Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma.

The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are "POLE-mutated" (POLEmut), "microsatellite-instable/mismatch repair-deficient" (MSI/MMRd), "TP53-mutated/p53-abnormal" (TP53mut/p53abn), and "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP). Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021. Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050. Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts. POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined.

Travaglino A ，Raffone A ，Raimondo D ，Arciuolo D ，Angelico G ，Valente M ，Scaglione G ，D'alessandris N ，Casadio P ，Inzani F ，Mollo A ，Santoro A ，Seracchioli R ，Franco Zannoni G ... -  《-》

TCGA molecular subgroups of endometrial carcinoma in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: A quantitative systematic review.

Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) shares morphological and molecular features with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Several studies assessed the four TCGA groups of EEC, i.e. POLE-mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP) and p53-abnormal (p53abn), in OEC; however, it is unclear whether the TCGA groups have the same distribution and clinicopathological features between OEC and EEC. To assess the distribution and clinicopathological features of the TCGA groups in OEC. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out by searching 7 electronic databases from January 2013 to April 2021 for studies assessing the TCGA classification in OEC. Prevalence of each TCGA group in OEC and of FIGO grade 3 and stage>I was pooled using a random-effect model. Prevalence of TCGA groups was compared between OEC and EEC, extracting EEC data from a previous meta-analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses were performed for progression-free survival (PFS). A significant p-value<0.05 was adopted. Four studies with 785 patients were included. The frequency of the TCGA groups in OEC vs EEC was: POLEmut = 5% vs 7.6% (p = 0.594); MMRd = 14.6% vs 29.2% (p < 0.001); p53abn = 14% vs 7.8% (p = 0.097); NSMP = 66.4% vs 55.4% (p = 0.002). The pooled prevalence of FIGO grade 3 was: POLEmut = 19.2%; MMRd = 18.3%; p53abn = 38.1%; NSMP = 14.5%. The pooled prevalence of FIGO stage >I was: POLEmut = 31.6%; MMRd = 42.8%; p53abn = 48.5%; NSMP = 24.6%. Two-, 5- and 10-year PFS was: POLEmut = 100%, 100%, and 100%; MMRd = 89.1%, 82.2% and 73.3%; p53abn = 61.7%, 50.2% and 39.6%; NSMP = 87.7%, 79.6% and 65.5%. The hazard ratio for disease progression (reference = NSMP) was: POLEmut = not estimable (no events); MMRd = 0.825 (p = 0.626); p53abn = 2.786 (p = 0.001). The prognostic value of the TCGA groups was similar between OEC and EEC, despite the differences in the frequency and pathological features of each group.

D'Alessandris N ，Travaglino A ，Santoro A ，Arciuolo D ，Scaglione G ，Raffone A ，Inzani F ，Zannoni GF ... -  《-》

Molecular Classification of Grade 3 Endometrioid Endometrial Cancers Identifies Distinct Prognostic Subgroups.

Bosse T ，Nout RA ，McAlpine JN ，McConechy MK ，Britton H ，Hussein YR ，Gonzalez C ，Ganesan R ，Steele JC ，Harrison BT ，Oliva E ，Vidal A ，Matias-Guiu X ，Abu-Rustum NR ，Levine DA ，Gilks CB ，Soslow RA ... -  《-》

Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of 'multiple-classifier' endometrial carcinomas.

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular classification based on four molecular subclasses identified in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has gained relevance in recent years due to its prognostic utility and potential to predict benefit from adjuvant treatment. While most ECs can be classified based on a single classifier (POLE exonuclease domain mutations - POLEmut, MMR deficiency - MMRd, p53 abnormal - p53abn), a small but clinically relevant group of tumours harbour more than one molecular classifying feature and are referred to as 'multiple-classifier' ECs. We aimed to describe the clinicopathological and molecular features of multiple-classifier ECs with abnormal p53 (p53abn). Within a cohort of 3518 molecularly profiled ECs, 107 (3%) tumours displayed p53abn in addition to another classifier(s), including 64 with MMRd (MMRd-p53abn), 31 with POLEmut (POLEmut-p53abn), and 12 with all three aberrations (MMRd-POLEmut-p53abn). MMRd-p53abn ECs and POLEmut-p53abn ECs were mostly grade 3 endometrioid ECs, early stage, and frequently showed morphological features characteristic of MMRd or POLEmut ECs. 18/28 (60%) MMRd-p53abn ECs and 7/15 (46.7%) POLEmut-p53abn ECs showed subclonal p53 overexpression, suggesting that TP53 mutation was a secondary event acquired during tumour progression. Hierarchical clustering of TCGA ECs by single nucleotide variant (SNV) type and somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) revealed that MMRd-p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single-classifier MMRd tumours (20/23) rather than single-classifier p53abn tumours (3/23), while POLEmut-p53abn tumours mostly clustered with single-classifier POLEmut tumours (12/13) and seldom with single-classifier p53abn tumours (1/13) (both p ≤ 0.001, chi-squared test). Finally, the clinical outcome of patients with MMRd-p53abn and POLEmut-p53abn ECs [stage I 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 92.2% and 94.1%, respectively] was significantly different from single-classifier p53abn EC (stage I RFS 70.8%, p = 0.024 and p = 0.050, respectively). Our results support the classification of MMRd-p53abn EC as MMRd and POLEmut-p53abn EC as POLEmut. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

León-Castillo A ，Gilvazquez E ，Nout R ，Smit VT ，McAlpine JN ，McConechy M ，Kommoss S ，Brucker SY ，Carlson JW ，Epstein E ，Rau TT ，Soslow RA ，Ganesan R ，Matias-Guiu X ，Oliva E ，Harrison BT ，Church DN ，Gilks CB ，Bosse T ... -  《-》

TCGA molecular classification in endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas: Novel data on clear cell carcinoma.

Clear cell and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (OCC and OEC, respectively) have a presumed origin in endometriosis and share molecular alterations with each other and with their endometrial counterparts. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based molecular classification stratifies endometrial carcinomas into four categories: POLE mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), p53 abnormal (p53abn) and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) with divergent prognoses. The subsequent studies are indicative that this TCGA classification has some value in OEC, but the knowledge related to OCC is limited. Endometrial carcinoma molecular classification was evaluated and compared in a large series of OCCs (n = 115) and OECs (n = 158). POLE mutation analysis and tissue microarray-based immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair and p53 proteins were performed. The distribution to the molecular groups was as follows: POLEmut 0.9%/3.2%, MMRd 3.5%/6.3%, p53abn 20%/30%, and NSMP 76%/60% in OCCs/OECs, respectively. The proportion of NSMP tumors was the largest in both histological types and significantly higher in OCC than OEC (p = 0.009). The molecular classification correlated significantly with DSS in both OCCs and OECs (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively), and with DFS in OCCs (p = 0.001). POLEmut and MMRd OCCs carried excellent prognosis, whereas MMRd OECs presented with poorer outcome. The p53abn group was associated with the poorest prognosis in both tumor types, particularly emphasized in OCCs. TCGA molecular classification associated with patient outcome in both histotypes, and the difference in prognosis between the molecular groups was even more marked in OCC. The large amount of NSMP tumors highlights the need for further studies.

Similä-Maarala J ，Soovares P ，Pasanen A ，Ahvenainen T ，Vahteristo P ，Bützow R ，Lassus H ... -  《-》