Combining FLASH and spatially fractionated radiation therapy: The best of both worlds.

FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) and spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) are two new therapeutical strategies that use non-standard dose delivery methods to reduce normal tissue toxicity and increase the therapeutic index. Although likely based on different mechanisms, both FLASH-RT and SFRT have shown to elicit radiobiological effects that significantly differ from those induced by conventional radiotherapy. With the therapeutic potential having been established separately for each technique, the combination of FLASH-RT and SFRT could therefore represent a winning alliance. In this review, we discuss the state of the art, advantages and current limitations, potential synergies, and where a combination of these two techniques could be implemented today or in the near future.

Schneider T ，Fernandez-Palomo C ，Bertho A ，Fazzari J ，Iturri L ，Martin OA ，Trappetti V ，Djonov V ，Prezado Y ... -  《-》

Radiation-induced immune response in novel radiotherapy approaches FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies.

The last several years have revealed increasing evidence of the immunomodulatory role of radiation therapy. Radiotherapy reshapes the tumoral microenvironment can shift the balance toward a more immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive microenvironment. The immune response to radiation therapy appears to depend on the irradiation configuration (dose, particle, fractionation) and delivery modes (dose rate, spatial distributions). Although an optimal irradiation configuration (dose, temporal fractionation, spatial dose distribution, etc.) has not yet been determined, temporal schemes employing high doses per fraction appear to favor radiation-induced immune response through immunogenic cell death. Through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and the sensing of double-stranded DNA and RNA breaks, immunogenic cell death activates the innate and adaptive immune response, leading to tumor infiltration by effector T cells and the abscopal effect. Novel radiotherapy approaches such as FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies (SFRT) strongly modulate the dose delivery method. FLASH-RT and SFRT have the potential to trigger the immune system effectively while preserving healthy surrounding tissues. This manuscript reviews the current state of knowledge on the immunomodulation effects of these two new radiotherapy techniques in the tumor, healthy immune cells and non-targeted regions, as well as their therapeutic potential in combination with immunotherapy.

Bertho A ，Iturri L ，Prezado Y 《International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology》

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps.

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.

Prezado Y ，Grams M ，Jouglar E ，Martínez-Rovira I ，Ortiz R ，Seco J ，Chang S ... -  《-》

Clinical aspects of spatially fractionated radiation therapy treatments.

To provide clinical guidance for centers wishing to implement photon spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) treatments using either a brass grid or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lattice approach. We describe in detail processes which have been developed over the course of a 3-year period during which our institution treated over 240 SFRT cases. The importance of patient selection, along with aspects of simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery are discussed. Illustrative examples involving clinical cases are shown, and we discuss safety implications relevant to the heterogeneous dose distributions. SFRT can be an effective modality for tumors which are otherwise challenging to manage with conventional radiation therapy techniques or for patients who have limited treatment options. However, SFRT has several aspects which differ drastically from conventional radiation therapy treatments. Therefore, the successful implementation of an SFRT treatment program requires the multidisciplinary expertise and collaboration of physicians, physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists. We have described methods for patient selection, simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance and delivery of clinical SFRT treatments which were built upon our experience treating a large patient population with both a brass grid and VMAT lattice approach. Preclinical research and patient trials aimed at understanding the mechanism of action are needed to elucidate which patients may benefit most from SFRT, and ultimately expand its use.

Grams MP ，Deufel CL ，Kavanaugh JA ，Corbin KS ，Ahmed SK ，Haddock MG ，Lester SC ，Ma DJ ，Petersen IA ，Finley RR ，Lang KG ，Spreiter SS ，Park SS ，Owen D ... -  《-》

A journey to understand SFRT.

This article tells the story of a medical physicist's journey to understand SFRT which started by accident more than 15 years ago. For decades, clinical application and preclinical research have shown that spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) can achieve a magically high therapeutic index. However, only recently, SFRT received well-deserved attention from mainstream radiation oncology. Today, our understanding of SFRT remains limited, which significantly hinders the advancement of SFRT for patient care. In this article, the author intends to shed some light on several important but unanswered SFRT research questions, including what is the essence of SFRT, which dosimetric parameters have clinical relevance and which do not, how does SFRT spare normal tissue but not tumor, and why radiobiological models developed for conventional radiation therapy may not be suitable for SFRT.

Chang S 《-》