Bone-modifying agents for reducing bone loss in women with early and locally advanced breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.
Bisphosphonates and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-inhibitors are amongst the bone-modifying agents used as supportive treatment in women with breast cancer who do not have bone metastases. These agents aim to reduce bone loss and the risk of fractures. Bisphosphonates have demonstrated survival benefits, particularly in postmenopausal women.
To assess and compare the effects of different bone-modifying agents as supportive treatment to reduce bone mineral density loss and osteoporotic fractures in women with breast cancer without bone metastases and generate a ranking of treatment options using network meta-analyses (NMAs).
We identified studies by electronically searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase until January 2023. We searched various trial registries and screened abstracts of conference proceedings and reference lists of identified trials.
We included randomised controlled trials comparing different bisphosphonates and RANKL-inihibitors with each other or against no further treatment or placebo for women with breast cancer without bone metastases.
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Outcomes were bone mineral density, quality of life, overall fractures, overall survival and adverse events. We conducted NMAs and generated treatment rankings.
Forty-seven trials (35,163 participants) fulfilled our inclusion criteria; 34 trials (33,793 participants) could be considered in the NMA (8 different treatment options). Bone mineral density We estimated that the bone mineral density of participants with no treatment/placebo measured as total T-score was -1.34. Evidence from the NMA (9 trials; 1166 participants) suggests that treatment with ibandronate (T-score -0.77; MD 0.57, 95% CI -0.05 to 1.19) may slightly increase bone mineral density (low certainty) and treatment with zoledronic acid (T-score -0.45; MD 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.16) probably slightly increases bone mineral density compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Risedronate (T-score -1.08; MD 0.26, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.84) may result in little to no difference compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). We are uncertain whether alendronate (T-score 2.36; MD 3.70, 95% CI -2.01 to 9.41) increases bone mineral density compared to no treatment/placebo (very low certainty). Quality of life No quantitative analyses could be performed for quality of life, as only three studies reported this outcome. All three studies showed only minimal differences between the respective interventions examined. Overall fracture rate We estimated that 70 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo had fractures. Evidence from the NMA (16 trials; 19,492 participants) indicates that treatment with clodronate or ibandronate (42 of 1000; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.92; 40 of 1000; RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86, respectively) decreases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (high certainty). Denosumab or zoledronic acid (51 of 1000; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.01; 55 of 1000; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.11, respectively) probably slightly decreases the number of fractures; and risedronate (39 of 1000; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.16) probably decreases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Pamidronate (106 of 1000; RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.75 to 3.06) probably increases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Overall survival We estimated that 920 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo survived overall. Evidence from the NMA (17 trials; 30,991 participants) suggests that clodronate (924 of 1000; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.17), denosumab (927 of 1000; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.21), ibandronate (915 of 1000; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.34) and zoledronic acid (925 of 1000; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.14) may result in little to no difference regarding overall survival compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). Additionally, we are uncertain whether pamidronate (905 of 1000; HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.78) decreases overall survival compared to no treatment/placebo (very low certainty). Osteonecrosis of the jaw We estimated that 1 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. Evidence from the NMA (12 trials; 23,527 participants) suggests that denosumab (25 of 1000; RR 24.70, 95% CI 9.56 to 63.83), ibandronate (6 of 1000; RR 5.77, 95% CI 2.04 to 16.35) and zoledronic acid (9 of 1000; RR 9.41, 95% CI 3.54 to 24.99) probably increases the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Additionally, clodronate (3 of 1000; RR 2.65, 95% CI 0.83 to 8.50) may increase the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). Renal impairment We estimated that 14 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo developed renal impairment. Evidence from the NMA (12 trials; 22,469 participants) suggests that ibandronate (28 of 1000; RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.88) probably increases the occurrence of renal impairment compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Zoledronic acid (21 of 1000; RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.58) probably increases the occurrence of renal impairment while clodronate (12 of 1000; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.39) and denosumab (11 of 1000; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.19) probably results in little to no difference regarding the occurrence of renal impairment compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty).
When considering bone-modifying agents for managing bone loss in women with early or locally advanced breast cancer, one has to balance between efficacy and safety. Our findings suggest that bisphosphonates (excluding alendronate and pamidronate) or denosumab compared to no treatment or placebo likely results in increased bone mineral density and reduced fracture rates. Our survival analysis that included pre and postmenopausal women showed little to no difference regarding overall survival. These treatments may lead to more adverse events. Therefore, forming an overall judgement of the best ranked bone-modifying agent is challenging. More head-to-head comparisons, especially comparing denosumab with any bisphosphonate, are needed to address gaps and validate the findings of this review.
Adams A
，Jakob T
，Huth A
，Monsef I
，Ernst M
，Kopp M
，Caro-Valenzuela J
，Wöckel A
，Skoetz N
... -
《Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews》
Treatment of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline.
This guideline establishes clinical practice recommendations for treatment of restless legs syndrome (RLS) and periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD) in adults and pediatric patients.
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) commissioned a task force of experts in sleep medicine to develop recommendations and assign strengths based on a systematic review of the literature and an assessment of the evidence using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation methodology. The task force provided a summary of the relevant literature and the certainty of evidence, the balance of benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, and resource use considerations that support the recommendations. The AASM Board of Directors approved the final recommendations.
The following good practice statement is based on expert consensus, and its implementation is necessary for the appropriate and effective management of patients with RLS.
1. In all patients with clinically significant RLS, clinicians should regularly test serum iron studies including ferritin and transferrin saturation (calculated from iron and total iron binding capacity). Testing should ideally be administered in the morning avoiding all iron-containing supplements and foods at least 24 hours prior to blood draw. Analysis of iron studies greatly influences the decision to use oral or intravenous (IV) iron treatment. Consensus guidelines, which have not been empirically tested, suggest that supplementation of iron in adults with RLS should be instituted with oral or IV iron if serum ferritin ≤ 75 ng/mL or transferrin saturation < 20%, and only with IV iron if serum ferritin is between 75 and 100 ng/mL. In children, supplementation of iron should be instituted for serum ferritin < 50 ng/mL with oral or IV formulations. These iron supplementation guidelines are different than for the general population.
2. The first step in the management of RLS should be addressing exacerbating factors, such as alcohol, caffeine, antihistaminergic, serotonergic, antidopaminergic medications, and untreated obstructive sleep apnea.
3. RLS is common in pregnancy; prescribers should consider the pregnancy-specific safety profile of each treatment being considered.
The following recommendations are intended as a guide for clinicians in choosing a specific treatment for RLS and PLMD in adults and children. Each recommendation statement is assigned a strength ("strong" or "conditional"). A "strong" recommendation (ie, "We recommend…") is one that clinicians should follow under most circumstances. The recommendations listed below are ranked in the order of strength of recommendations and grouped by class of treatments within each PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) question. Some recommendations include remarks that provide additional context to guide clinicians with implementation of this recommendation.
1. In adults with RLS, the AASM recommends the use of gabapentin enacarbil over no gabapentin enacarbil (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
2. In adults with RLS, the AASM recommends the use of gabapentin over no gabapentin (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
3. In adults with RLS, the AASM recommends the use of pregabalin over no pregabalin (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
4. In adults with RLS, the AASM recommends the use of IV ferric carboxymaltose over no IV ferric carboxymaltose in patients with appropriate iron status (see good practice statement for iron parameters) (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
5. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests the use of IV low molecular weight iron dextran over no IV low molecular weight iron dextran in patients with appropriate iron status (see good practice statement for iron parameters) (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
6. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests the use of IV ferumoxytol over no IV ferumoxytol in patients with appropriate iron status (see good practice statement for iron parameters) (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
7. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests the use of ferrous sulfate over no ferrous sulfate in patients with appropriate iron status (see good practice statement for iron parameters) (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
8. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests the use of dipyridamole over no dipyridamole (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
9. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests the use of extended-release oxycodone and other opioids over no opioids (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
10. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests the use of bilateral high-frequency peroneal nerve stimulation over no peroneal nerve stimulation (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
11. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the standard use of levodopa (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
Remarks: levodopa may be used to treat RLS in patients who place a higher value on the reduction of restless legs symptoms with short-term use and a lower value on adverse effects with long-term use (particularly augmentation).
12. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the standard use of pramipexole (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
Remarks: pramipexole may be used to treat RLS in patients who place a higher value on the reduction of restless legs symptoms with short-term use and a lower value on adverse effects with long-term use (particularly augmentation).
13. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the standard use of transdermal rotigotine (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
Remarks: transdermal rotigotine may be used to treat RLS in patients who place a higher value on the reduction of restless legs symptoms with short-term use and a lower value on adverse effects with long-term use (particularly augmentation).
14. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the standard use of ropinirole (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
Remarks: ropinirole may be used to treat RLS in patients who place a higher value on the reduction of restless legs symptoms with short-term use and a lower value on adverse effects with long-term use (particularly augmentation).
15. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the use of bupropion for the treatment of RLS (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
16. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the use of carbamazepine (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
17. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the use of clonazepam (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
18. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the use of valerian (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
19. In adults with RLS, the AASM suggests against the use of valproic acid (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
20. In adults with RLS, the AASM recommends against the use of cabergoline (strong recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
21. In adults with RLS and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the AASM suggests the use of gabapentin over no gabapentin (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
22. In adults with RLS and ESRD, the AASM suggests the use of IV iron sucrose over no IV iron sucrose in patients with ferritin < 200 ng/mL and transferrin saturation < 20% (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence).
23. In adults with RLS and ESRD, the AASM suggests the use of vitamin C over no vitamin C (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
24. In adults with RLS and ESRD, the AASM suggests against the standard use of levodopa (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
Remarks: levodopa may be used to treat RLS in patients who place a higher value on the reduction of restless legs symptoms with short-term use and a lower value on adverse effects with long-term use (particularly augmentation).
25. In adults with RLS and ESRD, the AASM suggests against the standard use of rotigotine (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
Remarks: rotigotine may be used to treat RLS in patients who place a higher value on the reduction of restless legs symptoms with short-term use and a lower value on adverse effects with long-term use (particularly augmentation).
26. In adults with PLMD, the AASM suggests against the use of triazolam (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
27. In adults with PLMD, the AASM suggests against the use of valproic acid (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
28. In children with RLS, the AASM suggests the use of ferrous sulfate over no ferrous sulfate in patients with appropriate iron status (see good practice statement for iron parameters) (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence).
Winkelman JW, Berkowski JA, DelRosso LM, et al. Treatment of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(1):137-152.
Winkelman JW
，Berkowski JA
，DelRosso LM
，Koo BB
，Scharf MT
，Sharon D
，Zak RS
，Kazmi U
，Falck-Ytter Y
，Shelgikar AV
，Trotti LM
，Walters AS
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
