Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 in Head and Neck Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

The monoclonal antibodies anti-programmed death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the first immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) approved for treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck carcinoma R/M HNSCC in first line and in platinum refractory disease. This network meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of anti-PD-1- vs anti-PD-L1-based therapy in R/M HNSCC cancer patients through a systematic review of the literature to provide support for evidence-based treatment decisions. In particular, the effectiveness of ICIs for R/M HNSCC is analyzed according to the different mechanisms of action of the check-points inhibitory drugs in different subgroups of patients. We did a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science. Our search identified a total of five randomized controlled trials: Keynote 040, Keynote 048, Eagle, Condor, Checkmate 141. These trials included 3001 patients. Treatment was sub-categorized into PD-L1-based, PD-1-based, and standard chemotherapy. Treatments were indirectly compared with anti-PD-L1-based therapy. The network meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in OS between different subgroups except for the metastatic patients in which anti-PD-1-based therapy was associated with significantly less risk of death. Furthermore, anti-PD-1-based therapy appeared to be effective in smoker patients and in human papilloma-negative (HPV) patients. Conversely, anti-PD-L1-based therapy seems to be better efficient in female patients, in locally recurrent setting and in HPV positive patients. This is the first NMA study that aimed to indirectly compare anti-PD-1- and anti-PD-L1-based therapy in HNSCC patients. The results of our NMA could help define a profile of patient responder or resistant to specific classes of immune drugs and can be used to guide/design future studies in the novel scenario of precision immune-oncology.

Botticelli A ，Cirillo A ，Strigari L ，Valentini F ，Cerbelli B ，Scagnoli S ，Cerbelli E ，Zizzari IG ，Rocca CD ，D'Amati G ，Polimeni A ，Nuti M ，Merlano MC ，Mezi S ，Marchetti P ... -  《Frontiers in Immunology》

Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1-Axis Blockade in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Stratified by Human Papillomavirus Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors have provided clinical benefit to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients in recent clinical trials. However, it remains unclear as to whether human papillomavirus (HPV) status is associated with improved clinical outcome of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in HNSCC. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched up to February 28, 2021. Published clinical trials of HNSCC patients treated with only PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were selected. The primary or secondary outcome of these studies included objective response rate (ORR) stratified by HPV status. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) were estimated using a fixed-effect model. A total of seven eligible studies comprising 814 patients were included. The ORR of HPV positive HNSCC patients was significantly higher than that of HPV negative HNSCC patients (OR = 1.77; 95%CI = 1.14-2.74; P = 0.01), and this favorable effect occurred in pooled anti-PD-L1 trials (OR = 2.66; 95%CI = 1.16-6.11; P = 0.02). In comparison, the pooled OR was 1.51 in anti-PD-1 trials (95%CI = 0.90-2.54; P = 0.12). Survival analysis indicated that HPV positive HNSCC patients had a lower risk of overall death as compared to HPV negative HNSCC patients (HR = 0.77; 95%CI = 0.60-0.99; P = 0.04). HPV positive HNSCC patients display improved outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade as compared to HPV negative HNSCC patients. These improved outcomes are likely driven to a greater extent by anti-PD-L1 inhibitors. However, randomized controlled trials with greater numbers of patients are needed for validation of these early findings.

Xu Y ，Zhu G ，Maroun CA ，Wu IXY ，Huang D ，Seiwert TY ，Liu Y ，Mandal R ，Zhang X ... -  《Frontiers in Immunology》

The effects of checkpoint inhibition on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most frequent malignancy worldwide. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-CTLA-4 anti-PD-l and anti-PD-L1 has shown promising results in treating patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. We aimed to systematically review the literature on immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors as treatment for advanced HNSCC. PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched with the purpose of identifying all studies addressing the effects of checkpoint inhibitors as treatment for HNSCC in human clinical trials. We assessed effects of the treatment with checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HPV-status, PD-L1-status, and adverse events. We identified eight studies (n = 1431 patients) with an OS ranging from 7.5 to 14.9 months in PD-1 checkpoint inhibition. Two studies (n = 541 patients) observed a significantly (p = 0.01) and (p = 0.007) longer OS with checkpoint inhibition compared to standard-treatment, platinum-based chemotherapy (7.5 versus 5.1 months and 14.9 months versus 10.7 months). Two studies (n = 411 patients) found an increased OS associated with PD-L1-postive patients compared to PD-L1-negative patients. The eight studies have heterogenous design with only three being randomized. Few clinical trials have investigated the treatment with checkpoint inhibition for HNSCC. Solely, two randomized studies comprising 240 patients treated with nivolumab (anti-PD-L) and 301 patients treated with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-L) showed a significantly prolonged survival in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC compared with standard-treatment. There is a further need for randomized clinical trials investigating a putative role of checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of advanced HNSCC.

Ghanizada M ，Jakobsen KK ，Grønhøj C ，von Buchwald C ... -  《-》

Immunotherapy in recurrent and or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Saada-Bouzid E ，Peyrade F ，Guigay J 《-》

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review of phase-3 clinical trials.

The outcomes of patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who are not candidates for local salvage therapy and of those diagnosed with recurrent or metastatic disease are dismal. A relatively new systemic therapy option that emerged in recent years in the treatment of advanced HNSCC is immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The safety profile and anti-tumor activity of these agents demonstrated in early phase clinical trials paved the way to the initiation of several promising phase-3 trials in the field. To evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of ICIs in HNSCC, based on published phase-3 clinical trials. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus to identify published literature evaluating immunotherapy using ICIs in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC) and locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). We used a combination of standardized search terms and keywords including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, recurrent, metastatic, locally advanced, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and phase-3 clinical trial. A sensitive search filter was used to limit our results to randomized controlled trials. Five phase-3 clinical trials have reported the data on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in HNSCC so far: Four in R/M HNSCC and one in LAHNSCC. In patients with R/M HNSCC, anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated improved survival benefits in the second-line treatment setting compared to the standard of care (standard single-agent systemic therapy). While the net gain in overall survival (OS) with nivolumab was 2.4 mo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, P = 0.01], that with pembrolizumab was 1.5 mo (HR = 0.80 nominal P = 0.0161). The anti-PD-L1 agent durvalumab with or without the anti-cytotoxic T- lymphocyte associated protein-4 agent tremelimumab did not result in any beneficial outcomes. In the first-line setting, in R/M HNSCC, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy resulted in significant improvement in survival with a net gain in OS of 2.3 mo (HR = 0.77, P = 0.0034) in the overall population and a net gain in OS of 4.2 mo in the PD-L1 positive (combined positive score > 20) population compared to standard of care (EXTREME regime). In patients with PD-L1 positive R/M HNSCC, monotherapy with pembrolizumab also demonstrated statistically significant improvement in survival compared to EXTREME. In LAHNSCC, immunotherapy using avelumab (an anti-PD-L1 agent) along with standard chemoradiation therapy did not result in improved outcomes compared to placebo plus chemoradiation therapy. Anti-PD-1 agents provide survival benefits in R/M HNSCC in the first and second-line settings, with acceptable toxicity profiles compared to standard therapy. There is no proven efficacy in the curative setting to date.

Poulose JV ，Kainickal CT 《-》