Impact of delayed veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning on postoperative rehabilitation of lung transplantation: a single-center comparative study.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a reliable and effective extracorporeal life support during lung transplantation (LTx). However, the clinical benefit of delayed VV-ECMO weaning remains unclear. The current study aims to investigate whether delayed weaning of VV-ECMO is more beneficial to the rehabilitation for lung transplant patients. Patients who underwent LTx with VV-ECMO between January 2017 and January 2019 were included. Enrollment of patients was suitable for weaning off ECMO immediately after surgery. Randomization was performed in the operating room. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Besides, univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to estimate risk of postoperative complications. Compared to VV-ECMO weaning immediately after LTx, delayed weaning was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (days, 31 vs. 46; P < 0.05), lower incidence of noninvasive ventilation (4.3% vs. 24.4%; P < 0.05), primary graft dysfunction (PGD) (6.4% vs. 29.3%; P < 0.05), atrial fibrillation (AF) (4.3% vs. 22%, P < 0.05), and respiratory failure (4.3% vs. 19.5%; P < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regressions revealed that VV-ECMO weaning after LTx was independently correlated with increased risk of developing PGD [odds ratio (OR), 5.97, 95% CI 1.16-30.74], AF (OR, 6.87, 95% CI 1.66-28.47) and respiratory failure (OR, 6.02, 95% CI 1.12-32.49) by comparison of delayed VV-ECMO weaning. Patients with delayed VV-ECMO weaning are associated with lower complications and short hospital length of stay, while it relates to longer mechanical ventilation. These findings suggest that delayed VV-ECMO after LTx can facilitate rehabilitation.

Li LJ ，Xu HY ，Wang XW ，Jin K ，Zhang C ，Du M ，Chen JY ，Wu QC ... -  《-》

[Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation].

Xia W ，Xu H ，Mao W ，Chen J ... -  《-》

A Retrospective Analysis for Risk Factors and Early Prognosis of Delayed Withdrawal Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation After Lung Transplantation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is widely used for cardiopulmonary assistance during lung transplantation (LTx). However, the optimal timing for ECMO removal remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors and early prognosis of delayed withdrawal ECMO after LTx. Two hundred sixty-seven patients who underwent LTx supported by ECMO were included in this study. Based on whether or not ECMO was completely stopped in the operating room, patients were divided into early ECMO withdrawal group (group E, 107 cases) and delayed withdrawal group (group D, 160 cases). Perioperative data of the donors and recipients, including the suspected risk factors for delayed removal of ECMO, postoperative complications, and hospital survival rate, were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative New York Heart Association cardiac function for recipients and mechanical ventilation time for donors were independent risk factors for delayed weaning of ECMO in veno-arterial ECMO patients. Compared with group E, the odds of postoperative pulmonary infection, primary graft dysfunction, renal dysfunction, blood transfusion volume, and mechanical ventilation time were significantly higher in group D (all P < 0.05). Delayed withdrawal ECMO was decisive factor for early postoperative death, as the risk of early postoperative death in group D was 1.99 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.54) times as that in the group E. During the period of LTx, New York Heart Association grade III/IV for recipients and mechanical ventilation time ≥5 days for donors are suggestive of delayed veno-arterial ECMO removal, and clinicians should minimize the postoperative bypass time of ECMO when conditions permit.

Minqiang L ，Xiaoshan L ，Bo X ，Guilong W ，Zhengfeng G ，Dong W ，Jingyu C ，Qiang W ，Chunxiao H ... -  《-》

The effect of tracheostomy on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcomes.

The optimal timing for pursuing tracheostomy in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation with either veno-arterial (VA) or veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a discussion of risk versus benefit. Depending on the etiology, cardiothoracic surgical patients carry some of the highest risk for respiratory failure postprocedure. Given that patients with end-stage cardiopulmonary status may be fraught with substantial comorbidities, it is critically important to manage the risk-benefit profile of performing a tracheostomy procedure on a patient requiring ECMO support. These cohorts have risk factors that may depend on each patient's inflammatory state, lung de-recruitment peri-procedure and postprocedure and bleeding requiring transfusions to name a few. We provide a descriptive analysis of ECMO patients on both VA and VV configurations who survived to hospital discharge receiving tracheostomy either during or after their ECMO course. A retrospective single-institutional study collected all consecutive patients age 18 and above who received any form of ECMO between 2016 and 2020. Five hundred forty-five patients were screened based on having received ECMO. Patients with mixed EMCO modality were excluded due to heterogeneity of disease process. A total of 521 patients received either VV or VA ECMO. A total of 54 patients received tracheostomy and had sufficiently clean data for analysis. Tracheostomy patients were compared based on survival to discharge, tracheostomy surgical complications, ECMO duration, ECMO configuration, inotrope and vasopressor use, transfusion rates, total ventilator days, total days on intravenous sedation, and history of cardiotomy or heart transplant were assessed. Baseline characteristics of race, age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were also collected. A total of 54 patients received tracheostomy. Twenty-nine of those patients received tracheostomy during the course of their ECMO, of whom 13 were on VV ECMO, 16 on VA ECMO. Another 25 patients underwent tracheostomy after successful ECMO explant; 8 of those were VV ECMO with the remaining 17 were on VA ECMO before explantation, with mean delay to tracheostomy, 10 and 19 days after explant between both modalities, respectively. A statistically significantly greater proportion of VV ECMO patients received a tracheostomy at any point versus VA ECMO patients (25.93% vs. 8.35%, p ≤ .0001). No statistically significant difference was noted in timing of tracheostomy when stratified by EMCO modality (VA 51.51% after explant vs. VV 38.10% after explant, p = .33). There was a greater frequency of minor tracheostomy complications in patients who were on ECMO at the time of their tracheostomy (p = .014) than in those who received their tracheostomy after being explanted. However, these minor complications did not contribute to a change in survival to hospital discharge (p = .58). Similarly, the small number of major complications (n = 13) did not impair survival to hospital discharge (p = .84). Finally, mean duration of ECMO was longer in those who received tracheostomy during ECMO versus after ECMO. (488.45 vs. 259.72 h, p < .01). Tracheostomy is known to increase patient mobility, clinical participation, and overall decrease in sedation use. Pursuing tracheostomy during ECMO is feasible, does not result in major bleeding, and is associated with only minor complications that overall do not decrease survival. While there is an increased duration of ECMO support in the tracheostomy cohort, this may be due to existing patient conditions, and may not be causal. Research is needed to further determine the external patient factors and specific timing to optimize both VV and VA ECMO courses. We hope that our analysis will pave the initial pathway for an evidence-based guideline on optimal timing of tracheostomy in ECMO patients, whether initiated during or after ECMO and taking into consideration ECMO configuration, its expected duration, and patient comorbidities.

Jones A ，Olverson G ，Hwang J ，Bhagat R ，McGann K ，Bradburn K ，Miller M ，Louis C ... -  《-》

[Concomitant use of peripheral veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) and central veno-arterial ECMO during lung transplantation for coronavirus disease 2019 patients].

Jiao G ，Jiang S ，Cheng J ，Hu C ，Huang D ，Wang G ... -  《-》