Self-Organization of Interprofessional Staff to Improve Mobility of Hospitalized Patients with STRIDE: a Complexity Science-Informed Qualitative Study.

Inpatient mobility programs can help older adults maintain function during hospitalization. Changing hospital practice can be complex and require engagement of various staff levels and disciplines; however, we know little about how interprofessional teams organize around implementing such interventions. Complexity science can inform approaches to understanding and improving multidisciplinary collaboration to implement clinical programs. To examine, through a complexity science lens, how clinical staff's understanding about roles in promoting inpatient mobility evolved during implementation of the STRIDE (assiSTed eaRly mobIlity for hospitalizeD older vEterans) hospital mobility program. Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Ninety-two clinical staff at eight Veterans Affairs hospitals. STRIDE is a supervised walking program for hospitalized older adults designed to maintain patients' mobility and function. We interviewed key staff involved in inpatient mobility efforts at each STRIDE site in pre- and post-implementation periods. Interviews elicited staff's perception of complexity-science aspects of inpatient mobility teams (e.g., roles over time, team composition). We analyzed data using complexity science-informed qualitative content analysis. We identified three key themes related to patterns of self-organization: (1) individuals outside of the "core" STRIDE team voluntarily assumed roles as STRIDE advocates, (2) leader-champions adapted their engagement level to match local implementation team needs during implementation, and (3) continued leadership support and physical therapy involvement were key factors for sustainment. Staff self-organized around implementation of a new clinical program in ways that were responsive to changing program and contextual needs. These findings demonstrate the importance of effective self-organization for clinical program implementation. Researchers and practitioners implementing clinical programs should allow for, and encourage, flexibility in staff roles in planning for implementation of a new clinical program, encourage the development of advocates, and engage leaders in program planning and sustainment efforts.

Bruening RA ，Sperber N ，Wang V ，Mahanna E ，Choate A ，Tucker M ，Zullig LL ，Van Houtven CH ，Allen KD ，Hastings SN ... -  《-》

Supporting teams to optimize function and independence in Veterans: a multi-study program and mixed methods protocol.

Wang V ，Allen K ，Van Houtven CH ，Coffman C ，Sperber N ，Mahanna EP ，Colón-Emeric C ，Hoenig H ，Jackson GL ，Damush TM ，Price E ，Hastings SN ... -  《Implementation Science》

Enhancing team communication to improve implementation of a supervised walking program for hospitalized veterans: Evidence from a multi-site trial in the Veterans Health Administration.

The timely translation of evidence-based programs into real-world clinical settings is a persistent challenge due to complexities related to organizational context and team function, particularly in inpatient settings. Strategies are needed to promote quality improvement efforts and implementation of new clinical programs. This study examines the role of CONNECT, a complexity science-based implementation intervention to promote team readiness, for enhancing implementation of the 'Assisted Early Mobility for Hospitalized Older Veterans' program (STRIDE), an inpatient, supervised walking program. We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial using a convergent mixed-methods design. Within each randomly assigned stepped-wedge sequence, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) were randomized to receive standardized implementation support only or additional training via the CONNECT intervention. Data for the study were obtained from hospital administrative and electronic health records, surveys, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians before and after implementation of STRIDE. Eight U.S. VAMCs. Three hundred fifty-three survey participants before STRIDE implementation and 294 surveys after STRIDE implementation. Ninety-two interview participants. CONNECT, a complexity-science-based intervention to improve team function. The implementation outcomes included STRIDE reach and fidelity. Secondary outcomes included validated measures of team function (i.e., team communication, coordination, role clarity). At four VAMCs randomized to CONNECT, reach was higher (mean 12.4% vs. 3.8%), and fidelity was similar to four non-CONNECT VAMCs. VAMC STRIDE delivery teams receiving CONNECT reported improvements in team function domains, similar to non-CONNECT VAMCs. Qualitative findings highlight CONNECT's impact and the influence of team characteristics and contextual factors, including team cohesion, leadership support, and role clarity, on reach and fidelity. CONNECT may promote greater reach of STRIDE, but improvement in team function among CONNECT VAMCs was similar to improvement among non-CONNECT VAMCs. Qualitative findings suggest that CONNECT may improve team function and implementation outcomes but may not be sufficient to overcome structural barriers related to implementation capacity.

Drake C ，Wang V ，Stechuchak KM ，Sperber N ，Bruening R ，Coffman CJ ，Choate A ，Van Houtven CH ，Allen KD ，Colon-Emeric C ，Jackson GL ，Tucker M ，Meyer C ，Kappler CB ，Hastings SN ... -  《-》

Implementing a Mandated Program Across a Regional Health Care System: A Rapid Qualitative Assessment to Evaluate Early Implementation Strategies.

Sperber NR ，Bruening RA ，Choate A ，Mahanna E ，Wang V ，Powell BJ ，Damush T ，Jackson GL ，Van Houtven CH ，Allen KD ，Hastings SN ... -  《-》

Organizational Characteristics of Hospitals Meeting STRIDE Program Adoption Benchmarks to Support Mobility for Hospitalized Persons.

Zullig LL ，Drake C ，Webster A ，Tucker M ，Choate A ，Stechuchak KM ，Coffman CJ ，Kappler CB ，Meyer C ，Van Houtven CH ，Allen KD ，Hughes JM ，Sperber N ，Hastings SN ... -  《-》