Anti-PD1 antibody enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of MUC1-MBP fusion protein vaccine via increasing Th1, Tc1 activity and decreasing the proportion of MDSC in the B16-MUC1 melanoma mouse model.

In previous studies, we have obtained a notable anti-tumor efficacy of the recombinant MUC1-MBP vaccine in the process of mouse B16-MUC1 melanoma treatment. However, the tumor cannot be eliminated completely. We found that the tumor inhibition rate decreased from 81.67% (five immunizations) to 43.67% (eight immunizations) after more than five immunizations, indicating persistent vaccine stimulation may activate immunosuppressive factors. In the present study, we revealed that programmed cell death 1 (PD1), an inhibitory molecule suppressing T cell function, expressed on splenic and tumor-infiltrating T cells were up-regulated by the vaccine. Therefore, to optimize the anti-tumor efficacy of the vaccine, we employed combination immunotherapy with MUC1-MBP vaccine and αPD1 (anti-PD1 antibody). Results showed that combination immunotherapy induced a more remarkable anti-tumor efficacy, the tumor clearance being increased to 80% from 20% which obtain by MUC1-MBP vaccine immunizations. To investigate the possible underlying mechanism, IFN-γ secretion and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) cytotoxicity were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and xCELLigence real-time cell analyzer (RTCA) respectively. T cell subsets and immunosuppressive cells in the mouse spleen and tumor microenvironment were analyzed by FACS. Results showed that the proportion of splenic CD8+T cells and tumor infiltration was increased and the activity of CTL killing, T helper 1 (Th1), Type 1 CD8+T (Tc1) was enhanced, indicating that the anti-tumor efficacy enhanced by combination immunotherapy was mainly through boosting CD8+T cells mediated anti-tumor cellular immunity. Additionally, combination immunotherapy significantly decreased the splenic and tumor-infiltrating myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). These results demonstrated that combination immunotherapy with MUC1-MBP vaccine and αPD1 was capable to invoke a more potent anti-tumor immune response and provide a foundation for further research.

Zhang Z ，Zhou H ，Liu Y ，Ren J ，Wang J ，Sang Q ，Lan Y ，Wu Y ，Yuan H ，Ni W ，Tai G ... -  《-》

The Effect of Different Immunization Cycles of a Recombinant Mucin1-Maltose-Binding Protein Vaccine on T Cell Responses to B16-MUC1 Melanoma in Mice.

Zhou H ，Zhang Z ，Liu G ，Jiang M ，Wang J ，Liu Y ，Tai G ... -  《INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES》

Pre-clinical toxicity and immunogenicity evaluation of a MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine.

Mucin 1 (MUC1), as an oncogene, plays a key role in the progression and tumorigenesis of many human adenocarcinomas and is an attractive target in tumor immunotherapy. Our previous study showed that the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine induced a MUC1-specific Th1-dominant immune response, simulated MUC1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte killing activity, and could significantly inhibit MUC1-expression B16 cells' growth in mice. To help move the vaccine into a Phase I clinical trial, in the current study, a pre-clinical toxicity and immunogenicity evaluation of the vaccine was conducted. The evaluation was comprised of a single-dose acute toxicity study in mice, repeat-dose chronic toxicity and immunogenicity studies in rats, and pilot toxicity and immunogenicity studies in cynomolgus monkeys. The results showed that treatment with the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine did not cause any organ toxicity, except for arthritis or local nodules induced by BCG in several rats. Furthermore, the vaccine significantly increased the levels of IFN-γ in rats, indicating that Th1 cells were activated. In addition, the results showed that the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine induced a MUC1-specific IgG antibody response both in rats and cynomolgus monkeys. Collectively, these data are beneficial to move the MUC1-MBP/BCG anti-tumor vaccine into a Phase I clinical trial.

Hu B ，Wang J ，Guo Y ，Chen T ，Ni W ，Yuan H ，Zhang N ，Xie F ，Tai G ... -  《-》

MUC1 and maltose‑binding protein recombinant fusion protein combined with Bacillus Calmette‑Guerin induces MUC1‑specific and nonspecific anti‑tumor immunity in mice.

Fang F ，Ma J ，Ni W ，Wang F ，Sun X ，Li Y ，Li Q ，Xie F ，Wang J ，Zhai R ，Liu Z ，Gao S ，Tai G ... -  《-》

TIGIT and PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Pathways Are Associated With Patient Outcome and Anti-Tumor Immunity in Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains an aggressive brain tumor with a high rate of mortality. Immune checkpoint (IC) molecules are expressed on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and promote T cell exhaustion upon binding to IC ligands expressed by the tumor cells. Interfering with IC pathways with immunotherapy has promoted reactivation of anti-tumor immunity and led to success in several malignancies. However, IC inhibitors have achieved limited success in GBM patients, suggesting that other checkpoint molecules may be involved with suppressing TIL responses. Numerous IC pathways have been described, with current testing of inhibitors underway in multiple clinical trials. Identification of the most promising checkpoint pathways may be useful to guide the future trials for GBM. Here, we analyzed the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) transcriptomic database and identified PD1 and TIGIT as top putative targets for GBM immunotherapy. Additionally, dual blockade of PD1 and TIGIT improved survival and augmented CD8+ TIL accumulation and functions in a murine GBM model compared with either single agent alone. Furthermore, we demonstrated that this combination immunotherapy affected granulocytic/polymorphonuclear (PMN) myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) but not monocytic (Mo) MDSCs in in our murine gliomas. Importantly, we showed that suppressive myeloid cells express PD1, PD-L1, and TIGIT-ligands in human GBM tissue, and demonstrated that antigen specific T cell proliferation that is inhibited by immunosuppressive myeloid cells can be restored by TIGIT/PD1 blockade. Our data provide new insights into mechanisms of GBM αPD1/αTIGIT immunotherapy.

Raphael I ，Kumar R ，McCarl LH ，Shoger K ，Wang L ，Sandlesh P ，Sneiderman CT ，Allen J ，Zhai S ，Campagna ML ，Foster A ，Bruno TC ，Agnihotri S ，Hu B ，Castro BA ，Lieberman FS ，Broniscer A ，Diaz AA ，Amankulor NM ，Rajasundaram D ，Pollack IF ，Kohanbash G ... -  《Frontiers in Immunology》