Stroke prevention with direct oral anticoagulants in high-risk elderly atrial fibrillation patients at increased bleeding risk.

Elderly atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with risk factors of bleeding are often considered ineligible for standard oral anticoagulants (OACs). The Edoxaban Low-Dose for EldeR CARE AF patients (ELDERCARE-AF) trial recently showed that edoxaban 15 mg/day was superior to placebo for preventing stroke or systemic embolism and did not result in a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding. Our aim was to investigate a real-world cohort of AF patients similar to the ELDERCARE-AF cohort, with regard to the impact of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use compared to non-OAC use, in relation to clinical outcomes. From 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2016, 15 183 AF patients aged ≥80 years (mean age 86.63 years [SD 4.79]; 48.7% male) with a congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (CHADS2) score ≥2 who met the enrolment criteria (generally similar to ELDERCARE-AF) were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their stroke prevention strategies, i.e. without OACs (n = 9084) and DOACs (n = 6099). Patients receiving DOACs were further stratified into reduced-dose- or full-dose-regimen groups. Compared with the non-OAC group as a reference, DOAC use (whether at reduced dose or full dose) was associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.88) and all-cause mortality (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.37-0.42), while the risks of intracranial haemorrhage and major bleeding were similar. The risks of composite outcomes of 'ischaemic stroke or mortality' (aHR 0.42, 95% CI 0.40-0.45) and 'ischaemic stroke or major bleeding or mortality' (aHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.46-0.52) were significantly lower with DOAC use. When compared with the non-OAC group as the reference group, DOACs (whether reduced dose or full dose) showed a positive net clinical benefit. The results were generally consistent even after propensity matching. In routine clinical care, DOACs (whether reduced or full dose) were associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke, mortality, and the composite endpoint, when compared with non-OAC use in high-risk elderly AF patients at increased bleeding risk. Our findings provide complementary 'real-world' data to support the generalizability of the results of the ELDERCARE-AF trial to other DOACs in daily clinical practice.

Chao TF ，Chan YH ，Chiang CE ，Tuan TC ，Liao JN ，Chen TJ ，Lip GYH ，Chen SA ... -  《-》

Clinical outcomes in elderly atrial fibrillation patients at increased bleeding risk treated with very low dose vs. regular-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a nationwide cohort study.

The Edoxaban Low-Dose for Elder Care Atrial Fibrillation Patients (ELDERCARE-AF) trial showed that edoxaban at a very low dosage (VLD) of 15 mg/day was more effective than a placebo at preventing stroke/systemic embolism without significantly increasing the risk of serious bleeding. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety for VLD non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) [edoxaban 15 mg o.d., dabigatran 110 or 150 o.d., apixaban 2.5 mg o.d., or rivaroxaban 10 mg (without the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease) or <10 mg o.d.] vs. regular-dosage (RD) NOACs (edoxaban 60/30 mg o.d. or other labeling-dosage NOACs) among a real-world cohort of elderly atrial fibrillation (AF) population similar to the ELDERCARE-AF cohort. In this nationwide retrospective cohort study from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), we identified a total of 7294 and 4151 consecutive AF patients aged 80 years or older with a CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 75 years or older, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack (2 points) score ≥2 who met the enrollment criteria (generally similar to ELDERCARE-AF) taking VLD and RD NOACs from 1 June 2012 to 31 December 2019, respectively. Propensity-score stabilized weighting (PSSW) was used to balance covariates across study groups. Patients were followed up from the first date of prescription for NOACs until the first occurrence of any study outcome, death, or until the end date of the study period (31 December 2020). After PSSW, VLD NOAC was associated with a comparable risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding but a higher risk of major adverse limb events (MALEs) requiring lower limb revascularization or amputation [hazard ratio (HR): 1.54, 95% confidential interval (CI): 1.09-2.18; P = 0.014), venous thrombosis (HR: 3.75, 95% CI: 1.56-8.97; P = 0.003), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.15-1.29; P <0.001) compared with RD NOACs. VLD NOACs showed worse outcomes in most net clinical outcome (NCO) benefits. The main result was consistent based on on-treatment analysis or accounting for death as a competing risk. In general, the advantage of NCOs for the RD NOACs over VLD NOACs persisted in most high-risk subgroups, consistent with the main analysis (P for interaction > 0.05). Use of VLD NOACs was associated with a greater risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, death as well as the composite outcomes, when compared with that of RD NOAC in high-risk elderly AF patients at increased bleeding risk. Thromboprophylaxis with RD NOAC is still preferable over VLD NOAC for the majority of elderly AF patients at increased bleeding risk.

Chan YH ，Chao TF ，Chen SW ，Lee HF ，Li PR ，Yeh YH ，Kuo CT ，See LC ，Lip GYH ... -  《-》

Effect of 15-mg Edoxaban on Clinical Outcomes in 3 Age Strata in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Prespecified Subanalysis of the ELDERCARE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kuroda M ，Tamiya E ，Nose T ，Ogimoto A ，Taura J ，Imamura Y ，Fukuzawa M ，Hayashi T ，Akao M ，Yamashita T ，Lip GYH ，Okumura K ... -  《-》

Outcomes and Safety of Very-Low-Dose Edoxaban in Frail Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the ELDERCARE-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Akashi S ，Oguri M ，Ikeno E ，Manita M ，Taura J ，Watanabe S ，Hayashi T ，Akao M ，Okumura K ，Akishita M ，Yamashita T ... -  《JAMA Network Open》

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in an Asian Population with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Dialysis: A Population-Based Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis.

Whether direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are more effective and safer than warfarin among Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing dialysis remains unclear. We first compared the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and major bleeding associated with DOACs compared with warfarin, in NVAF Asians undergoing dialysis using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) (Aim 1). Next, we searched PubMed and Medline from January 1, 2010 until January 31, 2020, to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all observational real-world studies comparing DOACs with warfarin specifically focused on NVAF patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis (Aim 2). Finally, we tested the hypothesis whether AF patients undergoing dialysis treated with OACs (warfarin and DOACs) would be associated with lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes as compared to those without OACs using the Taiwan NHIRD (Aim 3). From June 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017, a total of 3237 and 9263 NVAF patients comorbid with ESRD receiving oral anticoagulant (OACs) (490 on DOAC, 2747 on warfarin) or no OACs, respectively, were enrolled. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates across the study groups. For the comparison of DOAC vs. warfarin (Aim 1), DOACs had comparable risks of IS/SE and major bleeding to warfarin in our present cohort. From the original 85 results retrieved, nine studies (including our study) with a total of 6490 and 22,494 patients treated with DOACs and warfarin were included in the meta-analysis, respectively. There were 5343 (82%) and 20,337 (90%) patients treated with DOACs and warfarin undergoing dialysis, respectively. The pooled meta-analysis also indicated no difference of the effectiveness (HR:0.90; [95%CI:0.74-1.10]; P = 0.32) and safety outcomes (HR:0.75; [95%CI:0.54-1.05]; P = 0.09) between DOACs and warfarin (Aim 2). For the comparison of OAC (+) vs. OAC (-) (Aim 3), OAC-treatment was associated with a higher risk of IS/SE (hazard ratio (HR):1.54; [95% confidential interval (CI):1.29-1.84];P < 0.0001) and comparable risk of major bleeding compared to those without OAC treatment. DOACs did not provide benefit over warfarin regarding effectiveness and safety in AF patients undergoing dialysis. The use of OAC was not associated with a lower risk of IS/SE in ESRD AF patients when compared to those without OAC use.

See LC ，Lee HF ，Chao TF ，Li PR ，Liu JR ，Wu LS ，Chang SH ，Yeh YH ，Kuo CT ，Chan YH ，Lip GYH ... -  《-》