Survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with residual pathologic disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Although preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) or chemoradiation is the current standard of care for esophageal cancer in China, the impact of subsequent adjuvant therapy on patient prognosis remains unknown. This study aims to analyze the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on the survival rates of patients who have achieved a non-pathological complete response (non-pCR) after NACT and subsequent surgery.
We reviewed the data of 2193 patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent radical surgery between January 2006 and January 2016. Of these patients, 46 received NACT and ACT, while 109 received NACT only. Propensity score matching was used to compare 86 patients, with 43 patients in the NACT + ACT group and 43 patients in the NACT group. Univariate analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was used for multivariate analysis.
Multivariate analysis revealed that pathological lymph node status (positive vs negative) (P < .001) and treatment modalities (NACT + ACT vs NACT) (P = .005) were independent prognostic factors. There was a significant difference in long-term survival rates between the NACT + ACT and NACT groups, with 5-year survival rates of 55.8% vs 39.5%, respectively (χ2 = 4.270, P = .039). In patients with ypN+ status, the 5-year survival rate was 31.8% for those who received ACT after NACT and surgery, compared to 10.0% for those who did not receive additional ACT (χ2 = 6.101, P = .014). The corresponding percentages in patients with ypN- were 81.0% and 65.2%, respectively (χ2 = 1.993, P = .158).
Adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended for locally advanced ESCC patients with residual cancer after NACT and surgery, especially for patients with nodal metastases after NACT.
Lu H
，Liu JF
，Rong Y
，Liu XB
，Wang Y
... -
《-》
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery with or without chemotherapy for patients with clinical stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and chemoradiotherapy have been shown to extend postoperative survival, and preoperative therapy followed by esophagectomy has become the standard treatment worldwide for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9907 study showed that NAC significantly extended survival in advanced ESCC, but the survival benefit for patients with clinical stage III disease remains to be elucidated. We compared the survival rates of NAC and upfront surgery in patients with clinical stage III ESCC. Consecutive patients histologically diagnosed as clinical stage III (excluding cT4) ESCC were eligible for this retrospective study. Between September 2002 and April 2007, upfront transthoracic esophagectomy was performed initially and, for patients with positive lymph node (LN) metastasis in a resected specimen, adjuvant chemotherapy using cisplatin and 5-fluororouracil every 3 weeks for two cycles was administered (Upfront surgery group). Since May 2007, a NAC regimen used as adjuvant chemotherapy followed by transthoracic esophagectomy has been administered as the standard treatment in our institution (NAC group). Patient characteristics, clinicopathological factors, treatment outcomes, post-treatment recurrence, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the NAC and upfront surgery groups. Fifty-one and 55 patients were included in the NAC and upfront surgery groups, respectively. The R0 resection rate was significantly lower in the NAC group than in the upfront surgery group (upfront surgery, 98%; NAC, 76%; P = 0.003). In the upfront surgery group, of 49 patients who underwent R0 resection and pathologically positive for LN metastasis, 22 (45%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the NAC group, 49 (96%) of 51 patients completed two cycles of NAC. In survival analysis, no significant difference in OS was observed between the NAC and upfront surgery groups (NAC: 5-year OS, 43.8%; upfront surgery: 5-year overall surgery, 57.5%; P = 0.167). Patients who underwent R0 resection showed significantly longer OS than did those who underwent R1, R2, or no resection (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis using age, perioperative chemotherapy, depth of invasion, LN metastasis, surgical radicality, postoperative pneumonia, and anastomotic leakage as covariates, LN metastasis [cN2: hazard ratio (HR), 1.389; P = 0.309; cN3: HR, 16.019; P = 0.012] and surgical radicality (R1: HR, 3.949; P = 0.009; R2 or no resection: HR, 2.912; P = 0.022) were shown to be significant independent prognostic factors. In clinical stage III ESCC patients, no significant difference in OS was observed between NAC and upfront surgery. Although potential patient selection bias might be a factor in this retrospective analysis, the noncurative resection rate was higher after NAC than after upfront surgery. The survival benefit of more intensive NAC needs to be further evaluated.
Matsuda S
，Tsubosa Y
，Sato H
，Takebayashi K
，Kawamorita K
，Mori K
，Niihara M
，Tsushima T
，Yokota T
，Onozawa Y
，Yasui H
，Takeuchi H
，Kitagawa Y
... -
《-》
ResearchGate
(全网免费下载)
钛学术
(全网免费下载)
