Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).

Ageing poses a huge challenge to the Chinese social welfare system. However, a national long-term care (LTC) instrument has not been established yet. This study aimed to analyse and compare the content of six selected LTC instruments based on the linkage of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to provide a content reference from a functioning perspective for the development of a Chinese national LTC instrument. Two trained health professionals performed the linkage analysis according to the refined ICF linking rules. The main concepts included in the items of three international LTC instruments, namely Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0), Initial Assessment Instrument (IAI), and New Assessment Tool for Determining Dependency on Nursing Care (NBA), as well as three Chinese instruments, namely Disability Assessment of Long-Term Care (DA-LTC), Specification for Elderly Care Unified Need Assessment in Shanghai Version 2.0 (SEC-UNA 2.0), and pictorial-based Longshi Scale (LS), were selected and linked to the ICF categories. The six selected LTC instruments were analysed and compared at the levels of ICF components, chapters, and categories. The main concepts of 340 items of the six LTC instruments were linked to 112 different ICF categories. Within the ICF framework, the 'Activities and Participation' component was most frequently addressed in the LTC instruments, followed by 'Body functions', at 52% and 38%, respectively. At the chapter level, 'b1 mental functions', 'd4 mobility', and 'd5 self-care' were addressed by the majority of LTC instruments. The ICF provides a general reference for the analysis and comparison of different LTC instruments. The findings indicate that all LTC instruments focused on older adults' physical needs; however, various important issues regarding their psychological and social participation needs were not addressed. Specific for China, the core elements of LTC instruments varied, and the ICF chapters 'b1', 'd4', and 'd5' are recommended to develop a national uniform one.

Gao Y ，Zhao J ，Liu X ，Xie X ，Wang Y ... -  《BMC Geriatrics》

Patient-reported outcome measures for physical function in cancer patients: content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, FACT-G, and PROMIS measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Patient-reported physical function (PF) is a key endpoint in cancer clinical trials. Using complex statistical methods, common metrics have been developed to compare scores from different patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, but such methods do not account for possible differences in questionnaire content. Therefore, the aim of our study was a content comparison of frequently used PRO measures for PF in cancer patients. Relying on the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) we categorized the item content of the physical domains of the following measures: EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, PROMIS Cancer Item Bank for Physical Function, PROMIS Short Form for Physical Function 20a, and the FACT-G. Item content was linked to ICF categories by two independent reviewers. The 118 items investigated were assigned to 3 components ('d - Activities and Participation', 'b - Body Functions', and 'e - Environmental Factors') and 11 first-level ICF categories. All PF items of the EORTC measures but one were assigned to the first-level ICF categories 'd4 - Mobility' and 'd5 - Self-care', all within the component 'd - Activities and Participation'. The SF-36 additionally included item content related to 'd9 - Community, social and civic life' and the PROMIS Short Form for Physical Function 20a also included content related to 'd6 - domestic life'. The PROMIS Cancer Item Bank (v1.1) covered, in addition, two first-level categories within the component 'b - Body Functions'. The FACT-G Physical Well-being scale was found to be the most diverse scale with item content partly not covered by the ICF framework. Our results provide information about conceptual differences between common PRO measures for the assessment of PF in cancer patients. Our results complement quantitative information on psychometric characteristics of these measures and provide a better understanding of the possibilities of establishing common metrics.

Schurr T ，Loth F ，Lidington E ，Piccinin C ，Arraras JI ，Groenvold M ，Holzner B ，van Leeuwen M ，Petersen MA ，Schmidt H ，Young T ，Giesinger JM ，European Organisation for Research, Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group (EORTC QLG) ... -  《BMC Medical Research Methodology》

The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.

Prodinger B ，Stucki G ，Coenen M ，Tennant A ... -  《-》

Comparing the content of participation instruments using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.

Noonan VK ，Kopec JA ，Noreau L ，Singer J ，Chan A ，Mâsse LC ，Dvorak MF ... -  《Health and Quality of Life Outcomes》

Using the refined ICF Linking Rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: a systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation.

Ballert CS ，Hopfe M ，Kus S ，Mader L ，Prodinger B ... -  《-》