Extracorporal Membrane Oxygenation in Nonintubated Patients (Awake ECMO) With COVID-19 Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The Israeli Experience.

In this retrospective multicenter observational study, we describe the Israeli experience with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) for the treatment of COVID-19-induced severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which ECMO cannulation was done while the patients were awake and spontaneously breathing without endotracheal tube, namely "awake ECMO." We enrolled all adult patients with severe ARDS due to COVID-19, treated with VV ECMO between March 1, 2020, and November 30, 2021, in which cannulation was done while the patient was awake and spontaneously breathing. During the study period, 365 COVID-19 ARDS patients were treated with VV ECMO. Of these, 25 (6.8%) were treated as awake ECMO. The patient's mean age was 52 years, and 80% were male. Nine of the 25 patients (36%) remained awake throughout their intensive care unit stay and were not sedated and mechanically ventilated at all. Sixteen (64%) were eventually intubated while being on ECMO. Six months survival was 76%. Median mechanical ventilation-free days on ECMO was 8 (interquartile range 5-12) days. This hypothesis-generating study suggests that treating COVID-19 ARDS patients with VV ECMO without sedation and mechanical ventilation is feasible, yet, additional research will be required in order to determine if this modality offers a survival benefit and to identify who are the patients most likely to benefit from it.

Galante O ，Hasidim A ，Almog Y ，Cohen A ，Makhoul M ，Soroksky A ，Zikri-Ditch M ，Fink D ，Ilgiyaev E ，Awake ECMO Research Team ... -  《-》

Optimizing the safety and efficacy of the awake venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS.

Sklienka P ，Burša F ，Frelich M ，Máca J ，Vodička V ，Straková H ，Bílená M ，Romanová T ，Tomášková H ... -  《-》

Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Awake Non-Intubated Patients With COVID-19 ARDS at High Risk for Barotrauma.

To assess the efficacy of an awake venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) management strategy in preventing clinically relevant barotrauma in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at high risk for pneumothorax (PNX)/pneumomediastinum (PMD), defined as the detection of the Macklin-like effect on chest computed tomography (CT) scan. A case series. At the intensive care unit of a tertiary-care institution. Seven patients with COVID-19-associated severe ARDS and Macklin-like radiologic sign on baseline chest CT. Primary VV-ECMO under spontaneous breathing instead of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). All patients received noninvasive ventilation or oxygen through a high-flow nasal cannula before and during ECMO support. The study authors collected data on cannulation strategy, clinical management, and outcome. Failure of awake VV-ECMO strategy was defined as the need for IMV due to worsening respiratory failure or delirium/agitation. The primary outcome was the development of PNX/PMD. No patient developed PNX/PMD. The awake VV-ECMO strategy failed in 1 patient (14.3%). Severe complications were observed in 4 (57.1%) patients and were noted as the following: intracranial bleeding in 1 patient (14.3%), septic shock in 2 patients (28.6%), and secondary pulmonary infections in 3 patients (42.8%). Two patients died (28.6%), whereas 5 were successfully weaned off VV-ECMO and were discharged home. VV-ECMO in awake and spontaneously breathing patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS may be a feasible and safe strategy to prevent the development of PNX/PMD in patients at high risk for this complication.

Paternoster G ，Bertini P ，Belletti A ，Landoni G ，Gallotta S ，Palumbo D ，Isirdi A ，Guarracino F ... -  《-》

Extracorporeal hemoadsorption in critically ill COVID-19 patients on VV ECMO: the CytoSorb therapy in COVID-19 (CTC) registry.

The CytoSorb therapy in COVID-19 (CTC) registry evaluated the clinical performance and treatment parameters of extracorporeal hemoadsorption integrated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) in critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and respiratory failure under US FDA Emergency Use Authorization. Multicenter, observational, registry (NCT04391920). Intensive care units (ICUs) in five major US academic centers between April 2020 and January 2022. A total of 100 critically ill adults with COVID-19-related ARDS requiring VV ECMO support, who were treated with extracorporeal hemoadsorption. None. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory values and outcomes were recorded following individual ethics committee approval at each center. Detailed data on organ support utilization parameters and hemoadsorption treatments were also collected. Biomarker data were collected according to the standard practice at each participating site, and available values were compared before and after hemoadsorption. The primary outcome of mortality was evaluated using a time-to-event analysis. A total of 100 patients (63% male; age 44 ± 11 years) were included. Survival rates were 86% at 30 days and 74% at 90 days. Median time from ICU admission to the initiation of hemoadsorption was 87 h and was used to define two post hoc groups: ≤ 87 h (group-early start, GE) and > 87 h (group-late start, GL). After the start of hemoadsorption, patients in the GE versus GL had significantly shorter median duration of mechanical ventilation (7 [2-26] vs. 17 [7-37] days, p = 0.02), ECMO support (13 [8-24] vs. 29 [14-38] days, p = 0.021) and ICU stay (17 [10-40] vs 36 [19-55] days, p = 0.002). Survival at 90 days in GE was 82% compared to 66% in GL (p = 0.14). No device-related adverse events were reported. In critically ill patients with severe COVID-19-related ARDS treated with the combination of VV-ECMO and hemoadsorption, 90-day survival was 74% and earlier intervention was associated with shorter need for organ support and ICU stay. These results lend support to the concept of "enhanced lung rest" with the combined use of VV-ECMO plus hemoadsorption in patients with ARDS.

Hayanga JWA ，Song T ，Durham L ，Garrison L ，Smith D ，Molnar Z ，Scheier J ，Deliargyris EN ，Moazami N ... -  《CRITICAL CARE》

Does Earlier Cannulation With Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adult Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Decrease Duration of Artificial Mechanical Ventilation?

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by an acute, diffuse, inflammatory lung injury, leading to increased alveolar capillary permeability, increased lung weight, and loss of aerated lung tissue (Fan, Brodie, & Slutsky, 2018). Primary treatment for ARDS is artificial mechanical ventilation (AMV) (Wu, Huang, Wu, Wang, & Lin, 2016). Given recent advances in technology, the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) to treat severe ARDS is growing rapidly (Combes et al., 2014). This 49-month quantitative, retrospective inpatient EMR chart review compared if cannulation with VV-ECMO up to and including 48 hours of admission and diagnosis in adult patients 30 to 65 years of age diagnosed with ARDS, decreased duration on AMV, as compared to participants who were cannulated after 48 hours of admission and diagnosis with ARDS. A total of 110 participants were identified as receiving VV-ECMO during the study timeframe. Of the 58 participants who met all inclusion criteria, 39 participants were cannulated for VV-ECMO within 48 hours of admission and diagnosis with ARDS, and 19 participants were cannulated with VV-ECMO after 48 hours of admission and diagnosis with ARDS. Data collected identified no statistically significant (p < 0.579) difference in length of days on AMV between participant groups. Further studies are needed to determine if earlier initiation of VV-ECMO in adult patients with ARDS decrease time on AMV. Although the results related to length of time on AMV did not produce statistical significance, the decreased duration of AMV in the participants who were cannulated within 48 hours (21 days vs. 27 days) may support several benefits associated with this participant population including increased knowledge of healthcare providers, decreased lung injury, earlier discharge which decreases hospital and patient cost, ability for patients to communicate sooner, decreased risk of pulmonary infection, decreased length of stay, decreased cost, and improved patient and family satisfaction.

Hartner C ，Ochsenreither J ，Miller K ，Weiss M ... -  《-》