0.008%, respectively) compared to 3DCRT (7.654% and 0.623%). The homogeneity index was better with IMRT (0.088 vs. 0.107) than 3DCRT. Conformity index was found to be better with IMRT (1.149 vs. 1.573). Mean heart dose (18.216 vs. 24.591 Gy) and the volume of heart receiving 30 Gy were reduced with IMRT. The volume of lung receiving 20 Gy and the volume receiving 5 Gy were not significantly different between 3DCRT and IMRT. Maximum dose to spinal cord was similar with 3DCRT and IMRT. IMRT avoids areas of excessive irradiation within the PTV. IMRT improves dose conformity to the target volume and homogeneity of dose distribution within the PTV. The cardiac dose is significantly reduced with IMRT. The mean lung dose remains similar to 3DCRT. There is no significant increase in the volume of lung receiving low-dose radiation with IMRT.

Krishnapriya P ，Sivanandan CD ，Roshni S ，Sarin B ，Geethi MH ，Jagathnath Krishna KM ... -  《-》

Simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: a feasibility study.

Zhang WZ ，Chen JZ ，Li DR ，Chen ZJ ，Guo H ，Zhuang TT ，Li DS ，Zhou MZ ，Chen CZ ... -  《-》

Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, VMAT, and ff-IMRT for upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

The new TomoDirect (TD) modality offers a nonrotational option with discrete beam angles. We aim to compare dosimetric parameters of TD, helical tomotherapy (HT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (ff-IMRT) for upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). Twenty patients with cT2-4N0-1M0 upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were enrolled. Four plans were generated using the same dose objectives for each patient: TD, HT, VMAT with a single arc, and ff-IMRT with 5 fields (5F). The prescribed doses were used to deliver 50.4 Gy/28F to the planning target volume (PTV50.4) and then provided a 9 Gy/5F boost to PTV59.4. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) statistics, dose uniformity, and dose homogeneity were analyzed to compare treatment plans. For PTV59.4, the D2, D98, Dmean, and V100% values in HT were significantly lower than other plans (all p < 0.05), and those in TD were significantly lower than VMAT and ff-IMRT (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the D2 and Dmean values between VMAT and ff-IMRT techniques (p > 0.05). The homogeneity index (HI) differed significantly for the 4 techniques of TD, HT, VMAT, and ff-IMRT (0.03 ± 0.01, 0.02 ± 0.01, 0.06 ± 0.02, and 0.05 ± 0.01, respectively; p  < 0.001). The HI for TD was similar to HT (p = 0.166), and had statistically significant improvement compared to VMAT (p < 0.001) and ff-IMRT (p = 0.003). In comparison with the 4 conformity indices (CIs), there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). For PTV50.4, the D2 and Dmean values in HT were significantly lower than other plans (all p < 0.05), and those in TD were significantly lower than VMAT and ff-IMRT (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the D2 and Dmean values between VMAT and ff-IMRT techniques (p > 0.05). No D98 and V100% parameters differed significantly among the 4 treatment types (p > 0.05). HT plans were provided for statistically significant improvement in HI (0.03 ± 0.01) compared to TD plans (0.05 ± 0.01, p = 0.003), VMAT (0.08 ± 0.03, p < 0.001), ff-IMRT (0.08 ± 0.01, p < 0.001). The HI revealed that TD was superior to VMAT and ff-IMRT (p < 0.05). The CI differed significantly for the 4 techniques of TD, HT, VMAT, and ff-IMRT (0.59 ± 0.10, 0.69 ± 0.11, 0.64 ± 0.09, and 0.64 ± 0.11, respectively; p = 0.035). The best CI was yielded by HT. We found no significant difference for the V5, V10, V15, V30, and the mean lung dose (MLD) among the 4 techniques (all p > 0.05). However, the V20 differed significantly among TD, HT, VMAT, and ff-IMRT (21.50 ± 7.20%, 19.50 ± 5.55%, 17.65 ± 5.45%, and 16.35 ± 5.70%, respectively; p = 0.047). Average V20 for the lungs was significantly improved by the TD plans compared to VMAT (p = 0.047), and ff-IMRT (p = 0.008). The V5 value of the lung in TD was 49.30 ± 13.01%, lower than other plans, but there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). The D1 of the spinal cord showed no significant difference among the 4 techniques (p = 0.056). All techniques are able to provide a homogeneous and highly conformal dose distribution. The TD technique is a good option for treating upper thoracic EC involvement. It could achieve optimal low dose to the lungs and spinal cord with acceptable PTV coverage. HT is a good option as it could achieve quality dose conformality and uniformity, while TD generated superior conformality.

Zhang Y ，Wang H ，Huang X ，Zhang Q ，Ren R ，Sun R ，Zheng Z ，Dong S ，Zheng A ... -  《-》

[Dosimetric comparison of the helical tomotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in radical radiotherapy for esophageal cancer].

Xu YJ ，Li P ，Hu X ，Wang J ，Ma HL ，Chen M ... -  《-》

Volumetric intensity-modulated Arc (RapidArc) therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3-D conformal radiotherapy.

Kuo YC ，Chiu YM ，Shih WP ，Yu HW ，Chen CW ，Wong PF ，Lin WC ，Hwang JJ ... -  《Radiation Oncology》