Head to head comparison of (68)Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 vs (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary extrapulmonary tumors in the chest.

We conducted a prospective study using 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 (fibroblast-activation protein inhibitor, 68Ga-FAPI) PET/CT to diagnose, differentiate, and stage primary extrapulmonary tumors of the thorax. Fifty-four participants were undergoing 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and divided into the benign, intermediate, and malignant based on pathology. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the tumor-to-blood pool ratio, and tumor-to-liver ratio were compared for primary tumors, lymph nodes, and metastases between the two modalities by two independent samples t tests. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the uptake of 18F-FDG or 68Ga-FAPI among the three groups. Fifty-four participants were confirmed to have 71 primary lesions, 56 metastatic lymph nodes, and 43 metastatic lesions. 18F-FDG PET/CT could both effectively distinguish malignant lesions from non-malignant lesions, accuracies of 87.32% (p < 0.001). 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT effectively differentiated benign lesions from the non-benign, accuracy being 91.55% (p < 0.001). The accuracies of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI for detecting lymph node metastasis were 77.22% (61/79) and 87.34% (69/79) (p = 0.096). The uptake of 68Ga-FAPI in metastatic lymph nodes was significantly higher than that of the nonmetastatic (p < 0.001). The detection rate of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for metastatic lesions was significantly higher than that of 18F-FDG, 100% (43/43) vs. 53.49% (23/43) (p < 0.001). Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT changed the treatment strategy of 7.4% (4/54) participants. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT is valuable in the diagnosis and differentiation of primary extrapulmonary tumors and superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluating lymph node and distant metastasis. The application of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in primary extrapulmonary chest tumors is valuable, which is reflected in diagnosis, differentiation and exploration of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis. • 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT is valuable in the diagnosis, differentiation, and staging of primary extrapulmonary tumors. • 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT is superior to 18 F-FDG PET/CT for evaluating lymph node and distant metastasis.

Zhang A ，Meng X ，Yao Y ，Zhou X ，Zhang Y ，Li N ... -  《-》

[(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the evaluation of gastric cancer: comparison with [(18)F]FDG PET/CT.

This study aimed to compare the performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary and metastatic lesions of gastric cancer. Fifty-six patients with histologically proven gastric carcinomas were enrolled in this study, including 45 patients for staging and 11 patients for restaging after surgery. Each patient underwent both [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT within 1 week. The activity of tracer accumulation in lesions was assessed by maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and TBR (lesions SUVmax/ascending aorta SUVmean). Histological workup served as a standard of reference. If tissue diagnosis was not applicable, the follow-up data including the results of laboratory tests and medical imaging could also serve as a reference. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT was comparable to [18F]FDG on detecting primary tumors and lymph node (LN) metastases, whereas [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 outperformed [18F]FDG in detecting peritoneal (159 vs. 47, P < 0.001) and bone metastases (64 vs. 55, P = 0.003) by the lesion-based analysis. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 showed higher SUVmax (10.3 vs. 8.1, P = 0.004) and TBR (11.6 vs. 5.8, P < 0.001) in primary tumor, and higher TBR in LN involvement (8.0 vs. 3.7, P < 0.001) and peritoneal metastases (8.1 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001), compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT. The specificity and positive predictive value of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 were significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG (100.0% vs. 97.7%, P < 0.001; 100.0% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.001) in determining the LN status. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 was comparable to [18F]FDG in evaluating N-staging (47.1% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.282). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT detected more positive recurrent lesions in all restaging patients and showed clearer tumor delineation. Two patients underwent follow-up [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT scans after chemotherapy, which both showed remission. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT can better evaluate primary gastric cancer and metastatic lesions in the peritoneum, abdominal LNs, and bone. Furthermore, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT provided more information for patients with recurrent disease and had the potential in monitoring response to treatment.

Lin R ，Lin Z ，Chen Z ，Zheng S ，Zhang J ，Zang J ，Miao W ... -  《-》

The potential utility of [(68) Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 as a novel broad-spectrum oncological and non-oncological imaging agent-comparison with [(18)F]FDG.

This study aimed to compare the detection performance of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the patients with various oncological and non-oncological lesions. A total of 123 patients underwent contemporaneous [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT were included in this prospective study. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was measured to compare oncological and non-oncological lesion uptake. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy of [18F]FDG and [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT for detecting primary, metastatic, and non-oncological lesions were calculated and compared to evaluate the detection efficacy. The study subjects consisted of 123 patients (69 men and 54 women; mean age 56.11 ± 11.94 years). Among the 102 patients with either newly diagnosed (82 patients) or previously treated solid tumor (20 patients), a total of 88 solid primary malignant tumors in 84/102 patients were detected. Two patients had two primary tumors each and 1 patient had three primary tumors. Among them, 58/102 and 43/102 patients had nodal (376 lesions) and distant metastases (406 lesions), respectively. Eight patients had hematological neoplasm. No malignant oncological diseases were detected in the remaining 13 patients. A total of 145 non-oncological lesions and benign tumors in 52/123 patients were detected incidentally. [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated a significantly higher uptake and detection rate for the primary (SUVmax 10.98 ± 5.83 vs. 8.36 ± 6.43, p < 0.001; sensitivity 97.67 vs. 84.89%; and accuracy 96.59 vs. 82.95%, X2 = 0.538, p = 0.021), nodal (SUVmax 10.50 ± 5.98 vs. 8.20 ± 6.29, p = 0.011; sensitivity 97.59 vs. 84.72%; and accuracy 97.34 vs. 84.31%, X2 = 2.067, p < 0.001), and distant metastatic lesions (SUVmax 9.64 ± 6.45 vs. 6.74 ± 4.83; p < 0.001; sensitivity 98.01 vs. 65.59%; and accuracy 97.04 vs. 65.51%, X2 = 4.897, p < 0.001) of solid tumor than did [18F]FDG PET/CT. [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT demonstrated a lower activity (SUVmax: 6.84 ± 4.67 vs. 13.09 ± 7.29, p < 0.001) and detection rate (sensitivity 50.65 vs. 96.75%, and accuracy 51.28 vs. 95.51%, X2 = 5.166, p < 0.001) for multiple myeloma and lymphoma compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT. [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT PET/CT demonstrated a comparative activity (SUVmax 6.40 ± 3.95 vs. 5.74 ± 15.78, p = 0.729) and detection efficacy (sensitivity 86.52 vs. 72.34%, and accuracy 84.83 vs. 72.41%, X2 = 9.460, p = 0.007) for non-oncological lesion and benign tumor detection. Except for myeloma and lymphoma, [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed a superior detection efficacy for detecting various primary and metastatic lesions than [18F]FDG PET/CT. A comparative detection utility for non-oncological lesion was obtained with both tracers. [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 could be used as a broad-spectrum tumor and inflammatory imaging agent in the clinical especially for various solid tumors and non-oncological lesions.

Lan L ，Liu H ，Wang Y ，Deng J ，Peng D ，Feng Y ，Wang L ，Chen Y ，Qiu L ... -  《-》

Head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT for the evaluation of tonsil cancer and lymph node metastases: a single-centre retrospective study.

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging for primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with tonsil cancer. Twenty-one tonsil cancer patients who underwent [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT scans within two weeks in our centre were retrospectively enrolled. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of the two tracers were compared by using the Mann‒Whitney U test. In addition, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes were analysed. In detecting primary lesions, the efficiency was higher for [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (20/22) than for [18F]FDG PET/CT (9/22). Although [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 uptake (SUVmax, 5.03 ± 4.06) was lower than [18F]FDG uptake (SUVmax, 7.90 ± 4.84, P = 0.006), [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 improved the distinction between the primary tumor and contralateral normal tonsillar tissue. The TBR was significantly higher for [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT (3.19 ± 2.06) than for [18F]FDG PET/CT (1.89 ± 1.80) (p < 0.001). In lymph node analysis, SUVmax and TBR were not significantly different between [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT (7.67 ± 5.88 vs. 8.36 ± 6.15, P = 0.498 and 5.56 ± 4.02 vs. 4.26 ± 3.16, P = 0.123, respectively). The specificity and accuracy of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT were higher than those of [18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosing metastatic cervical lymph nodes (all P < 0.05). The availability of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 complements the diagnostic results of [18F]FDG by improving the detection rate of primary lesions and the diagnostic accuracy of cervical metastatic lymph nodes in tonsil cancer compared to [18F]FDG.

Ji M ，Ma G ，Liu C ，Gu B ，Du X ，Ou X ，Xu X ，Song S ，Yang Z ... -  《-》

Head‑to‑head assessment of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT vs [(18)F]FDG PET/CT in fibroblastic tumors.

We aimed to evaluate [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in the application of fibroblastic tumors. Twenty participants with 6 subtypes of fibroblastic tumors prospectively underwent 18F-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT examinations to evaluate the lesions. PET/CT findings were confirmed by surgical pathology of fifteen participants, puncture biopsy of two participants, or imaging follow-up of three participants. Two independent sample t tests were used to compare the uptake of [18F]FDG vs [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in primary, recurrent and metastatic lesions. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the uptake of [18F]FDG or [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 among primary, recurrent, and metastatic lesions. The uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 vs [18F]FDG in different histopathological lesions was compared by two independent sample t tests. Twenty participants were confirmed to have 38 lesions. Although there was no significant difference in the detection of lesions between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT (38 vs 36, p = 0.493), the uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in lesions was significantly higher than that of [18F]FDG (p < 0.001), including primary (p < 0.001), recurrent (p = 0.018) and metastatic (p < 0.001) lesions. The SUVmax of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in primary and recurrent lesions was higher than that in metastasis (p = 0.034 and p = 0.015, respectively). The SUVmax of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in primary and recurrent malignant lesions was significantly higher than that of the intermediate (p < 0.001). The SUVmax of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 in one participant of recurrent SFT with 5 lesions was significantly lower after treatment than before treatment (p = 0.016). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 outperformed [18F]FDG PET/CT in displaying the primary, recurrent and metastatic lesions of fibroblastic tumors.

Zhang A ，Meng X ，Yao Y ，Zhou X ，Zhang Y ，Li N ... -  《-》