(18)F-Alfatide II PET/CT for Identification of Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Clinical Study.
18F-alfatide II has been proven to have excellent clinical translational potential. In this study, we investigated 18F-alfatide II for identifying breast cancer and compared the performances between 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG. Methods: Forty-four female patients with suspected primary breast cancer were recruited. PET/CT images using 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG were acquired within 7 d. Tracer uptake in breast lesions was evaluated by visual analysis, and semiquantitative analysis with SUVmax and SUVmeanResults: Forty-two breast cancer lesions and 11 benign breast lesions were confirmed by histopathology in 44 patients. Both 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG had higher uptake in breast cancer lesions than in benign breast lesions (P < 0.05 for 18F-alfatide II, P < 0.05 for 18F-FDG). The area under the curve of 18F-alfatide II was slightly less than that of 18F-FDG. Both 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG had high sensitivity (88.1% vs. 90.5%), high positive predictive value (88.1% vs. 88.4%), moderate specificity (54.5% vs. 54.5%), and moderate negative predictive value (54.5% vs. 60.0%) for differentiating breast cancer from benign breast lesions. By combining 18F-alfatide II and 18F-FDG, the sensitivity and negative predictive value significantly increased to 97.6% and 85.7%, respectively, with positive predictive value slightly increased to 89.1% and no change to the specificity (54.5%). The uptake of 18F-alfatide II (SUVmax: 3.77 ± 1.78) was significantly lower than that of 18F-FDG (SUVmax: 7.37 ± 4.48) in breast cancer lesions (P < 0.05). 18F-alfatide II uptake in triple-negative subtype was significantly lower than that in luminal A and luminal B subtypes. By contrast, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)-overexpressing subtype had higher 18F-FDG uptake than the other 3 subtypes. There were 8 breast cancer lesions with higher 18F-alfatide II uptake than 18F-FDG uptake, which all had a common characteristic that HER-2 expression was negative and estrogen receptor expression was strongly positive. Conclusion:18F-alfatide II is suitable for clinical use in breast cancer patients. 18F-alfatide II is of good performance, but not superior to 18F-FDG in identifying breast cancer. 18F-alfatide II may have superiority to 18F-FDG in detecting breast cancer with strongly positive estrogen receptor expression and negative HER-2 expression.
Wu J
，Wang S
，Zhang X
，Teng Z
，Wang J
，Yung BC
，Niu G
，Zhu H
，Lu G
，Chen X
... -
《-》
(18)F-Alfatide II for the evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients: comparison with (18)F-FDG.
18F-Alfatide II has been translated into clinical use and been proven to have good performance in identifying breast cancer. In this study, we investigated 18F-Alfatide II for evaluation of axillary lymph nodes (ALN) in breast cancer patients and compared the performance with 18F-FDG.
A total of 44 female patients with clinically suspected breast cancer were enrolled and underwent 18F-Alfatide II and 18F-FDG PET/CT within a week. Tracer uptakes in ALN were evaluated by visual analysis, semi-quantitative analysis with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), and SUVmax ratio of target/non-target (T/NT).
Among 44 patients, 37 patients were pathologically diagnosed with breast cancer with metastatic (17 cases) or non-metastatic (20 cases) ALN. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of visual analysis were 70.6%, 90%, 81.1%, 85.7%, and 78.3% for 18F-Alfatide II, 64.7%, 90%, 78.4%, 84.6%, and 75% for 18F-FDG, respectively. By combining 18F-Alfatide II and 18F-FDG, the sensitivity significantly increased to 82.4%, the specificity was 85%, the accuracy increased to 83.8%, the PPV was 82.4%, and the NPV significantly increased to 85.0%. Three cases of luminal B subtype were false negative for both 18F-Alfatide II and 18F-FDG. The other 2 false negative cases of 18F-Alfatide II were triple-negative subtype and 3 false negative cases of 18F-FDG were luminal B subtype too. The AUCs of three semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, T/NT) for 18F-Alfatide II were between 0.8 and 0.9, whereas those for 18F-FDG were more than 0.9. 18F-Alfatide II T/NT had the highest Youden index (76.5%), specificity (100%), accuracy (89.2%), and PPV (100%) among these semi-quantitative parameters. 18F-Alfatide II uptake as well as 18F-FDG uptake in metastatic axillary lymph nodes (MALN) was significantly higher than that in benign axillary lymph nodes (BALN). Both 18F-Alfatide II and 18F-FDG did not show difference in primary tumor uptake irrespective of ALN status.
18F-Alfatide II can be used in breast cancer patients to detect metastatic ALN, however, like 18F-FDG, with high specificity but relatively low sensitivity. The combination of 18F-Alfatide II and 18F-FDG can significantly improve sensitivity and NPV. 18F-Alfatide II T/NT may serve as the most important semi-quantitative parameter to evaluate ALN.
Wu J
，Tian J
，Zhang Y
，Ji H
，Sun J
，Wang X
，Sun C
，Wang L
，Teng Z
，Lu G
，Zhu H
，Chen X
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
