The Value of the 8th Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging on the Selection of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy for T1-2N1 Breast Cancer.

Patients diagnosed with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer between 2008 and 2018 in West China Hospital, Sichuan University were included. Locoregional-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) were defined as endpoints. The propensity score matching (PSM), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the Cox multivariable model were used for data analysis. We identified 1,615 patients with T1-2N1M0 breast cancer, and 44.9% (n = 744) of them were treated with PMRT. With a median follow-up of 76 months, 46 (2.8%) recurrences, 96 (5.9%) deaths, and 80 (5.0%) breast cancer-related deaths occurred. The 5-year LRFS, DMFS, DFS, BCSS, and OS were 98.6%, 95.3%, 93.7%, 96.5%, and 96.0%, respectively. PMRT could not improve 5-year LRFS, DMFS, DFS, BCSS, and OS compared with non-PMRT neither before nor after PSM in the era of contemporary systemic treatment. ROC curve showed that the 8th pathological prognostic staging had better discriminative ability compared with the 7th anatomical staging [the area under the curve (AUC) 0.653 vs. 0.546, P < 0.001]. In the anatomical staging system, PMRT had comparable 5-year BCSS in comparison with non-PMRT both in stages IIA (97.4% vs. 96.8%, P = 0.799) and IIB (95.3% vs. 97.0%, P = 0.071). When stratified according to the pathological staging, PMRT was associated with better 5-year BCSS in stage IIB (97.1% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.039), while not in stages IA, IB, IIA, and IIIA. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PMRT was a significantly protective factor for BCSS in stage IIB (HR 0.331, 95% CI: 0.100-0.967, P = 0.044). The new staging could better select high-risk patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer for radiotherapy compared with the 7th staging, and PMRT might be exempted except the 8th staging of IIB in the era of contemporary systemic therapy in this disease.

Wang J ，Zhong XR ，Luo T ，Xiang ZZ ，Zeng YY ，Yang T ，Zheng H ，Liu L ... -  《-》

The prognostic differences and the effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy between post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 breast cancer.

The prognosis and the value of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) between post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 breast cancer (BC) remain controversial. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic differences and the effect of PMRT between the two patient subsets. Patients diagnosed with pT1-2N1M0 BC were identified between 2010 and 2018. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for data analysis. Total number of 2103 pT1-2N1M0 BC patients were included in the study, including 270 post-chemotherapy (97 without PMRT, 173 with PMRT) and 1833 de novo cases (993 without PMRT, 840 with PMRT). No significant differences were found between post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 BC patients in 5-year OS (p = 0.068), BCSS (p = 0.054), LRFS (p = 0.241), DMFS (p = 0.104) or DFS (p = 0.08). PMRT did not improve any survival outcome in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy; however, the PMRT group had a better 5-year BCSS (97.0% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.033) in de novo pT1-2N1 BC. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that PMRT was a significant independent predictor of BCSS (HR 0.628; 95% CI, 0.403-0.978; p = 0.04) in de novo pT1-2N1 patients. There seemed no survival difference in post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 and de novo pT1-2N1 BC patients with contemporary systemic therapy. In addition, PMRT might be exempted in patients with post-chemotherapy ypT1-2ypN1 BC, while not in patients with de novo pT1-2N1 BC.

Yang T ，Zhong X ，Wang J ，Xiang Z ，Zeng Y ，Yu S ，Dai Z ，Xu N ，Luo T ，Liu L ... -  《Cancer Medicine》

Practical Model to Optimize the Strategy of Adjuvant Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in T1-2N1 Breast Cancer With Modern Systemic Therapy.

The effect of adjuvant irradiation after mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer patients remains controversial. The present study aims to explore the clinical benefit obtained from adjuvant radiotherapy among post-mastectomy pT1-2N1 breast cancer patients who received adjuvant modern systemic therapy. Medical records of consecutive patients with pT1-2N1 breast cancer who received mastectomy in our institution between January 2009 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. High-risk features consist of patient age, number of positive lymph nodes, T stage, and Ki67 index, which were developed previously at our institution using early-stage breast cancer patients after mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. Differences of survival and local recurrence were compared between no-postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and PMRT group according to number of risk factors. The time-to-event curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier methods and compared by the log-rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the imbalances in patient characteristics. A total of 548 patients were enrolled (no-PMRT: 259 and PMRT: 289). After a median follow-up of 69 months, the 5-year rate of DFS, BCSS, and LRR in the overall cohort was 90.2%, 97.4%, and 3.6%, respectively. PMRT did not significantly improve DFS, BCSS, and LRRFS in the whole cohort. Patients were divided into low-risk (with no or one risk factor) and high-risk (with two or more risk factors) groups. According to the univariable and multivariable analysis, high-risk group (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.11-2.98, p = 0.02) was demonstrated as an independent risk factor for DFS. For the high-risk group, PMRT significantly improved DFS from 81.4% to 91.9% and BCSS from 95.5% to 98.6% and decreased the 5-year rate of LRR from 5.6% to 1.4%, respectively (p < 0.01, p = 0.05, and p = 0.06). However, no survival benefit from PMRT was observed in the low-risk group in terms of DFS, BCSS, and LRR (p = 0.45, p = 0.51, and p = 0.99, respectively). In multivariate analysis, PMRT remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.00, p = 0.05) in the high-risk group. After PSM analysis, the survival benefit of PMRT was sustained in high-risk patients. PMRT significantly improved DFS in high-risk pT1-2N1 breast cancer patients, but not in low-risk patients. Independent validation of our scoring system is recommended.

Xu FF ，Cao L ，Xu C ，Cai G ，Wang SB ，Qi WX ，Chen JY ... -  《Frontiers in Oncology》

The Predictive Effect of the 8th AJCC Pathological Prognostic Staging on the Benefit of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in N2/N3 Breast Cancer.

The role of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathological prognostic staging (PPS) on treatment-decision making of breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the predictive effect of the 8th AJCC PPS on the benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in N2/N3 BC. We included women with stage N2/3 BC diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The effect of PMRT on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was evaluated using the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. A total of 13,445 patients were identified, including 10,547 (78.4%) patients treated with PMRT. All patients had reassigned stages based on the 8th AJCC PPS. There were 7102 patients (52.8%) that had stage changed, including 1160 patients (8.6%) were upstaged and 5942 patients (44.2%) were downstaged from the 7th AJCC anatomical staging (AS) to the 8th AJCC PPS. Regarding the 7th AJCC AS, 7603 (56.5%), 948 (7.1%), and 4895 (36.4%) were stage IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC diseases, respectively. Using the 8th AJCC PPS, 3525 (26.2%), 460 (3.4%), 1335 (9.9%), 3457 (25.7%), 2169 (19.1%), and 2100 (15.6%) patients were restaged as IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC diseases, respectively. The PPS displayed increased prognostic accuracy and improved model fit with respect to BCSS compared to the 7th AS (C-index, 0.731 vs 0.605, P < 0.001; Akaike Information Criterion, 42141 vs 43118). Regarding the AS, the receipt of PMRT was associated with a better BCSS in those with stage IIIA (P = 0.004), IIIB (P = 0.003), and IIIC (P < 0.001) diseases. Using the PPS, the receipt of PMRT was not associated with a better BCSS among patients with stage IB (P = 0.446), IIA (P = 0.140), and IIB (P = 0.248) disease, while the receipt of PMRT was associated with a better BCSS for those with stage IIIA (P = 0.009), IIIB (P < 0.001), and IIIC (P < 0.001) disease. The 8th AJCC staging provides superior risk stratification and a better tool to predict the benefit of PMRT in N2/3 BC.

Yang SP ，Zhou P ，Lian CL ，He ZY ，Wu SG ... -  《-》

Is postmastectomy radiotherapy necessary for breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

The significance of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients who initially have clinically node-positive (cN +) status but achieve downstaging to ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of PMRT in this patient subset. Patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2008 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed with the log-rank test. The impact of PMRT was further analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias. Of the 333 eligible patients, 189 (56.8%) received PMRT, and 144 (43.2%) did not. At a median follow-up period of 71 months, the five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 99.1%, 93.4%, 96.4%, and 94.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. Additionally, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 98.9%, 93.8%, 96.7%, and 94.5% with PMRT and 99.2%, 91.3%, 94.9%, and 92.0% without PMRT, respectively (all p-values not statistically significant). After multivariate analysis, PMRT was not a significant risk factor for any of the endpoints. When further stratified by stage, PMRT did not show any survival benefit for patients with stage II-III diseases. In the context of comprehensive treatments, PMRT might be exempted in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Further large-scale, randomized controlled studies are required to investigate the significance of PMRT in this patient subset.

Tan CF ，Wang J ，Zhong XR ，Dai ZL ，Xiang ZZ ，Zeng YY ，Wei XY ，Xu NY ，Liu L ... -  《-》