Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission after 5-azacitidine and venetoclax: a multicenter retrospective study.

The combination of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially for patients previously deemed unfit for curative-intent treatment. Some of these patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT); yet, there are scarce data regarding transplantation outcomes. We conducted a multicenter nationwide retrospective cohort study, including patients with AML who underwent alloHCT in CR1 after frontline treatment with azacitidine plus venetoclax only (aza-ven group). We collected a historical control group of patients who achieved CR1 after first-line intensive chemotherapy only, followed by alloHCT (intensive group). Patients in the aza-ven group (n = 24) were transplanted between 2019 and 2021. Compared to the intensive group, patients in the aza-ven group were older (median age 71.7 vs. 58.4 years), had higher incidence of therapy-related AML and AML with antecedent hematologic disorder and had more often adverse cytogenetics. They had a higher percentage of allografts from matched-unrelated donors, and reduced intensity conditioning was more commonly used. The estimated 12 months non relapse mortality was 19.1% in the aza-ven group and 11.8% in the intensive group. The estimated 12 months relapse-free survival and overall survival were 58% and 63% in the aza-ven group and 54% and 70% in the intensive group, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 6 months and of chronic GVHD at 12 months were 58% and 40% in the aza-ven group and 62% and 42% in the intensive group, respectively. Analysis of the aza-ven group revealed that HCT-CI score and ELN risk category were predictive of RFS in both univariate analysis as well as multivariate analysis. Our data suggests that alloHCT for AML patients achieving first CR with aza-ven appears feasible, with short-term post-transplant outcomes similar to those expected after traditional intensive chemotherapy.

Pasvolsky O ，Shimony S ，Ram R ，Shimoni A ，Shargian L ，Avni B ，Wolach O ，Shochat T ，Yerushalmi R ，Amit O ，Raanani P ，Yeshurun M ... -  《-》

Outcomes Are Similar After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients who Received Venetoclax + Azacitidine Versus Intensive Chemotherapy.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) after a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) achieves a remission from intensive chemotherapy (IC) is given with curative intent. Recently, venetoclax-based regimens have become the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are unfit for IC. If these patients achieve remission, they may also be considered for potentially curative consolidation with SCT. There are limited data comparing outcomes after SCT with these different induction strategies. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate depth of remission before SCT and outcomes after SCT in adults with nonrelapsed/refractory AML receiving pre-SCT therapy with either venetoclax/azacitidine (ven/aza) or IC. This was a retrospective, single-institution analysis of 169 patients receiving SCT in first remission after IC or ven/aza. Patient demographics and AML risk features were collected, as well as pre-SCT measurable residual disease (MRD) assessed by flow cytometry and molecular methods. Relapse, transplantation-related mortality, incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), and death from any cause were also recorded. Descriptive and survival statistics were applied to these data to compare IC and ven/aza groups. Cox proportional hazard models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses. We demonstrate that despite differences in baseline factors between these groups, outcomes were similar. Relapse-free and overall survival, as well as cumulative incidences of transplantation-related mortality, relapse, and acute and chronic GVHD were comparable between groups. Exploring survival in younger (<65 years) versus older (≥65 years) patients by treatment group did not alter these results. Finally, although pre-SCT MRD by flow cytometry was significantly predictive of post-SCT relapse and survival in the IC + SCT patients, it was not significantly predictive of relapse and survival in the ven/aza + SCT patients. Although these findings require prospective validation in a larger cohort of patients, they suggest that ven/aza followed by SCT is a reasonable management strategy for transplantation candidates at any age.

Winters AC ，Bosma G ，Abbott D ，Minhajuddin M ，Jordan C ，Pollyea DA ，Gutman JA ... -  《-》

[Short-term efficacy of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia: a single-institution experience].

Yu WJ ，Jia JS ，Wang J ，Tang FF ，Gong LZ ，Liu XH ，Zhu XL ，Zhao XS ，Huang XJ ，Jiang H ... -  《-》

Efficacy of Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Compared to Azacitidine Monotherapy: Real-World Experience.

The combination of venetoclax (VEN) and azacitidine (AZA) (VEN+AZA) leads to higher complete remission rates and longer overall survival (OS) in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive combination chemotherapy. In practice, the doses of VEN and AZA are reduced at the attending physician's discretion to avoid adverse events; however, the impact of dose and duration reductions has not been fully clarified. We analyzed whether the efficacy was maintained with reduced VEN+AZA compared to AZA monotherapy in the real world. A total of 33 patients were included; 17 (10 newly diagnosed, 7 primary refractory or relapsed) received VEN+AZA, and 16 (7 newly diagnosed, 9 primary refractory or relapsed) received AZA. We analyzed complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates, OS, and the incidence of adverse events. CR/CRi were achieved in 7/17 (41.2%) and 11/17 (64.7%) patients in the VEN+AZA group and 0/15 (0%) and 2/15 (6.7%) patients in the AZA group, respectively. The CR/CRi rate was higher in the VEN+AZA group than in the AZA group (p=0.001). OS was longer in the VEN+AZA group than in the AZA group (p=0.03), with a median of 506 days [95% confidence interval (CI)=234-585 days] and 208 days (95% CI=52-343 days), respectively. The doses of the VEN+AZA combination were reduced at the attending physician's discretion, resulting in a higher CR/CRi rate and longer OS than AZA monotherapy and is considered useful for AML in the real world.

Baba Y ，Hida N ，Sambe T ，Abe M ，Kabasawa N ，Sakai H ，Yoshimura K ，Fukuda T ... -  《-》

Lower intensity therapy with cladribine/low dose cytarabine/venetoclax in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia compares favorably with intensive chemotherapy among patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains the best consolidative modality in most patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Along with factors directly pertaining to SCT, pretransplantation disease control, performance status, and prior treatment-related complications are important factors that affect posttransplantation survival outcomes. The authors compared the survival outcomes of patients ≥60 years of age treated on the phase 2 clinical trial of venetoclax (Ven) added to cladribine (CLAD) and low dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with azacitidine (CLAD/LDAC/Ven arm) (NCT03586609) who underwent allogeneic SCT in first remission to a retrospective cohort of patients ≥60 years of age who underwent SCT after intensive chemotherapy. Intensive chemotherapy was defined as the use of cytarabine >1 g/m2 and anthracyclines during induction/consolidation. Thirty-five patients at median age of 68 years in the CLAD/LDAC/Ven arm were compared to 42 patients at a median age of 62 years in the intensive therapy arm. The 2-year relapse-free survival was superior with CLAD/LDAC/Ven versus intensive chemotherapy (88% vs. 65%; p = .03) whereas the 2-year overall survival (OS) was comparable (84% vs. 70%; p = .14). On a competing event analysis, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was significantly lower with CLAD/LDAC/Ven versus intensive chemotherapy (2.9% vs. 17.2%, Gray's p = .049) whereas nonrelapse mortality was comparable (16.2% vs. 17.1%; p = .486). In conclusion, treatment with CLAD/LDAC/Ven was associated with favorable outcomes in older patients who underwent subsequent allogeneic SCT. The OS was comparable to that with intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic SCT, but the CIR rate was significantly lower.

Senapati J ，Kantarjian HM ，Bazinet A ，Reville P ，Short NJ ，Daver N ，Borthakur G ，Bataller A ，Jabbour E ，DiNardo C ，Haddad F ，Sasaki K ，Popat U ，Oran B ，Alousi AM ，Loghavi S ，Shpall E ，Garcia-Manero G ，Ravandi F ，Kadia TM ... -  《-》