Major Postoperative Complications Limit Adjuvant Therapy Administration in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma or Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Guidelines for perioperative systemic therapy administration in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) are evolving. Decisions regarding adjuvant therapy are influenced by postoperative morbidity, which is common after pancreatoduodenectomy. We evaluated whether postoperative complications are associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC or dCCA from 2015 to 2020 was conducted. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and postoperative variables were analyzed. Overall, 186 patients were included-145 with PDAC and 41 with dCCA. Postoperative complication rates were similar for both pathologies (61% and 66% for PDAC and dCCA, respectively). Major postoperative complications (MPCs), defined as Clavien-Dindo >3, occurred in 15% and 24% of PDAC and dCCA patients, respectively. Patients with MPCs received lower rates of adjuvant therapy administration, irrespective of primary tumor (PDAC: 21 vs. 72%, p = 0.008; dCCA: 20 vs. 58%, p = 0.065). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was worse for patients with PDAC who experienced an MPC [8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 1-15) vs. 23 months (IQR 19-27), p < 0.001] or who did not receive any perioperative systemic therapy [11 months (IQR 7-15) vs. 23 months (IQR 18-29), p = 0.038]. In patients with dCCA, 1-year RFS was worse for patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (55 vs. 77%, p = 0.038). Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for either PDAC or dCCA and who experienced an MPC had lower rates of adjuvant therapy and worse RFS, suggesting that clinicians adopt a standard neoadjuvant systemic therapy strategy in patients with PDAC. Our results propose a paradigm shift towards preoperative systemic therapy in patients with dCCA.

Macfie R ，Berger Y ，Liu H ，Li T ，Imtiaz S ，Ang C ，Sarpel U ，Hiotis S ，Labow D ，Golas B ，Cohen NA ... -  《-》

Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.

This study aimed to compare surgical and oncological outcomes after minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). A dCCA might be a good indication for MIPD, as it is often diagnosed as primary resectable disease. However, multicenter series on MIPD for dCCA are lacking. This is an international multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study including patients after MIPD or OPD for dCCA in 8 centers from 5 countries (2010-2021). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFI). Secondary outcomes included perioperative and postoperative complications and predictors for OS or DFI. Subgroup analyses included robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD). Overall, 478 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for dCCA were included of which 97 after MIPD (37 RPD, 60 LPD) and 381 after OPD. MIPD was associated with less blood loss (300 vs 420 mL, P =0.025), longer operation time (453 vs 340 min; P <0.001), and less surgical site infections (7.8% vs 19.3%; P =0.042) compared with OPD. The median OS (30 vs 25 mo) and DFI (29 vs 18) for MIPD did not differ significantly between MIPD and OPD. Tumor stage (Hazard ratio: 2.939, P <0.001) and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (Hazard ratio: 0.640, P =0.033) were individual predictors for OS. RPD was associated with a higher lymph node yield (18.0 vs 13.5; P =0.008) and less major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo 3b-5; 8.1% vs 32.1%; P =0.005) compared with LPD. Both surgical and oncological outcomes of MIPD for dCCA are acceptable as compared with OPD. Surgical outcomes seem to favor RPD as compared with LPD but more data are needed. Randomized controlled trials should be performed to confirm these findings.

Uijterwijk BA ，Lemmers DHL ，Bolm L ，Luyer M ，Koh YX ，Mazzola M ，Webber L ，Kazemier G ，Bannone E ，Ramaekers M ，Ielpo B ，Wellner U ，Koek S ，Giani A ，Besselink MG ，Abu Hilal M ，ISGACA consortium, the International study group on non-pancreatic periampullary cancer ... -  《-》

Serious complications of pancreatoduodenectomy correlate with lower rates of adjuvant chemotherapy: Results from the recurrence after Whipple's (RAW) study.

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) can prolong overall survival (OS) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, fitness for AC may be influenced by postoperative recovery. We aimed to investigate if serious (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) postoperative complications affected AC rates, disease recurrence and OS. Data were extracted from the Recurrence After Whipple's (RAW) study (n = 1484), a retrospective study of PD outcomes (29 centres from eight countries). Patients who died within 90-days of PD were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare OS in those receiving or not receiving AC, and those with and without serious postoperative complications. The groups were then compared using univariable and multivariable tests. Patients who commenced AC (vs no AC) had improved OS (median difference: (MD): 201 days), as did those who completed their planned course of AC (MD: 291 days, p < 0.0001). Those who commenced AC were younger (mean difference: 2.7 years, p = 0.0002), more often (preoperative) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II (74% vs 63%, p = 0.004) and had less often experienced a serious postoperative complication (10% vs 18%, p = 0.002). Patients who developed a serious postoperative complication were less often ASA grade I-II (52% vs 73%, p = 0.0004) and less often commenced AC (58% vs 74%, p = 0.002). In our multicentre study of PD outcomes, PDAC patients who received AC had improved OS, and those who experienced a serious postoperative complication commenced AC less frequently. Selected high-risk patients may benefit from targeted preoperative optimisation and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Russell TB ，Labib PL ，Ausania F ，Pando E ，Roberts KJ ，Kausar A ，Mavroeidis VK ，Marangoni G ，Thomasset SC ，Frampton AE ，Lykoudis P ，Maglione M ，Alhaboob N ，Bari H ，Smith AM ，Spalding D ，Srinivasan P ，Davidson BR ，Bhogal RH ，Croagh D ，Dominguez I ，Thakkar R ，Gomez D ，Silva MA ，Lapolla P ，Mingoli A ，Porcu A ，Shah NS ，Hamady ZZR ，Al-Sarrieh B ，Serrablo A ，RAW study collaborators ，Lead unit ，Chief investigator ，Principle investigators ，Collaborators ，Collaborating units ，Principal investigator ，Collaborator ，Aroori S ... -  《-》

Prognostic impact of postoperative complication after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma stratified by the resectability status.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) stratified by resectability status. Medical records of 226 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent PD, including 115 with resectable (R) and 111 with borderline resectable/unresectable (BR/UR) PDAC, were reviewed retrospectively. Major complications were defined as grade III or IV based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The prognostic impact of major complications on overall survival (OS) was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses with stratification by resectability status. A multivariate analysis in the BR/UR group identified R1 resection (P = 0.03), T 3/4 stage (P = 0.03), and incidence of major complications (P = 0.03) as independent risk factors for poor survival, whereas major complications did not affect survival in the R group. Initiation of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy occurred significantly less frequently for patients with major complications than for those without major complications in the BR/UR group (P = 0.02). A negative prognostic impact of postoperative major complications after PD was observed in patients with BR/UR PDAC, whereas the prognostic impact was unclear in patients with R PDAC.

Kondo N ，Murakami Y ，Uemura K ，Nakagawa N ，Okada K ，Takahashi S ，Sueda T ... -  《-》

Long-term outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer: The influence of the histological subtypes and comparison with the other periampullary neoplasms.

Ampullary carcinoma (AC) is histologically classified as intestinal (In-AC), pancreaticobiliary (Pb-AC) or mixed-AC. The prognostic role of AC subtypes has been debated and remains unclear. The aims of this study were to evaluate outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for each subtype of AC and to compare these with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC] and distal cholangiocarcinoma [DCC]. PDs performed for AC between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Histological subtype was obtained for all patients. One-year, 3-year and 5-year disease-free-survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare Pb-AC, In-AC and mixed-AC. Comparison with PDs performed for PDAC and DCC during the same period was also performed. A total of 97 patients undergoing PD for AC were evaluated: 34 (35.1%) In-AC, 54 (55.7%) Pb-AC and 9 mixed-AC (9.3%). DFS and OS rates for Pb-AC were significantly lower compared to In-AC (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01), but similar to mixed-AC (p = 0.3 and p = 0.4). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with increased survival, regardless of the histological subtype (p > 0.05). During the same period, 337 and 53 PDs for PDAC and DCC, respectively, were performed. In-AC was associated with significantly better outcomes compared to PDAC and DCC (p < 0.001); DFS and OS rates for Pb-AC and mixed AC were significantly higher compared to PDAC (p < 0.001), but similar to DCC (p > 0.05). Pb-AC has significantly worse survival compared to In-AC. Moreover, mixed-AC should be considered as Pb-AC. Pb-AC and mixed-AC seem to have better prognosis compared to PDAC, but similar to DCC.

Nappo G ，Galvanin J ，Gentile D ，Capretti G ，Pulvirenti A ，Bozzarelli S ，Rimassa L ，Spaggiari P ，Carrara S ，Petitti T ，Gavazzi F ，Zerbi A ... -  《-》