Activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is complex and multifaceted. While the novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam inhibit serine-based β-lactamases, the comparative potency of the novel β-lactam (BL)/BLI combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa is unknown. To compare the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftazidime, imipenem/relebactam, imipenem, meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem against serine β-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa. Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were collated through the Enhancing Rational Antimicrobials against Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (ERACE-PA) Global Surveillance. Isolates positive for serine-based carbapenemases were assessed. MICs were determined by broth microdilution to each novel BL/BLI and BL alone. GES was the most common carbapenemase identified (n = 59) followed by KPC (n = 8). Ceftazidime/avibactam had MIC50/MIC90 values of 4/8 mg/L and 91% of isolates were susceptible. Conversely, ceftazidime alone was active against only 3% of isolates. The MIC50/MIC90 of imipenem/relebactam were 16/>16 mg/L and 13% of all isolates were defined as susceptible. Of the KPC-producing isolates, 38% were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam, compared with 0% to imipenem. The meropenem/vaborbactam MIC50/MIC90 were >16/>16 mg/L, and 6% of isolates were susceptible, which was similar to meropenem alone (MIC50/90, >8/>8 mg/L; 3% susceptible) suggesting the addition of vaborbactam cannot overcome co-expressed, non-enzymatic resistance mechanisms. Among the novel BL/BLIs, ceftazidime/avibactam displayed better in vitro activity and thus is a rational treatment option for serine carbapenemase-harbouring P. aeruginosa. While imipenem/relebactam displayed some activity, particularly against isolates with blaKPC, meropenem/vaborbactam exhibited poor activity, with MICs similar to meropenem alone.

Lee SY ，Gill CM ，Nicolau DP ，ERACE-PA Global Study Group ... -  《-》

Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales: a cross-combination and dose-escalation titration study with relebactam and vaborbactam.

Kang MS ，Baek JY ，Ko J-H ，Cho SY ，Lee KY ，Lee YH ，Yang J ，Kim TY ，Huh HJ ，Lee NY ，Huh K ，Kang C-I ，Chung DR ，Peck KR ... -  《Microbiology Spectrum》

Comparative activity of newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US medical centres (2020-2021).

To evaluate the in-vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam and comparator agents against contemporary Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals. In total, 3184 isolates were collected consecutively from 71 US medical centres in 2020-2021, and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute breakpoints were applied. Ceftazidime-avibactam [97.0% susceptible (S)], ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.0%S), imipenem-relebactam (97.3%S) and tobramycin (96.4%S) were the most active agents against the aggregate P. aeruginosa isolate collection, and retained good activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and multi-drug-resistant (MDR) isolates. All other antimicrobials tested showed limited activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and MDR isolates. The most common infections were pneumonia (45.9%), skin and skin structure infections (19.0%), urinary tract infections (17.0%) and bloodstream infections (11.7%); ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam showed consistent activity against isolates from these infection types. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem was lower among isolates from pneumonia compared with other infection types. Ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam were highly active, and exhibited similar coverage against a large contemporary collection of P. aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals. Cross-resistance among the newer β-lactams/β-lactam inhibitors (BL/BLIs) varied markedly; ≥72.1% of isolates resistant to one of the three newer BL/BLIs approved for P. aeruginosa treatment remained susceptible to at least one of the other two BL/BLIs, indicating that all three should be tested in the clinical laboratory. These three BL/BLIs represent valuable therapeutic options for P. aeruginosa infection.

Sader HS ，Mendes RE ，Arends SJR ，Carvalhaes CG ，Shortridge D ，Castanheira M ... -  《-》

Assessing the in vivo impact of novel β-lactamase inhibitors on the efficacy of their partner β-lactams against serine carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa using human-simulated exposures.

Ruiz VH ，Gill CM ，Nicolau DP 《-》

Susceptibility of OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales to imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and ceftazidime/avibactam.

Relebactam and vaborbactam are among the newest β-lactamase inhibitors marketed. They were originally designed to inhibit the Ambler class A carbapenemase KPC. In this study, susceptibility to imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam was determined against a collection of OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales (n = 407). The clonality and resistomes of the isolates were determined by whole-genome sequencing. Comparison was performed with other relevant antibiotics such as carbapenems alone, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam. Addition of relebactam and vaborbactam did not significantly modify the MIC50 and MIC90 values obtained for imipenem and meropenem alone. In contrast, addition of avibactam strongly restored ceftazidime susceptibility. According to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints, MIC50/MIC90 values were at 2/4, 2/4, 2/8, 2/8, 32/>32 and 0.5/2 mg/L for imipenem, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem, meropenem/vaborbactam, ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam, respectively. No differences were observed depending on the species. This study highlights the lack of benefit in vitro for carbapenem/inhibitor combination compared with carbapenem alone against OXA-48-producing isolates as well as the difficulties in comparing molecules since carbapenem/inhibitor combinations were not developed with the same dosage of carbapenem.

Bonnin RA ，Bernabeu S ，Emeraud C ，Creton E ，Vanparis O ，Naas T ，Jousset AB ，Dortet L ... -  《-》