Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials.

Phenomic prediction of wheat grain yield and heading date in different multi-environmental trial scenarios is accurate. Modelling the genotype-by-environment interaction effect using phenomic data is a potentially low-cost complement to genomic prediction. The performance of wheat cultivars in multi-environmental trials (MET) is difficult to predict because of the genotype-by-environment interactions (G × E). Phenomic selection is supposed to be efficient for modelling the G × E effect because it accounts for non-additive effects. Here, phenomic data are near-infrared (NIR) spectra obtained from plant material. While phenomic selection has recently been shown to accurately predict wheat grain yield in single environments, its accuracy needs to be investigated for MET. We used four datasets from two winter wheat breeding programs to test and compare the predictive abilities of phenomic and genomic models for grain yield and heading date in different MET scenarios. We also compared different methods to model the G × E using different covariance matrices based on spectra. On average, phenomic and genomic prediction abilities are similar in all different MET scenarios. Better predictive abilities were obtained when G × E effects were modelled with NIR spectra than without them, and it was better to use all the spectra of all genotypes in all environments for modelling the G × E. To facilitate the implementation of phenomic prediction, we tested MET designs where the NIR spectra were measured only on the genotype-environment combinations phenotyped for the target trait. Missing spectra were predicted with a weighted multivariate ridge regression. Intermediate predictive abilities for grain yield were obtained in a sparse testing scenario and for new genotypes, which shows that phenomic selection is an efficient and practicable prediction method for dealing with G × E.

Robert P ，Goudemand E ，Auzanneau J ，Oury FX ，Rolland B ，Heumez E ，Bouchet S ，Caillebotte A ，Mary-Huard T ，Le Gouis J ，Rincent R ... -  《-》

Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection.

Phenomic selection is a promising alternative or complement to genomic selection in wheat breeding. Models combining spectra from different environments maximise the predictive ability of grain yield and heading date of wheat breeding lines. Phenomic selection (PS) is a recent breeding approach similar to genomic selection (GS) except that genotyping is replaced by near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. PS can potentially account for non-additive effects and has the major advantage of being low cost and high throughput. Factors influencing GS predictive abilities have been intensively studied, but little is known about PS. We tested and compared the abilities of PS and GS to predict grain yield and heading date from several datasets of bread wheat lines corresponding to the first or second years of trial evaluation from two breeding companies and one research institute in France. We evaluated several factors affecting PS predictive abilities including the possibility of combining spectra collected in different environments. A simple H-BLUP model predicted both traits with prediction ability from 0.26 to 0.62 and with an efficient computation time. Our results showed that the environments in which lines are grown had a crucial impact on predictive ability based on the spectra acquired and was specific to the trait considered. Models combining NIR spectra from different environments were the best PS models and were at least as accurate as GS in most of the datasets. Furthermore, a GH-BLUP model combining genotyping and NIR spectra was the best model of all (prediction ability from 0.31 to 0.73). We demonstrated also that as for GS, the size and the composition of the training set have a crucial impact on predictive ability. PS could therefore replace or complement GS for efficient wheat breeding programs.

Robert P ，Auzanneau J ，Goudemand E ，Oury FX ，Rolland B ，Heumez E ，Bouchet S ，Le Gouis J ，Rincent R ... -  《-》

Feature engineering and parameter tuning: improving phenomic prediction ability in multi-environmental durum wheat breeding trials.

Optimized phenomic selection in durum wheat uses near-infrared spectra, feature engineering and parameter tuning. Our study reports improvements in predictive ability and emphasizes customized preprocessing for different traits and models. The success of plant breeding programs depends on efficient selection decisions. Phenomic selection has been proposed as a tool to predict phenotype performance based on near-infrared spectra (NIRS) to support selection decisions. In this study, we test the performance of phenomic selection in multi-environmental trials from our durum wheat breeding program for three breeding scenarios and use feature engineering as well as parameter tuning to improve the phenomic prediction ability. In addition, we investigate the influence of genotype and environment on the phenomic prediction ability for agronomic and quality traits. Preprocessing, based on a grid search over the Savitzky-Golay filter parameters based on 756,000 genotype best linear unbiased estimate (BLUE) computations, improved the phenomic prediction ability by up to 1500% (0.02-0.3). Furthermore, we show that preprocessing should be optimized depending on the dataset, trait, and model used for prediction. The phenomic prediction scenarios in our durum breeding program resulted in low-to-moderate prediction abilities with the highest and most stable prediction results when predicting new genotypes in the same environment as used for model training. This is consistent with the finding that NIRS capture both the genotype and genotype-by-environment ( G × E ) interaction variance.

Meyenberg C ，Braun V ，Longin CFH ，Thorwarth P ... -  《-》

Predictor bias in genomic and phenomic selection.

NIRS of wheat grains as phenomic predictors for grain yield show inflated prediction ability and are biased toward grain protein content. Estimating the breeding value of individuals using genome-wide marker data (genomic prediction) is currently one of the most important drivers of breeding progress in major crops. Recently, phenomic technologies, including remote sensing and aerial hyperspectral imaging of plant canopies, have made it feasible to predict the breeding value of individuals in the absence of genetic marker data. This is commonly referred to as phenomic prediction. Hyperspectral measurements in the form of near-infrared spectroscopy have been used since the 1980 s to predict compositional parameters of harvest products. Moreover, in recent studies NIRS from grains was used to predict grain yield. The same studies showed that phenomic prediction can outperform genomic prediction for grain yield. The genome is static and not environment dependent, thereby limiting genomic prediction ability. Gene expression is tissue specific and differs under environmental influences, leading to a tissue- and environment-specific phenome, potentially explaining the higher predictive ability of phenomic prediction. Here, we compare genomic prediction and phenomic prediction from hyperspectral measurements of wheat grains for the prediction of a variety of traits including grain yield. We show that phenomic predictions outperform genomic prediction for some traits. However, phenomic predictions are biased toward the information present in the predictor. Future studies on this topic should investigate whether population parameters are retained in phenomic prediction as they are in genomic prediction. Furthermore, we find that unbiased phenomic prediction abilities are considerably lower than previously reported and recommend a method to circumvent this issue.

Dallinger HG ，Löschenberger F ，Bistrich H ，Ametz C ，Hetzendorfer H ，Morales L ，Michel S ，Buerstmayr H ... -  《-》

Hyperspectral Reflectance-Derived Relationship Matrices for Genomic Prediction of Grain Yield in Wheat.

Hyperspectral reflectance phenotyping and genomic selection are two emerging technologies that have the potential to increase plant breeding efficiency by improving prediction accuracy for grain yield. Hyperspectral cameras quantify canopy reflectance across a wide range of wavelengths that are associated with numerous biophysical and biochemical processes in plants. Genomic selection models utilize genome-wide marker or pedigree information to predict the genetic values of breeding lines. In this study, we propose a multi-kernel GBLUP approach to genomic selection that uses genomic marker-, pedigree-, and hyperspectral reflectance-derived relationship matrices to model the genetic main effects and genotype × environment (G × E) interactions across environments within a bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding program. We utilized an airplane equipped with a hyperspectral camera to phenotype five differentially managed treatments of the yield trials conducted by the Bread Wheat Improvement Program of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) at Ciudad Obregón, México over four breeding cycles. We observed that single-kernel models using hyperspectral reflectance-derived relationship matrices performed similarly or superior to marker- and pedigree-based genomic selection models when predicting within and across environments. Multi-kernel models combining marker/pedigree information with hyperspectral reflectance phentoypes had the highest prediction accuracies; however, improvements in accuracy over marker- and pedigree-based models were marginal when correcting for days to heading. Our results demonstrate the potential of using hyperspectral imaging to predict grain yield within a multi-environment context and also support further studies on the integration of hyperspectral reflectance phenotyping into breeding programs.

Krause MR ，González-Pérez L ，Crossa J ，Pérez-Rodríguez P ，Montesinos-López O ，Singh RP ，Dreisigacker S ，Poland J ，Rutkoski J ，Sorrells M ，Gore MA ，Mondal S ... -  《G3-Genes Genomes Genetics》