Hypersensitivity reaction during enzyme replacement therapy in lysosomal storage disorders. A systematic review of desensitization strategies.

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are rare genetic metabolic disorders that cause the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans in lysosomes due to enzyme deficiency or reduced function. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) represents the gold standard treatment, but hypersensitivity reaction can occur resulting in treatment discontinuation. Thus, desensitization procedures for different culprit recombinant enzymes can be performed to restore ERT. We searched desensitization procedures performed in LSDs and focused on skin test results, protocols and premedication performed, and breakthrough reactions occurred during infusions. Fifty-two patients have been subjected to desensitization procedures successfully. Skin tests, with the culprit recombinant enzyme, deemed positive in 29 cases, doubtful in two cases, and not performed in four patients. Moreover, 29 of the 52 desensitization protocols used at the first infusion were breakthrough reaction free. Different desensitization strategies have proved safe and effective in restoring ERT in patients with previous hypersensitivity reactions. Most of these events seem to be Type I hypersensitivity reactions (IgE-mediated). Standardized in vivo and in vitro testing is necessary to better estimate the risk of the procedure and find the safest individualized desensitization protocol.

Spataro F ，Carlucci P ，Loverre T ，Macchia L ，Di Bona D ... -  《-》

Management of hypersensitivity reactions to enzyme replacement therapy in children with lysosomal storage diseases.

Intravenous recombinant enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is currently available for 8 lysosomal diseases. Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) may be observed during this long-term treatment. To evaluate the frequency and clinical treatment features of ERT HSRs and the management of desensitizations in children. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively for patients who received ERT. Those who had experienced HSRs to ERT were included in the study. The demographic characteristics of the patients, culprit enzyme, signs and symptoms, diagnostic tests, management of the reaction, and the protocol employed for the maintenance of ERT were recorded. During the study period, 54 patients received ERT in our institution. A total of 11 patients (20.4%) experienced HSR to ERT. All reactions were of immediate type. The most common symptoms were cutaneous manifestations. A total of 9 patients experienced urticaria, and 2 had anaphylaxis as initial reaction. Patients who had isolated cutaneous symptoms continued their treatments with antihistamines, corticosteroid premedication, slower infusion rate or both. Patients who had recurrent urticaria with these modalities or those who had anaphylaxis continued their ERT with desensitization (n = 8). A total of 3 patients required revisions in desensitization protocols because of recurrent anaphylaxis. The reactions that develop during this long-term treatment may be treated by premedication-prolonged infusion, but in some patients, desensitization protocols are necessary for the continuation of therapy. Revisions in desensitization protocols may be required.

Turgay Yagmur I ，Unal Uzun O ，Kucukcongar Yavas A ，Kulhas Celik I ，Toyran M ，Gunduz M ，Civelek E ，Dibek Misirlioglu E ... -  《-》

Allergic reactions to enzyme replacement therapy in children with lysosomal storage diseases and their management.

Human recombinant enzyme replacement therapy, given to compensate for genetic enzyme deficiency in lysosomal storage diseases, delays the progression of the disease and improves the quality of life. However, enzyme replacement therapy may cause hypersensitivity reactions. Within the scope of this research, we aimed to elucidate the frequency and clinical features of hypersensitivity reactions against enzyme replacement therapy in children with lysosomal storage diseases and clarify the management of these reactions. Medical records of pediatric patients with lysosomal storage disease and receiving enzyme replacement therapy were retrospectively reviewed, and patients who experienced allergic reactions were included in the study. The demographic characteristics of the patients, their diagnosis, the responsible enzyme, the time at which the reaction started and at what dose, the signs and symptoms associated with the reaction, diagnostic tests, the management of the reaction, and the protocol applied for the maintenance of enzyme replacement therapy after the reaction were recorded. Hypersensitivity reactions developed in 18 of 71 patients (25.3 %) who received enzyme replacement therapy. The most common cutaneous findings were observed. Anaphylaxis developed in 6 of 18 patients. Patients who experienced recurrent hypersensitivity reactions with premedication or a slower infusion rate, those with positive skin test results, and patients who developed anaphylaxis were given enzyme replacement therapy with desensitization. HSR may develop during enzyme replacement therapy, which are vital in lysosomal storage diseases, and discontinuation of enzyme replacement therapy is a significant loss for patients with metabolic disorders. These reactions can be treated with premedication and long-term infusions, but some patients may require desensitization protocols for continued treatment.

Arik E ，Keskin Ö ，Albayrak S ，Keskin M ，Cesur M ，Karaoglan M ，Inal G ，Yildirim A ，Kucukosmanoglu E ... -  《-》

Novel approach to idursulfase and laronidase desensitization in type 2 and type 1 S mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS).

Idursulfase and laronidase are drugs used to treat Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type 2) and Scheie syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type 1 S), respectively. These are rare lysosomal storage disorders, leading to accumulation of glycosaminoglycans within lysosomes. Failure of early recognition of the disease and/or delay in starting the appropriate treatment result in severe clinical impairment and death. For almost 20 years, enzyme replacement therapy with recombinant proteins has represented the first line therapeutic option. However, administration of idursulfase and laronidase is associated with infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions, in approx. 20% of patients. In these patients, rapid desensitization by intravenous administration protocols has been used in order to avoid treatment discontinuation. This approach proved effective and safe. However, long-term tolerance could not be achieved. Thus, we decided to combine rapid desensitization with allergen immunotherapy-like desensitization. Two patients with Hunter syndrome and one patient with Scheie syndrome developed severe allergy to idursulfase and laronidase, respectively, preventing them from continuing the otherwise indispensable therapy. In all three patients, the possible IgE-mediated nature of the reactions suffered was suggested by positive skin tests with the two enzymes, respectively. By devising 12-step, 3-dilution rapid desensitization protocols, we resumed the enzyme replacement therapy. However, the prolonged time required for administration (a not negligible pitfall, since therapy should be given weekly for life) and the persistent occurrence of reactions (mild but still requiring anti-allergic medication at full dosage) led us to combine rapid desensitization with a compact 11-step, 24-day allergen immunotherapy-like desensitization protocol. Thus, idursulfase and laronidase were injected subcutaneously, with a 500-fold increase from step 1 to step 11 for idursulfase and a 222-fold increase for laronidase. This strategy led to restoration of long-term tolerance, allowing weekly intravenous therapy administration under standard conditions, according to the manufacturer instructions, in the absence of side effects and with only precautionary low-dose premedication. Rapid desensitization is a suitable and safe option in the case of idursulfase and laronidase allergy. Combination with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy-like desensitization afforded restoration of enzyme replacement therapy given by the normal administration schedule, by inducing sustained tolerance.

Spataro F ，Viggiani F ，Macchia DG ，Rollo V ，Tummolo A ，Suppressa P ，Sabba' C ，Rossi MP ，Giliberti L ，Satriano F ，Nettis E ，Di Bona D ，Caiaffa MF ，Fischetto R ，Macchia L ... -  《-》

Abbreviation of Desensitization Protocol for Pediatric Patients with Lysosomal Storage Diseases Receiving Enzyme Replacement Therapy.

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) constitute a group of metabolic disorders characterized by the accumulation of substrates within lysosomes. For their treatment, disease-specific enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is employed. In cases of hypersensitivity reactions that may occur during these treatments, desensitization of enzyme therapy becomes necessary. Repeated desensitization procedures may result some degree of tolerance. This study presents cases of patients received abbreviated desensitization protocols following repeated desensitization procedures. During the period between September 2019 and January 2024, pediatric patients who experienced anaphylactic reactions to ERT and whose desensitization protocols were abbreviated after receiving uneventful treatment with desensitization for at least a year were included in the study. Six patients, four with Pompe disease, one with mucopolysaccharidosis type 2, and one with mucopolysaccharidosis type 4, had been receiving uninterrupted ERT by desensitization for at least 1 year. The mean age of the patients was 117.6 months (median: 104.5, IQR: 85.2-144). All patients experienced anaphylaxis as the initial reaction. Skin and intradermal tests were repeated on patients prior to protocol abbreviation. Premedication previously given to all patients was discontinued, and desensitization protocols were subsequently shortened by increasing the infusion rate and/or reducing the number of steps. The study investigated patients whose desensitization protocols were abbreviated. It demonstrated that some level of tolerance could be attained through repeated applications. This approach aims to identify concise, safe, and efficient protocols, thereby reducing hospitalizations, nosocomial infections, and treatment expenses.

Yörüsün G ，Yilmaz Topal Ö ，Şengül Emeksiz Z ，Küçükçongar Yavaş A ，Kasapkara ÇS ，Dibek Mısırlıoğlu E ... -  《-》