Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.

Targeting biopsy (TBx) of suspicious lesions combined with random systematic biopsy (SBx) improves detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy. However, this combination increases the number of biopsy cores, prolongs the procedure time, and increases complications and costs, leading to the overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa). This study aims to evaluate the optimal sampling design to achieve a detection rate of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) equal to standard TBx with SBx with fewer biopsy cores. Of 508 consecutive men who underwent transperineal MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy at our center between January 2020 and December 2022, 364 patients with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI were included in the study. Three biopsy strategies were randomly selected to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PCa detection: (1) TBx with ipsilateral SBx, (2) TBx with contralateral SBx, and (3) TBx only. The PCa detection sensitivity for selected biopsy strategies was compared with the reference standards. The significance of differences in cancer detection between sampling schemes was determined using McNemar's test. PCa was diagnosed in 182 of 364 men using TBx with bilateral SBx. International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP GG) ≥ 2 and ISUP GG ≥ 3 PCa was detected in 84/364 (23.1%) and 42/364 (11.5%), respectively, while ISUP GG 1 PCa was diagnosed in 98/364 (26.9%). Combining TBx with ipsilateral SBx detected 94.5% of all, 98.8% of ISUP GG ≥ 2, 100% of ISUP GG ≥ 3, and 89.8% of ISUP GG 1 PCa. TBx with contralateral SBx detected fewer csPCa (91.7% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.03), as did TBx alone (90.5 vs. 98.8, p = 0.008). Our study demonstrates that TBx with ipsilateral SBx performed around the multiparametric MRI-suspected lesion in transperineal MRI/US biopsy of the prostate achieves a very high detection rate for csPCa (ISUP ≥ 2) without compromising the detection of increased risk PCa (ISUP ≥ 3). In addition, this strategy reduces the number of biopsy cores by 8-10 per patient, procedure time, and pathology processing costs and decreases ciPCa detection.

Yusim I ，Mazor E ，Frumkin E ，Jabareen M ，Hefer B ，Elsaraya N ，Li S ，Rouvinov K ，Novack V ，Mabjeesh NJ ... -  《-》

Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.

To determine the implications of different prostate sampling schemes on the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCA, ISUP group 2-5) and clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCA, ISUP group 1) in men with abnormal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) undergoing MRI-transrectal ulrasound fusion targeted biopsies. This is a retrospective analysis of a cohort including all men who had a single lesion on mpMRI of the prostate performed between January 2016 and June 2017. All men underwent an MRI-transrectal ulrasound fusion biopsy and systematic (SBx) sampling of the prostate, which combined and were considered the standard of reference. The hypothetical 3 biopsy sampling schemes were defined as follows: Targeted biopsy only (TBx), TBx + ipsilateral SBx (ipsi-SBx) and TBx + contralateral SBx (contra-SBx) and were evaluated for the detection of csPCA and ciPCA. Sensitivity and 95% intervals were calculated, McNemar test was used to compare sensitivities between the various sampling schemes. TBx + SBx detected csPCa in 47% (55 of 116) of the 116 men who met eligibility criteria. Sensitivity and 95% confidence intervals for csPCa detection was 85.5% (73.3%-93.5%), 96.4% (87.5%-99.6%), and 92.7 (82.4%-98%) for TBx alone, TBx + ipsi-SBx and TBx + contra-SBx, respectively. csPCa detection rates were higher for both TBx + ipsi-SBx and TBx + contra-SBx compared to TBx alone. Clinically insignificant cancers alone were detected in 7.7% (9 of 116), 10.3% (12 of 116), and 14.6% (17 of 116) of the cohort by TBx only and TBx + ipsi-SBx, and TBx + contra-SBx, respectively. TBx + ipsi-SBx may increase the detection of csPCa while limiting overdiagnosis of indolent cancers.

Freifeld Y ，Xi Y ，Passoni N ，Woldu S ，Hornberger B ，Goldberg K ，Bagrodia A ，Raj G ，Margulis V ，Cadeddu JA ，Lotan Y ，Francis F ，Pedrosa I ，G Roehrborn C ，Costa DN ... -  《-》

Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.

To compare prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of transperineal template-guided saturation prostate biopsy (SBx) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy (TBx). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 392 men who underwent SBx and TBx in case of suspicious lesions from November 2016 to October 2019. Triggers for a biopsy were an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or positive digital rectal examination and only treatment naïve patients without a previous diagnosis of PCa were included. Study inclusion occurred before biopsy and a prebiopsy mpMRI was available in all men. SBx were taken from 20 different locations according to the modified Barzell zones. The primary endpoint was the detection rate of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and insignificant PCa (ciPCa) by SBx and/or TBx by comparing the two methods alone and in combination. Additional TBx were taken for any prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) lesion ≥3 seen on the mpMRI. csPCa was defined as any Gleason score ≥7 and ciPCa as Gleason score 6. A total of 392 men with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-69), a median PSA of 7.0 ng/ml (IQR: 4.8-10.1) were enrolled. Overall, PCa was found in 200 (51%) of all biopsied men, with 158 (79%) being csPCa and 42 (21%) ciPCa. A total of 268 (68%) men with a suspicious mpMRI and underwent a combined TBx and SBx, of whom csPCa was found in 139 (52%). In this subgroup, 116/139 (83%) csPCa would have been detected by TBx alone, and an additional 23 (17%) were found by SBx. Men with a negative mpMRI (PI-RADS < 3, n = 124, 32%) were found to have csPCa in 19 (15%) cases. In patients with a negative mpMRI in combination with a PSA density <0.1 ng/ml2 , only 8% (3/36) had csPCa. If only TBx would have been performed and all men with a negative mpMRI would not have been biopsed, 42/158 (27%) of csPCa would have been missed, and 38/42 (90%) ciPCa would have not been detected. On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of csPCa were increasing PSA (odds ratio, OR: 1.07 [95% confidence interval, CI: 1.03-1.11]), increasing age (OR: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.03-1.11]), PI-RADS score ≥ 3 (OR: 6.49 [95% CI: 3.55-11.89]), and smaller prostate volume (OR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.95 -0.97] (p < 0.05 for all parameters). In comparison to SBx, TBx alone detects csPCa in only ¾ of all men with a positive mpMRI lesion. Thus, systematic biopsies in addition to TBx have to be considered at least in some who undergo a prostate biopsy. In men with a negative mpMRI, SBx still detects 15% csPCa, but similarly overdetecting ciPCa. According to our results, low PSA density and negative mpMRI findings could be used to decide which men can safely avoid biopsy.

Kaufmann B ，Saba K ，Schmidli TS ，Stutz S ，Bissig L ，Britschgi AJ ，Schaeren E ，Gu A ，Langenegger N ，Sulser T ，Eberli D ，Keller EX ，Hermanns T ，Poyet C ... -  《-》

Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.

To compare and evaluate a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) strategy, contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging (CUDI)-TBx strategy and systematic biopsy (SBx) strategy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve men. A prospective, single-centre paired diagnostic study included 150 biopsy-naïve men, from November 2015 to November 2018. All men underwent pre-biopsy mpMRI and CUDI followed by a 12-core SBx taken by an operator blinded from the imaging results. Men with suspicious lesions on mpMRI and/or CUDI also underwent MRI-TRUS fusion-TBx and/or cognitive CUDI-TBx after SBx by a second operator. A non-inferiority analysis of the mpMRI- and CUDI-TBx strategies in comparison with SBx for International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group [GG] ≥2 PCa in any core with a non-inferiority margin of 1 percentage point was performed. Additional analyses for GG ≥2 PCa with cribriform growth pattern and/or intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC), and GG ≥3 PCa were performed. Differences in detection rates were tested using McNemar's test with adjusted Wald confidence intervals. After enrolment of 150 men, an interim analysis was performed. Both the mpMRI- and CUDI-TBx strategies were inferior to SBx for GG ≥2 PCa detection and the study was stopped. SBx found significantly more GG ≥2 PCa: 39% (56/142), as compared with 29% (41/142) and 28% (40/142) for mpMRI-TBx and CUDI-TBx, respectively (P < 0.05). SBx found significantly more GG = 1 PCa: 14% (20/142) compared to 1% (two of 142) and 3% (four of 142) with mpMRI-TBx and CUDI-TBx, respectively (P < 0.05). Detection of GG ≥2 PCa with CR/IDC and GG ≥3 PCa did not differ significantly between the strategies. The mpMRI- and CUDI-TBx strategies were comparable in detection but the mpMRI-TBx strategy had less false-positive findings (18% vs 53%). In our study in biopsy-naïve men, the mpMRI- and CUDI-TBx strategies had comparable PCa detection rates, but the mpMRI-TBX strategy had the least false-positive findings. Both strategies were inferior to SBx for the detection of GG ≥2 PCa, despite reduced detection of insignificant GG = 1 PCa. Both strategies did not significantly differ from SBx for the detection of GG ≥2 PCa with CR/IDC and GG ≥3 PCa.

Mannaerts CK ，Engelbrecht MRW ，Postema AW ，van Kollenburg RAA ，Hoeks CMA ，Savci-Heijink CD ，Van Sloun RJG ，Wildeboer RR ，De Reijke TM ，Mischi M ，Wijkstra H ... -  《-》

Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.

Transperineal (TP) multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) has been shown to detect more clinically significant (cs) prostate cancer (PCa) than standard template biopsies (SBx). Current data supports the inclusion of both TBx and SBx in obtaining an optimal csPCa detection rate. We compared csPCa detection rates in patients with different prostate volumes to examine the benefit of performing TBx in smaller prostates through the TP approach. We identified all men who with suspicious lesions on mpMRI and underwent TP TBx (3-core) and concomitant SBx (20-core) in our single hospital from September 2019 to February 2021. Clinical, MRI and biopsy pathological characteristics were evaluated and compared between TBx and SBx. Grade group 2 or greater prostate adenocarcinoma was defined as csPCa. Three hundred and one (n = 301) men were included. The median prostate volume by MRI was 45 ml. The patients were divided by prostate volume into three groups: ≤30ml group (19.9%), >30 to ≤45 ml group (31.3%) and >45ml group (48.8%). Patients in the ≤30ml group showed significantly higher frequency of combined (both TBx and/or SBx) csPCa detection rate (65.0%) than patients in the >45ml group (39.5%) but similar frequency to the >30 to ≤45 ml group (54.2%,). By TBx only (55.0% vs 27.9%) or by SBx only (56.7% vs. 34.0%), patients in the ≤30ml group consistently showed significantly higher rates of csPCa detection than patients in the >45 ml group. In the ≤30ml group, the detection rate of csPCa was comparable by TBx, SBx or when combined. Four of 6 csPCa cases missed by TBx but detected by SBx were present at the base location. Our data suggest that performing TBx with limited additional cores may potentially achieve the same csPCa detection rate as the combined SBx and TBx in smaller prostates.

Dahl DM ，Kim MM ，Wu S ，Lin SX ，Crotty RK ，Cornejo KM ，Harisinghani MG ，Feldman AS ，Wu CL ... -  《-》