Improved Differential Diagnosis Based on BI-RADS Descriptors and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Breast Lesions: A Multiparametric MRI Analysis as Compared to Kaiser Score.

To develop the nomogram utilizing the American College of Radiology BI-RADS descriptors, clinical features, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. A total of 341 lesions (161 malignant and 180 benign) were included. Clinical data and imaging features were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the independent variables. ADC as a continuous or classified into binary form with a cutoff value of 1.30 × 10-3 mm2/s, incorporated other independent predictors to construct two nomograms, respectively. Receiver operating curve and calibration plot was employed to test the models' discriminative ability. The diagnostic performance between the developed model and the Kaiser score (KS) was also compared. In both models, high patient age, the presence of root sign, time-intensity curves (TICs) types (plateau and washout), heterogenous internal enhancement, the presence of peritumoral edema, and ADC were independently associated with malignancy. The AUCs of two multivariable models (AUC, 0.957; 95% CI: 0.929-0.976 and AUC, 0.958; 95% CI: 0.931-0.976) were significantly higher than that of the KS (AUC, 0.919, 95% CI: 0.885-0.946; both P < 0.001). At the same sensitivity of 95.7%, our models showed an increase in specificity by 5.56% (P = 0.076) and 6.11% (P = 0.035), respectively, as compared to the KS. The models incorporating MRI features (root sign, TIC, margins, internal enhancement, and presence of edema), quantitative ADC value, and patient age showed improved diagnostic performance and might have avoided more unnecessary biopsies in comparison with the KS, although further external validation is required.

Meng L ，Zhao X ，Guo J ，Lu L ，Cheng M ，Xing Q ，Shang H ，Zhang B ，Chen Y ，Zhang P ，Zhang X ... -  《-》

Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy.

The MRI Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon recommends that a breast MRI protocol contain T2 -weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI sequences. The addition of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) significantly improves diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to clarify which descriptors from DCE-MRI, DWI, and T2 -weighted imaging are most strongly associated with a breast cancer diagnosis. To develop a multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) model for breast cancer diagnosis incorporating American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS recommended descriptors for breast MRI with DCE, T2 -weighted imaging, and DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. Retrospective. In all, 188 patients (mean 51.6 years) with 210 breast tumors (136 malignant and 74 benign) who underwent mpMRI from December 2010 to September 2014. IR inversion recovert DCE-MRI dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging VIBE Volume-Interpolated-Breathhold-Examination FLASH turbo fast-low-angle-shot TWIST Time-resolved angiography with stochastic Trajectories. Two radiologists in consensus and another radiologist independently evaluated the mpMRI data. Characteristics for mass (n = 182) and nonmass (n = 28) lesions were recorded on DCE and T2 -weighted imaging according to BI-RADS, as well as DWI descriptors. Two separate models were analyzed, using DCE-MRI BI-RADS descriptors, T2 -weighted imagines, and ADCmean as either a continuous or binary form using a previously published ADC cutoff value of ≤1.25 × 10-3 mm2 /sec for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Histopathology was the standard of reference. χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Pearson correlation coefficient, multivariate logistic regression analysis, Hosmer-Lemeshow test of goodness-of-fit, receiver operating characteristics analysis. In Model 1, ADCmean (P = 0.0031), mass margins with DCE (P = 0.0016), and delayed enhancement with DCE (P = 0.0016) were significantly and independently associated with breast cancer diagnosis; Model 2 identified ADCmean (P = 0.0031), mass margins with DCE (P = 0.0012), initial enhancement (P = 0.0422), and delayed enhancement with DCE (P = 0.0065) to be significantly independently associated with breast cancer diagnosis. T2 -weighted imaging variables were not included in the final models. DATA CONCLUSION: mpMRI with DCE-MRI and DWI with ADC mapping enables accurate breast cancer diagnosis. A model using quantitative and qualitative descriptors from DCE-MRI and DWI identifies breast cancer with a high diagnostic accuracy. T2 -weighted imaging does not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis. 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:864-874.

Zhang M ，Horvat JV ，Bernard-Davila B ，Marino MA ，Leithner D ，Ochoa-Albiztegui RE ，Helbich TH ，Morris EA ，Thakur S ，Pinker K ... -  《-》

Combining b2500 diffusion-weighted imaging with BI-RADS improves the specificity of breast MRI.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of visual assessment of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) obtained with a b value of 2500 s/mm2 in addition to a conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol to characterize breast lesions. This single-institution retrospective study included participants who underwent clinically indicated breast MRI and breast biopsy from May 2017 to February 2020. The examination included a conventional MRI protocol including DWI obtained with a b value of 50 s/mm2 (b50DWI) and a b value of 800 s/mm2 (b800DWI) and DWI obtained with a b value of 2500 s/mm2 (b2500DWI). Lesions were classified using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) categories. Three independent radiologists assessed qualitatively the signal intensity within the breast lesions relative to breast parenchyma on b2500DW and b800DWI and measured the b50-b800-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value. The diagnostic performances of BI-RADS, b2500DWI, b800DWI, ADC and of a model combining b2500DWI and BI-RADS were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis. A total of 260 patients with 212 malignant and 100 benign breast lesions were included. There were 259 women and one man with a median age of 53 years (Q1, Q3: 48, 66 years). b2500DWI was assessable in 97% of the lesions. Interobserver agreement for b2500DWI was substantial (Fleiss kappa = 0.77). b2500DWI yielded larger area under the ROC curve (AUC, 0.81) than ADC with a 1 × 10-3 mm2/s threshold (AUC, 0.58; P = 0.005) and than b800DWI (AUC, 0.57; P = 0.02). The AUC of the model combining b2500DWI and BI-RADS was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.88). Adding b2500DWI to BI-RADS resulted in a significant increase in specificity from 25% (95% CI: 17-35) to 73% (95% CI: 63-81) (P < 0.001) with a decrease in sensitivity from 100% (95% CI: 97-100) to 94% (95% CI: 90-97), (P < 0.001). Visual assessment of b2500DWI has substantial interobserver agreement. Visual assessment of b2500DWI offers better diagnostic performance than ADC and b800DWI. Adding visual assessment of b2500DWI to BI-RADS improves the specificity of breast MRI and could avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Saccenti L ，Mellon CM ，Scholer M ，Jolibois Z ，Stemmer A ，Weiland E ，de Bazelaire C ... -  《Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging》

Diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score for contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in breast masses: A Comparative Study.

The Kaiser score (KS) is a simple and intuitive machine-learning derived decision rule for characterizing breast lesions in a clinical setting and screening for breast cancer. The present study aims to investigate the applicability of the KS for contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in breast masses, and to compare its diagnostic accuracy with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CEM may provide an alternative option for patients with breast masses, especially for those with MRI contraindications. Two hundred and seventy-five patients with breast enhanced masses were included in the study from May 2019 to September 2022. Patients were further divided into benign and malignant groups based on pathological diagnosis. The CEM and MRI imaging characteristics of these two groups were analyzed statistically. The paired chi-square and Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) analysis were used to compare imaging characteristics between CEM and MRI. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and KS for CEM and MRI were evaluated based on imaging characteristics. The diagnostic performance of BI-RADS and KS for CEM and MRI was assessed and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and DeLong's test. The imaging characteristics of root sign, time-signal intensity curve (TIC/mTIC), margin, internal enhancement pattern (IEP), edema, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and suspicious malignant microcalcifications showed significant differences between benign and malignant lesions (all p ≤ 0.011). The detection rate of root sign and margin showed substantial agreement between CEM and MRI (κ = 0.656, κ = 0.640), but IEP, TIC/mTIC, and edema showed poor agreement (κ = 0.380, κ = 0.320, κ = 0.324). For all lesion analyses, the area under the curves (AUCs) of the KS (0.897 ∼ 0.932) were higher than that of BI-RADS (0.691) in CEM (all p < 0.001). The AUC of KS (calcification)-CEM (0.932) was higher than those of both KS-CEM and KS (edema)-CEM (0.897 and 0.899) (all p < 0.001). For subgroup analyses, the AUCs of the KS (0.875 ∼ 0.876) were higher than that of BI-RADS (0.740) in MRI (all p < 0.001). The AUCs of KS-MRI (0.876) and KS (ADC)-MRI (0.875) were similar to those of KS-CEM (0.878) and KS (edema)-CEM (0.870) (all p > 0.100). The AUC of KS (calcification)-CEM (0.934) was slightly higher than those of both KS-MRI (0.876) and KS (ADC)-MRI (0.875), but no significant difference was observed (p = 0.051; p = 0.071). The KS for CEM provided high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing breast masses, comparable to that of MRI. The application of KS (calcification)-CEM combined with suspicious malignant microcalcifications can improve diagnostic efficiency with an AUC of 0.932 ∼ 0.934. However, edema did not significantly improve performance when using the KS for CEM.

Hua B ，Yang G ，Wang Y ，Chen J ，Rong X ，Yuan T ，Quan G ... -  《-》

Contrasts Between Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR in Diagnosing Malignancies of Breast Nonmass Enhancement Lesions Based on Morphologic Assessment.

Nonmass enhancement (NME) breast lesions are considered to be the leading cause of unnecessary biopsies. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences are typically used to differentiate between benign and malignant NMEs. It is important to know which one is more effective and reliable. To compare the diagnostic performance of DCE curves and DWI in discriminating benign and malignant NME lesions on the basis of morphologic characteristics assessment on contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI images. Retrospective. A total of 180 patients with 184 lesions in the training cohort and 75 patients with 77 lesions in the validation cohort with pathological results. A 3.0 T/multi-b-value DWI (b values = 0, 50, 1000, and 2000 sec/mm2 ) and time-resolved angiography with stochastic trajectories and volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (TWIST-VIBE) sequence. In the training cohort, a diagnostic model for morphology based on the distribution and internal enhancement characteristics was first constructed. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) model (ADC + morphology) and the time-intensity curves (TIC) model (TIC + morphology) were then established using binary logistic regression with pathological results as the reference standard. Both models were compared for sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) in the training and the validation cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and two-sample t-tests/Mann-Whitney U-test/Chi-square test were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the TIC/ADC model in the training cohort, sensitivities were 0.924/0.814, specificities were 0.615/0.615, and AUCs were 0.811 (95%, 0.727, 0.894)/0.769 (95%, 0.681, 0.856). The AUC of the TIC-ADC combined model was significantly higher than ADC model alone, while comparable with the TIC model (P = 0.494). In the validation cohort, the AUCs of TIC/ADC model were 0.799/0.635. Based on the morphologic analyses, the performance of the TIC model was found to be superior than the ADC model for differentiating between benign and malignant NME lesions. 4. Stage 2.

Li Y ，Chen J ，Yang Z ，Fan C ，Qin Y ，Tang C ，Yin T ，Ai T ，Xia L ... -  《-》