The Severity of Chronic Cough Diary (SCCD): development and content validation of a novel patient-reported outcome instrument for evaluating the symptom experience of chronic cough.

Refractory chronic cough (RCC), a cough lasting longer than 8 weeks with an unexplained underlying etiology and unresponsive to conventional treatment, can have substantial effects on patients' quality of life. For assessment of the efficacy of antitussive medication in clinical trials in RCC, patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments should be fit for purpose with appropriate content validity. Here we describe the qualitative testing of a newly developed PRO instrument: the Severity of Chronic Cough Diary (SCCD). The SCCD was developed to assess patients' symptom experience of cough in patients with RCC. A preliminary version was tested and refined based on an iterative process in a qualitative study. In total, three rounds of interviews were conducted with adult participants diagnosed with RCC in the USA (n = 19) and UK (n = 10). Rounds 1-3 consisted of hybrid concept elicitation (CE) interviews and cognitive interviews (CIs), with Round 3 also including interviews in a subset of participants (n = 5) about the usability of the SCCD as administered on an electronic handheld device. The CE interviews identified concepts important to patients' experiences related to RCC that were broadly in line with the concepts in the preliminary version of the SCCD. Participants provided positive feedback on the draft SCCD across all CI rounds, reporting the instrument to be relevant and straightforward to complete, and containing a comprehensive set of concepts to evaluate their symptom experience of RCC. Participants demonstrated a good understanding of proposed item wording, response options, and the 24-hour recall period, and thought completion of the SCCD on the electronic device was easy. Following revisions based on results from each interview round, the SCCD at the end of this qualitative research study had 14 items assessing the concepts of: cough symptoms (five items), symptoms related to cough (four items), disruption to activities due to cough (three items), and disruption to sleep due to cough (two items). The results of this study provide qualitative evidence supporting the content validity of the SCCD as a PRO instrument for evaluating outcomes of therapies for RCC in clinical trials.

de la Orden Abad M ，Haberland C ，Karn H ，Skalicky A ，Hareendran A ... -  《-》

Content validity of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in adults with refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a qualitative interview study.

Martin Nguyen A ，La Rosa C ，Cornell AG ，Sher MR ，Bernstein JA ，Birring SS ，DeMuro Romano C ，Mayorga M ，Milien M ，Ervin C ... -  《-》

Assessing asthma symptoms in children: qualitative research supporting the development of the Pediatric Asthma Diary-Child (PAD-C) and Pediatric Asthma Diary-Observer (PAD-O).

Pediatric asthma has been identified by regulators, clinicians, clinical trial sponsors, and caregivers as an area in need of novel fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments (COAs) developed in accordance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) regulatory guidance for evaluating clinical benefit in treatment trials. To address this gap, the Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Consortium's Pediatric Asthma Working Group has continued development of 2 COAs to assess asthma signs and symptoms in pediatric asthma clinical trials to support efficacy endpoints: a PRO measure, the Pediatric Asthma Diary-Child (PAD-C) for children 8-11 years old (y.o.) and an observer-reported outcome measure, the Pediatric Asthma Diary-Observer (PAD-O) for caregivers of children 4-11 y.o. This qualitative research aimed to generate evidence regarding the content validity of the PAD-C and PAD-O. Semi-structured combined concept elicitation and cognitive interviews were conducted with a diverse sample of U.S. participants (15 children 8-11 y.o. and 30 caregivers of children 4-11 y.o.). All children had clinician-diagnosed mild to severe asthma. Interviews explored the experience of pediatric asthma and assessed the understanding and relevance of both measures. Interviews were conducted across 3 iterative rounds to allow for modifications. Concept elicitation findings demonstrated that the core sign/symptom and impact concepts assessed in the PAD-C (cough, hard to breathe, out of breath, wheezing, chest tightness, and nighttime awakenings/symptoms) and PAD-O (cough, difficulty breathing, short of breath, wheezing, and nighttime awakenings/signs) correspond to those most frequently reported by participants; concept saturation was achieved. All PAD-C and PAD-O instructions and core items were well understood and considered relevant by most participants. Feedback from participants, the Pediatric Asthma Working Group, advisory panel, and FDA supported modifications to the measures, including addition of 1 new item to both measures and removal of 1 caregiver item. Findings provide strong support for the content validity of both measures. The cross-sectional measurement properties of both measures and their user experience and feasibility in electronic format will be assessed in a future quantitative pilot study with qualitative exit interviews, intended to support the reliability, construct validity, final content, and, ultimately, FDA qualification of the measures.

Bradley H ，Trennery C ，Jones AM ，Lydon A ，White F ，Williams-Hall R ，Arbuckle R ，Tomaszewski E ，Shih VH ，Haughney J ，Eisen A ，Winders T ，Coons SJ ，Eremenco S ，Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium’s Pediatric Asthma Working Group ... -  《-》

Patient-reported experiences with refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a qualitative analysis.

Bali V ，Schelfhout J ，Sher MR ，Tripathi Peters A ，Patel GB ，Mayorga M ，Goss D ，Romano CD ... -  《-》

Qualitative Development and Content Validity of the Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (NSCLC-SAQ), A Patient-reported Outcome Instrument.

The purpose of this article was to describe the process and results of the preliminary qualitative development of a new symptoms-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure intended for assessing treatment benefit in clinical trials of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Individual qualitative interviews were conducted in adults with NSCLC (Stages I-IV) in the United States. Experienced interviewers conducted concept-elicitation (CE) and cognitive interviews using semistructured interview guides. The CE interview guide was used for eliciting spontaneous reports of symptom experiences along with probing to further explore and confirm concepts. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed by professional qualitative coders, and were summarized by like content using an iterative coding framework. Data from the CE interviews were considered alongside existing literature and clinical expert opinion during an item-generation process, leading to the development of a preliminary version of the NSCLC Symptom Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). Three waves of cognitive interviews were conducted to evaluate concept relevance, item interpretability, and structure of the draft items and to facilitate further instrument refinement. Fifty-one subjects (mean [SD] age, 64.9 [11.2] years; 51.0% women) participated in the CE interviews. A total of 1897 expressions of NSCLC-related symptoms were identified and coded in interview transcripts, representing ~42 distinct symptom concepts. A 9-item initial-draft instrument was developed for testing in 3 waves of cognitive interviews with additional subjects with NSCLC (n = 20), during which both paper and electronic versions of the instrument were evaluated and refined. Participant responses and feedback during cognitive interviews led to the removal of 2 items and substantial modifications to others. The NSCLC-SAQ is a 7-item PRO measure intended for use in advanced NSCLC clinical trials to support medical product labelling. The NSCLC-SAQ uses a 7-day recall period and verbal rating scales. It was developed in accordance with the US Food and Drug Administration's PRO Guidance and scientific best practices, and the resulting qualitative interview data provide evidence of content validity. The NSCLC-SAQ has been prepared in both paper and electronic administration formats and a tablet computer-based version is currently undergoing quantitative testing to confirm its measurement properties and support US Food and Drug Administration qualification.

McCarrier KP ，Atkinson TM ，DeBusk KP ，Liepa AM ，Scanlon M ，Coons SJ ，Patient-Reported Outcome Consortium, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Working Group ... -  《-》