Inpatient vs outpatient arthroplasty: A in-state database analysis of 90-day complications.

An increase in the number of policy initiatives, such as alternative payment models, have prompted healthcare providers to examine health-care expenditures while seeking to improve quality of care. Performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the outpatient setting is an attractive option in driving costs down and providing psychological benefits to patients. Concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of same-day discharge protocols warrants further investigation, especially on the state level. Due to the lack of consensus, we aimed to compare: (1) risk factors for outpatient arthroplasty and (2) incidences of postoperative complications between inpatient vs outpatient arthroplasty using an in-state database. Patients who underwent total knee or hip arthroplasty between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 were identified. Data was drawn from the Maryland State Inpatient Database (SID) and Maryland State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD). A total of 7817 patients had TJA within this time. Patients were divided into inpatient arthroplasty (n = 1429) and outpatient arthroplasty (n = 6338). Demographic variables, medical comorbidities, and 90-day complication rates were compared between inpatient and outpatient procedures. Additional independent variables included: marital status, primary language, race, and median household income. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for complications following TJA after controlling for risk factors and patient comorbidities. Arthroplasty in the outpatient setting were more likely to be married (61.3% vs. 51.2%, p < 0.001), white (75.5% vs. 60.9%, <0.001), speak English as primary language (98.7% vs. 88.6%, p < 0.001), and have lower rates of diabetes (4.8% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.3% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001), and obesity (30.0% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) compared to arthroplasty in the inpatient setting, respectively. There were lower incidences of acute kidney injury (0.2 vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001) and infection (0.3% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001) in the outpatient cohort compared to the inpatient cohort, respectively. Inpatient arthroplasty (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.98, 95% CI 1.30-3.02, p = 0.002) and hypertension (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.23-3.64, p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for total complications following TJA. Arthroplasty in the outpatient setting showed fewer complications than compared to patients in the inpatient setting. Although multiple factors should guide the decision for arthroplasty, outpatient arthroplasty may be a safe option for select, healthier patients without the increased burden of increased complications.

Moore MC ，Dubin JA ，Bains SS ，Douglas S ，Hameed D ，Nace J ，Delanois RE ... -  《-》

Assessing social disparities in inpatient vs. outpatient arthroplasty: a in-state database analysis.

Given the growing emphasis on patient outcomes, including postoperative complications, in total joint arthroplasty (TJA), investigating the rise of outpatient arthroplasty is warranted. Concerns exist over the safety of discharging patients home on the same day due to increased readmission and complication rates. However, psychological benefits and lower costs provide an incentive for outpatient arthroplasty. The influence of social determinants of health disparities on outpatient arthroplasty remains unexplored. One metric that assesses social disparities, including the following individual components: socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status, and housing and transportation, is the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). As such, we aimed to compare: (1) mean overall SVI and mean SVI for each component and (2) risk factors for total complications between patients undergoing inpatient and outpatient arthroplasty. Patients who underwent TJA between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 were identified. Data were drawn from the Maryland State Inpatient Database (SID). A total of 7817 patients had TJA within this time period. Patients were divided into inpatient arthroplasty (n = 1429) and outpatient arthroplasty (n = 6338). The mean SVI was compared between inpatient and outpatient procedures for each themed score. The SVI identifies communities that may need support cause by external stresses on human health based on four themed scores: socioeconomic status; household composition and disability; minority status and language; and housing and transportation. The SVI uses the United States Census data to rank census tracts for each individual theme, as well as an overall social vulnerability score. The higher the SVI, the more social vulnerability, or resources needed to thrive in that area. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for total complications following TJA after controlling for risk factors and patient comorbidities. Total complications included: infection, aseptic loosening, dislocation, arthrofibrosis, mechanical complication, pain, and periprosthetic fracture. Patients who had inpatient arthroplasty had higher overall SVI scores (0.45 vs. 0.42, P < 0.001). The SVI scores were higher for patients who had inpatient arthroplasty for socioeconomic status (0.36 vs. 0.32, P < 0.001), minority status and language (0.76 vs. 0.74, P < 0.001), and housing and transportation (0.53 vs. 0.50, P < 0.001) compared to outpatient arthroplasty, respectively. There was no difference between inpatient and outpatient arthroplasty for household composition and disability (0.41 vs. 0.41, P = 0.99). When controlling for comorbidities, inpatient arthroplasty [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.91, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.23-2.95, P = 0.004], hypertension (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.23-3.62, P = 0.007), and housing and transportation (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.17-3.42, P = 0.012) were independent risk factors for total complications. Inpatient arthroplasty was associated with increased social disparities across several components of deprivation as well as an independent risk factor total complications following TJA. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the negative repercussions of inpatient arthroplasty through the lens of social disparities and can target specific areas for intervention.

Dubin J ，Bains S ，LaGreca M ，Gilmor RJ ，Hameed D ，Nace J ，Mont M ，Lundy DW ，Delanois RE ... -  《-》

Complications Following Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of a National Database.

As outpatient total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasties (TKA) increase in popularity, concerns exist about the safety of discharging patients home the same day. The purpose of this study is to determine the complications associated with outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and to identify high-risk patients who should be excluded from these protocols. We queried the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for all patients who underwent primary TKA or THA from 2011 to 2014. Demographic variables, medical comorbidities, and 30-day complication, readmission, and reoperation rates were compared between outpatient and traditional inpatient procedures. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify independent risk factors of poor short-term outcomes. Of the total 169,406 patients who underwent TJA, 1220 were outpatient (0.7%). The outpatient and inpatient groups had an overall complication rate of 8% and 16%, respectively. Patients aged more than 70 years, those with malnutrition, cardiac history, smoking history, or diabetes mellitus are at higher risk for readmission and complications after THA and TKA (all P < .05). Surprisingly, outpatient TJA alone did not increase the risk of readmission (OR 0.652, 95% CI 0.243-1.746, P = .395) or reoperation (OR 1.168, 95% CI 0.374-3.651, P = .789), and was a negative independent risk factor for complications (OR 0.459, 95% CI 0.371-0.567, P < .001). With the resources available in a hospital setting, outpatient TJA may be a safe option, but only in select, healthier patients. Care should be taken to extrapolate these results to an outpatient facility, where complications may be more difficult to manage.

Courtney PM ，Boniello AJ ，Berger RA 《-》

Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Novel "Hyperspecialty" Ambulatory Surgical Center With Extended Care Suites is as Safe as Inpatient Arthroplasty.

New "hyperspecialty" ambulatory surgical centers (HASCs) have been introduced to deliver safe and cost-efficient care, allowing patients to spend additional nights in an extended care suite before discharge. This study compared the 90-day complications and readmissions of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at an HASC and inpatient TJA at a tertiary hospital. We retrospectively reviewed 1365 primary, unilateral, TJAs (658 total hip arthroplasty, 707 total knee arthroplasty) performed at 4 HASCs in 2017-2021. Following their outpatient procedure, patients were discharged to an extended care suite staffed full-time by nurses and physical therapists. These patients were matched 1:1 with 1365 inpatient TJAs (628 total hip arthroplasty, 737 total knee arthroplasty) based on demographics, joint, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Ninety-day complications and readmissions were compared. The mean age was 60.0 ± 9.8 years and 59.4 ± 8.1 years in the inpatient and outpatient groups, respectively (P = .106). There was no difference in ASA≥3 patients (16.4% vs 17.7%; P = .387) and operative time (86.9 ± 31.8 vs 88.7 ± 27.9 minutes; P = .118). Five patients (0.4%) in the outpatient group were transferred to an acute hospital. When comparing 90-day outcomes between the inpatient and outpatient groups, there was no difference in pulmonary embolism (0.1% vs 0.0%; P = .317), mechanical complications (0.3% vs 0.7%; P = .165), periprosthetic joint infections (0.5% vs 1.1%; P = .092), or readmissions (1.2% vs 1.5%; P = .513). A subgroup analysis of ASA≥3 patients yielded similar findings. Patients undergoing outpatient TJA at a novel HASC had similar complication and readmission rates as those undergoing TJA at a tertiary hospital. Based on these data, such facilities seem appropriate for the care of outpatient TJA patients with ASA<4.

Goh GS ，D'Amore T ，Courtney PM ，Hozack WJ ，Krueger CA ... -  《-》

Contemporary Outpatient Arthroplasty Is Safe Compared with Inpatient Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of 574,375 Procedures.

Outpatient joint arthroplasty is a potential modality for increased case throughput and is rising in demand. However, we are aware of no study that has compared outcomes between risk-matched outpatient and inpatient procedures within the last 7 years. The aims of this study were to compare matched patient cohorts who underwent outpatient or inpatient joint arthroplasty in terms of 30-day adverse events and readmission rates. From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) from 2009 to 2018. Using 10 perioperative variables, patients who underwent an outpatient procedure were 1:4 propensity score-matched with patients who underwent an inpatient procedure. The rates of 30-day adverse events and readmission were compared using the McNemar test. The risk factors for adverse events and readmissions were identified using multivariate regression. Of 574,375 patients identified, 21,506 (3.74%) underwent an outpatient procedure. After propensity score matching, an outpatient joint arthroplasty was associated with a lower rate of adverse events (3.18% compared with 7.45%; p < 0.001). When assessed individually, outpatient TKA (3.15% compared with 8.11%; p < 0.001), THA (4.94% compared with 10.05%; p < 0.001), and UKA (1.78% compared with 3.39%; p < 0.001) were all associated with fewer adverse events overall and there was no difference in the rate of 30-day readmission, when compared with inpatient analogs. Outpatient joint arthroplasty was an independent factor for lower adverse events (odds ratio [OR], 0.407 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.369 to 0.449]; p < 0.001), with no increase in the risk of readmission (OR, 1.004 [95% CI, 0.878 to 1.148]; p = 0.951). Contemporary outpatient joint arthroplasty demonstrated lower rates of adverse events with no increased rate of 30-day readmission when compared with risk-matched inpatient counterparts. Although multiple factors should guide the decision for the site of care, outpatient arthroplasty may be a safe alternative to inpatient arthroplasty. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lan RH ，Samuel LT ，Grits D ，Kamath AF ... -  《-》