Comparison of the associations between Life's Essential 8 and Life's Simple 7 with depression, as well as the mediating role of oxidative stress factors and inflammation: NHANES 2005-2018.
Cardiovascular health (CVH) is closely associated with depression. However, Life's Essential 8 (LE8), a novel CVH measure, has not yet been clearly linked to depression. This study aims to explore the association between LE8 and depression, compare its advantages over Life's Simple 7 (LS7), and investigate the mediating effects of oxidative stress and inflammation.
This study investigated cross-sectional data of adults aged 20 and above from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005 to 2018. The LE8 score (ranging from 0 to 100) was derived from the American Heart Association's definition, based on the unweighted average of 8 metrics, classified as low cardiovascular health (CVH) (0-49), moderate CVH (50-79), and high CVH (80-100). Similar to LE8, LS7 scores were categorized into inadequate (0-7), average (8-10), or optimal (11-14) after calculating the unweighted mean of each component. Depression was diagnosed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with a score of ≥10 defining depression. Adjusted for sociodemographic factors and other risk factors for depression, weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analysis were used to explore the correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to study the associations between CVH scores and depression. Subsequently, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted, followed by an exploration of the mechanisms involved.
A total of 7 cycles from 2005 to 2018 contained complete data. Weighted logistic regression showed that both LS7 and LE8 were significantly associated with depression. Specifically, for LE8, after adjustment, the risk of depression decreased by 52 % for moderate CVH compared to low CVH (OR: 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.57, P < 0.0001), while the risk decreased by 80 % for high CVH (OR: 0.20, 95 % CI: 0.15-0.26, P < 0.0001, Ptrend < 0.0001). For LS7, after adjustment, compared with inadequate CVH, the risk of depression decreased by 49 % for average CVH (OR: 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.78, P = 0.002), and by 55 % for optimal CVH (OR: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.27-0.74, P = 0.002, Ptrend < 0.0001). Area under ROC curves for predicting depression were 0.672 (95 % CI, 0.66-0.684; P < 0.001) and 0.605 (95 % CI, 0.59-0.619; P < 0.001) for LE8 and LS7 (PDeLong < 0.001), respectively. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the association. GGT and WBC jointly mediated 9.62 % of this association (all P < 0.001).
The cross-sectional study cannot infer causality.
The association between Life's Essential 8 and depression was stronger and more practical. Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate this association. Individuals with extremely poor cardiovascular health have a 7-fold increased risk of depression, highlighting the necessity of maintaining at least moderate cardiovascular health.
Li L
，Dai F
《-》
Relation of Life's Essential 8 to the genetic predisposition for cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality: results from a national prospective cohort.
To evaluate the independent, mediating, interactive, and associated effects of Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and genetic predisposition on the risk of cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.
We retrieved a total of 254 783 individuals from the UK Biobank. LE8 was determined by eight metrics (nicotine exposure, physical activity, diet, sleep, body mass index, blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood lipids), and was characterized as low, moderate, and high cardiovascular health (CVH). Genetic predisposition was estimated using the polygenic risk score (PRS). Cox regressions were performed to evaluate the associations between LE8, PRS, and outcomes. During a median follow-up of 12.53 years, all-cause mortality occurred in 10 257 of 197 473 participants, cardiovascular mortality in 2074 of 215 675, and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in 71 774 of 215 675. Individuals with moderate or high CVH experienced a lower risk [hazard ratios (HRs) 0.33 to 0.81] of adverse health outcomes compared with their counterparts with low CVH. A substantial proportion (16.1∼69.8%) of health outcomes could be attributable to moderate or high LE8, and up to 51.2% of the associations between PRS and adverse outcomes were mediated by LE8. In high PRS group, individuals with high CVH had lower CVD mortality (HR: 0.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.18, 0.39), compared to those with low CVH.
Ideal CVH was associated with lower risks of cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality, with a more pronounced association observed in individuals with high PRS for CVD. Improving CVH according to LE8 guidelines should be encouraged, especially for those with PRS that indicate high CVD risk.
Zhang J
，Chen G
，Habudele Z
，Wang X
，Cai M
，Li H
，Gao Y
，Lip GYH
，Lin H
... -
《-》
Life's Essential 8 and carotid artery plaques: the Swedish cardiopulmonary bioimage study.
To quantify cardiovascular health (CVH), the American Heart Association (AHA) recently launched an updated construct of the "Life's Simple 7" (LS7) score, the "Life's Essential 8" (LE8) score. This study aims to analyse the association between both CVH scores and carotid artery plaques and to compare the predictive capacity of such scores for carotid plaques.
Randomly recruited participants aged 50-64 years from the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) were analysed. According to the AHA definitions, two CVH scores were calculated: i) the LE8 score (0, worst CVH; 100, best CVH) and two different versions of the LS7 score [(0-7) and (0-14), 0 indicating the worst CVH]. Ultrasound-diagnosed carotid plaques were classified as no plaque, unilateral, and bilateral plaques. Associations were studied by adjusted multinomial logistic regression models and adjusted (marginal) prevalences, while comparison between LE8 and LS7 scores was performed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
After exclusions, 28,870 participants remained for analysis (50.3% women). The odds for bilateral carotid plaques were almost five times higher in the lowest LE8 (<50 points) group [OR: 4.93, (95% CI: 4.19-5.79); adjusted prevalence 40.5%, (95% CI: 37.9-43.2)] compared to the highest LE8 (≥80 points) group [adjusted prevalence 17.2%, (95% CI: 16.2-18.1)]. Also, the odds for unilateral carotid plaques were more than two times higher in the lowest LE8 group [OR: 2.14, (95% CI: 1.82-2.51); adjusted prevalence 31.5%, (95% CI: 28.9-34.2)] compared to the highest LE8 group [adjusted prevalence 29.4%, (95% CI: 28.3-30.5)]. The areas under ROC curves were similar between LE8 and LS7 (0-14) scores: for bilateral carotid plaques, 0.622 (95% CI: 0.614-0.630) vs. 0.621 (95% CI: 0.613-0.628), P = 0.578, respectively; and for any carotid plaque, 0.602 (95% CI: 0.596-0.609) vs. 0.600 (95% CI: 0.593-0.607), P = 0.194, respectively.
The new LE8 score showed inverse and dose-response associations with carotid plaques, particularly bilateral plaques. The LE8 did not outperform the conventional LS7 score, which showed similar ability to predict carotid plaques, especially when scored as 0-14 points. We conclude that both the LE8 and LS7 may be useful in clinical practice for monitoring CVH status in the adult population.
Herraiz-Adillo Á
，Ahlqvist VH
，Higueras-Fresnillo S
，Berglind D
，Wennberg P
，Lenander C
，Daka B
，Ekstedt M
，Sundström J
，Ortega FB
，Östgren CJ
，Rådholm K
，Henriksson P
... -
《Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
