Cetuximab and vemurafenib plus FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan) for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer (IMPROVEMENT): An open-label, single-arm, phase II trial.

Current therapeutic regimens for patients with v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E-mutated colorectal cancer show unsatisfactory efficacy. To improve outcomes in this area, we assessed the safety and efficacy of a new protocol using vemurafenib and cetuximab combined with FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan) in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer. This was an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial conducted in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer. Patients were eligible to receive FOLFIRI combined with vemurafenib and cetuximab. The primary end-point was the objective response rate, and the secondary end-points included disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03727763. Between 12th January 2018, and 18th June 2021, we screened 27 patients, 21 of which were enrolled in this study. Efficacy analysis showed that objective response rates were 81.0% (17/21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 57.4-93.7) in the intention-to-treat population and 85.0% (17/20, 95%CI 61.0-96.0) in the per-protocol population; two patients achieved complete response, and 15 patients achieved a partial response. In the entire cohort, the median progression-free survival was 9.7 months (95%CI 6.3-10.9), and the median overall survival for all patients was 15.4 months (95%CI 8.5-15.4). The most common adverse events (grade 3 to 4) were neutropenia (8/21), anaemia (3/21) and skin rash (3/21). Vemurafenib and cetuximab can be safely combined with the FOLFIRI regimen, showing promising antitumour activity and tolerable toxicity in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer. This regimen warrants a further randomised study in phase III clinical trials.

Wang Z ，Qin BD ，Ye CY ，Wang MM ，Yuan LY ，Dai WP ，Sun L ，Liu K ，Qin WX ，Jiao XD ，Li XN ，Zang YS ... -  《-》

First-line systemic treatment strategies in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CAIRO5): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study from the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.

Patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases might qualify for local treatment with curative intent after reducing the tumour size by induction systemic treatment. We aimed to compare the currently most active induction regimens. In this open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 study (CAIRO5), patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed colorectal cancer, known RAS/BRAFV600E mutation status, WHO performance status of 0-1, and initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases were enrolled at 46 Dutch and one Belgian secondary and tertiary centres. Resectability or unresectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases was assessed centrally by an expert panel of liver surgeons and radiologists, at baseline and every 2 months thereafter by predefined criteria. Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation technique via a masked web-based allocation procedure. Patients with right-sided primary tumour site or RAS or BRAFV600E mutated tumours were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (group A) or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (group B). Patients with left-sided and RAS and BRAFV600E wild-type tumours were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (group C) or FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus panitumumab (group D), every 14 days for up to 12 cycles. Patients were stratified by resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases, serum lactate dehydrogenase concentration, choice of irinotecan versus oxaliplatin, and BRAFV600E mutation status (for groups A and B). Bevacizumab was administered intravenously at 5 mg/kg. Panitumumab was administered intravenously at 6 mg/kg. FOLFIRI consisted of intravenous infusion of irinotecan at 180 mg/m2 with folinic acid at 400 mg/m2, followed by bolus fluorouracil at 400 mg/m2 intravenously, followed by continuous infusion of fluorouracil at 2400 mg/m2. FOLFOX consisted of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 intravenously together with the same schedule of folinic acid and fluorouracil as in FOLFIRI. FOLFOXIRI consisted of irinotecan at 165 mg/m2 intravenously, followed by intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 with folinic acid at 400 mg/m2, followed by continuous infusion of fluorouracil at 3200 mg/m2. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, analysed on a modified intention-to-treat basis, excluding patients who withdrew consent before starting study treatment or violated major entry criteria (no metastatic colorectal cancer, or previous liver surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02162563, and accrual is complete. Between Nov 13, 2014, and Jan 31, 2022, 530 patients (327 [62%] male and 203 [38%] female; median age 62 years [IQR 54-69]) were randomly assigned: 148 (28%) patients to group A, 146 (28%) patients to group B, 118 (22%) patients to group C, and 118 (22%) patients to group D. Groups C and D were prematurely closed for futility. 521 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (147 in group A, 144 in group B, 114 in group C, and 116 in group D). The median follow-up at the time of this analysis was 51·1 months (95% CI 47·7-53·1) in groups A and B and 49·9 months (44·5-52·5) in in groups C and D. Median progression-free survival was 9·0 months (95% CI 7·7-10·5) in group A versus 10·6 months (9·9-12·1) in group B (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·76 [95% CI 0·60-0·98]; p=0·032), and 10·8 months (95% CI 9·9-12·6) in group C versus 10·4 months (9·8-13·0) in group D (stratified HR 1·11 [95% CI 0·84-1·48]; p=0·46). The most frequent grade 3-4 events in groups A and B were neutropenia (19 [13%] patients in group A vs 57 [40%] in group B; p<0·0001), hypertension (21 [14%] vs 20 [14%]; p=1·00), and diarrhoea (five [3%] vs 28 [19%]; p<0·0001), and in groups C and D were neutropenia (29 [25%] vs 24 [21%]; p=0·44), skin toxicity (one [1%] vs 29 [25%]; p<0·0001), hypertension (20 [18%] vs eight [7%]; p=0·016), and diarrhoea (five [4%] vs 18 [16%]; p=0·0072). Serious adverse events occurred in 46 (31%) patients in group A, 75 (52%) patients in group B, 41 (36%) patients in group C, and 49 (42%) patients in group D. Seven treatment-related deaths were reported in group B (two due to multiorgan failure, and one each due to sepsis, pneumonia, portal vein thrombosis, septic shock and liver failure, and sudden death), one in group C (multiorgan failure), and three in group D (cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, and abdominal sepsis). In patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases, FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab was the preferred treatment in patients with a right-sided or RAS or BRAFV600E mutated primary tumour. In patients with a left-sided and RAS and BRAFV600E wild-type tumour, the addition of panitumumab to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI showed no clinical benefit over bevacizumab, but was associated with more toxicity. Roche and Amgen.

Bond MJG ，Bolhuis K ，Loosveld OJL ，de Groot JWB ，Droogendijk H ，Helgason HH ，Hendriks MP ，Klaase JM ，Kazemier G ，Liem MSL ，Rijken AM ，Verhoef C ，de Wilt JHW ，de Jong KP ，Gerhards MF ，van Amerongen MJ ，Engelbrecht MRW ，van Lienden KP ，Molenaar IQ ，de Valk B ，Haberkorn BCM ，Kerver ED ，Erdkamp F ，van Alphen RJ ，Mathijssen-van Stein D ，Komurcu A ，Lopez-Yurda M ，Swijnenburg RJ ，Punt CJA ，Dutch Colorectal Cancer Study Group ... -  《-》

Phase IB Study of Vemurafenib in Combination with Irinotecan and Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with BRAFV600E Mutation.

In vitro, EGFR inhibition, combined with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, causes synergistic cytotoxicity for BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer, further augmented by irinotecan. The safety and efficacy of vemurafenib, irinotecan, and cetuximab in BRAF-mutated malignancies are not defined. In this 3+3 phase I study, patients with BRAFV600E-advanced solid cancers received cetuximab and irinotecan with escalating doses of vemurafenib. Nineteen patients (18 with metastatic colorectal cancer and 1 with appendiceal cancer) were enrolled. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The MTD of vemurafenib was 960 mg twice daily. Six of 17 evaluable patients (35%) achieved a radiographic response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, consistent with in vivo models demonstrating tumor regressions with the triplet regimen. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months. BRAFV600E circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) trends correlated with radiographic changes, and acquired mutations from cfDNA in genes reactivating MAPK signaling were observed at progression. Vemurafenib, in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab, was well tolerated in patients with refractory, BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, and both survival outcomes and response rates exceeded prior reports for vemurafenib and for irinotecan plus cetuximab in BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer. In vivo models demonstrated regressions with the triplet, in contrast with vemurafenib and cetuximab alone. cfDNA predicted radiographic response and identified mutations reactivating the MAPK pathway upon progression. Cancer Discov; 6(12); 1352-65. ©2016 AACR.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1293.

Hong DS ，Morris VK ，El Osta B ，Sorokin AV ，Janku F ，Fu S ，Overman MJ ，Piha-Paul S ，Subbiah V ，Kee B ，Tsimberidou AM ，Fogelman D ，Bellido J ，Shureiqi I ，Huang H ，Atkins J ，Tarcic G ，Sommer N ，Lanman R ，Meric-Bernstam F ，Kopetz S ... -  《-》

Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E-Mutated Colorectal Cancer.

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of 4 to 6 months after failure of initial therapy. Inhibition of BRAF alone has limited activity because of pathway reactivation through epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled 665 patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer who had had disease progression after one or two previous regimens. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab (triplet-therapy group); encorafenib and cetuximab (doublet-therapy group); or the investigators' choice of either cetuximab and irinotecan or cetuximab and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) (control group). The primary end points were overall survival and objective response rate in the triplet-therapy group as compared with the control group. A secondary end point was overall survival in the doublet-therapy group as compared with the control group. We report here the results of a prespecified interim analysis. The median overall survival was 9.0 months in the triplet-therapy group and 5.4 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.70; P<0.001). The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% CI, 18 to 35) in the triplet-therapy group and 2% (95% CI, 0 to 7) in the control group (P<0.001). The median overall survival in the doublet-therapy group was 8.4 months (hazard ratio for death vs. control, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 58% of patients in the triplet-therapy group, in 50% in the doublet-therapy group, and in 61% in the control group. A combination of encorafenib, cetuximab, and binimetinib resulted in significantly longer overall survival and a higher response rate than standard therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF V600E mutation. (Funded by Array BioPharma and others; BEACON CRC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02928224; EudraCT number, 2015-005805-35.).

Kopetz S ，Grothey A ，Yaeger R ，Van Cutsem E ，Desai J ，Yoshino T ，Wasan H ，Ciardiello F ，Loupakis F ，Hong YS ，Steeghs N ，Guren TK ，Arkenau HT ，Garcia-Alfonso P ，Pfeiffer P ，Orlov S ，Lonardi S ，Elez E ，Kim TW ，Schellens JHM ，Guo C ，Krishnan A ，Dekervel J ，Morris V ，Calvo Ferrandiz A ，Tarpgaard LS ，Braun M ，Gollerkeri A ，Keir C ，Maharry K ，Pickard M ，Christy-Bittel J ，Anderson L ，Sandor V ，Tabernero J ... -  《-》

Cetuximab Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Unresectable Wild-Type RAS and BRAF Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Institute Prospective Study.

Jiang T ，Chen H ，Zheng J ，Du B ，Yang B ，Liu Q ，Zhong D ，Wang X ，Wang H ，Lin M ，Lai J ，Hou P ，Lin X ... -  《-》