Peritransplantation Glucocorticoid Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Promising Strategy for AML Patients With High Leukemic Burden: Comparison With Transplantations Using Other Donor Types.

Using a murine haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (BMT) model, we recently showed that peritransplantation administration of glucocorticoid (GC) redistributed donor T cells from the gastrointestinal tract to bone marrow, which resulted in a significant reduction of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) while promoting graft-versus-leukemia effects. Furthermore, in a retrospective clinical study of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) undergoing transplantation in non-remission, we also showed that haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) using peritransplantation GC administration led to a significantly lower relapse rate and better overall survival rate compared with haplo-SCT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. In the present study, using the same dataset of patients undergoing GC haplo-SCT, we retrospectively compared with patients with AML undergoing transplantation in non-remission using 3 other donor types: matched sibling donor (MSD), matched unrelated donor (MUD), and umbilical cord blood (UCB). For GC haplo-SCT, 44 patients underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in a single center (Hyogo College of Medicine), with the conditioning treatment consisting of fludarabine, melphalan, anti-thymocyte globulin (2.5 mg/kg), and TBI 3 Gy. Methylprednisolone was given from the start of conditioning treatment, and the GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg). The transplantation outcomes were compared with data of 1889 patients undergoing MSD-SCT (n = 449), MUD-BMT (n = 493), or UCB transplantation (UCBT) (n = 947) in non-CR, which were extracted from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program data, the largest data registry in Japan. For donor engraftment, significantly faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment was achieved with GC haplo-SCT compared with allo-SCT using the 3 other donor types. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved at a median of 10 days for GC haplo-SCT, and 20 days for MSD-, MUD-, and UCB-transplants. Platelet engraftment was achieved at a median of 19.5 days for GC haplo-SCT, 42 days for MSD-SCT and MUD-BMT, and 43 days for UCBT, respectively. The incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was lower after allo-SCTs using MSD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.465, P = .003), MUD (HR = 0.524, P = .010), and UCB (HR = 0.647, P = .067) compared with GC haplo-SCT. There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic GVHD between GC haplo-SCT and allo-SCT using the other 3 donor types. Regarding relapse, GC haplo-SCT was associated with a significantly lower risk compared with MSD-SCT (P < .001) or MUD-BMT (P = .004). GC haplo-SCT tended to have a lower risk compared with UCBT (P = .063). Especially, all the 43 evaluable GC haplo-SCT recipients achieved CR after transplantation, whereas 23.9%, 22.8%, and 27.0% of patients who underwent MSD-SCT, MUD-BMT, and UCBT could not achieve CR after transplantation, respectively. Regarding non-relapse mortality, GC haplo-SCT was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with MUD-BMT (P = .014), and tended to have a higher risk compared with MSD-SCT (P = .061). There was no significant difference between GC haplo-SCT and UCBT (P = .600). Allo-SCTs using MSD (HR = 2.548, P < .001), MUD (HR = 2.134, P = .005), and UCB (HR = 2.376, P = .001) lead to significantly higher overall mortality compared with GC haplo-SCT; the adjusted overall survival at 3 years was 19.8% for MSD, 26.1% for MUD, 28.0% for UCB, and 65.1% for GC haplo. Thus GC haplo-SCT is a promising treatment option for patients with AML with a high leukemic burden.

Kaida K ，Ikegame K ，Inoue T ，Maruyama S ，Ishii S ，Uchida N ，Doki N ，Eto T ，Fukuda T ，Katayama Y ，Takada S ，Kawakita T ，Ichinohe T ，Atsuta Y ，Daimon T ，Ogawa H ... -  《-》

HLA-Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Nakaya Y ，Koh H ，Konuma T ，Shimomura Y ，Ishiyama K ，Itonaga H ，Hino M ，Doki N ，Nishida T ，Ohigashi H ，Matsuoka KI ，Kanda Y ，Maruyama Y ，Sawa M ，Eto T ，Hiramoto N ，Fukuda T ，Atsuta Y ，Nakamae H ... -  《-》

Unmanipulated haploidentical in comparison with matched unrelated donor stem cell transplantation in patients 60 years and older with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study on behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT.

Santoro N ，Labopin M ，Giannotti F ，Ehninger G ，Niederwieser D ，Brecht A ，Stelljes M ，Kröger N ，Einsele H ，Eder M ，Hallek M ，Glass B ，Finke J ，Ciceri F ，Mohty M ，Ruggeri A ，Nagler A ... -  《Journal of Hematology & Oncology》

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide after matched sibling, unrelated and haploidentical donor transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study of the ALWP EBMT.

Sanz J ，Galimard JE ，Labopin M ，Afanasyev B ，Angelucci E ，Ciceri F ，Blaise D ，Cornelissen JJ ，Meijer E ，Diez-Martin JL ，Koc Y ，Rovira M ，Castagna L ，Savani B ，Ruggeri A ，Nagler A ，Mohty M ，Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) ... -  《Journal of Hematology & Oncology》

Total Body Irradiation-Based Myeloablative Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Unrelated Donor Transplantation in Patients Without Matched Sibling Donors.

We enrolled 30 patients on a prospective phase II trial utilizing a total body irradiation (TBI)-based myeloablative preparative regimen (fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day × 3 days and TBI 150 cGy twice per day on day -4 to -1 [total dose 1200 cGy]) followed by infusion of unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells from a haploidentical family donor (haplo). Postgrafting immunosuppression consisted of cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day on days 3 and 4, mycophenolate mofetil through day 35, and tacrolimus through day 180. Median patient age was 46.5 years (range, 24 to 60). Transplantation diagnosis included acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 16), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 6), chronic myelogenous leukemia (n = 5), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 1), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 2). Using the Dana Farber/Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research/Disease Risk Index (DRI), patients were classified as low (n = 4), intermediate (n = 12), high (n = 11), and very high (n = 3) risk. All patients engrafted with a median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery of 16 and 25 days, respectively. All evaluable patients achieved sustained complete donor T cell and myeloid chimerism by day +30. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II to IV and III and IV was seen in 43% and 23%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 56% (severe in 10%). After a median follow-up of 24 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), nonrelapse mortality, and relapse rate were 78%, 73%, 3%, and 24%, respectively. Two-year DFS and relapse rate in patients with low/intermediate risk disease was 100% and 0%, respectively, compared with 39% and 53% for patients with high/very high risk disease. When compared with a contemporaneously treated cohort of patients at our institution receiving myeloablative HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation (acute myelogenous leukemia [n = 17], acute lymphoblastic leukemia [n = 15], chronic myelogenous leukemia [n = 7], myelodysplastic syndrome [n = 7], non-Hodgkin lymphoma [n = 1], chronic lymphoblastic leukemia [n = 1]), outcomes were statistically similar, with 2-yr OS and DFS being 78% and 73%, respectively after haplo transplantation versus 71% and 64%, respectively, after MUD transplantation. In patients with DRI low/intermediate risk disease, 2-yr DFS was superior after haplo compared with MUD transplantations (100% versus 74%, P = .032), whereas there was no difference in DFS in patients with high/very high risk disease (39% versus 37% for haplo and MUD respectively, P = .821). Grade II to IV acute GVHD was seen less often after haplo compared with MUD transplantation (43% versus 63%, P = .049), as was moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD (22% versus 58%, P = .003). Myeloablative haplo transplantation using this regimen is a valid option for patients with advanced hematologic malignancies who lack timely access to a conventional donor. Outcomes appear at least equivalent to those seen in contemporaneous patients who underwent transplantation from MUD.

Solomon SR ，Sizemore CA ，Sanacore M ，Zhang X ，Brown S ，Holland HK ，Morris LE ，Bashey A ... -  《-》