Far Forward Behavioral Health Service Delivery in Future Combat Environments: A Qualitative Needs Assessment.

It is expected that future multi-domain operational (MDO) combat environments will be characterized by limited capabilities for immediate combat stress control support services for soldiers or immediate evacuation from theater. The operational requirements of the future battlefield make it unlikely that current models for behavioral health (BH) treatment could be implemented without significant adjustments. We conducted a qualitative study with Special Forces medics and operators and soldiers who had deployed to austere conditions in small groups in an effort to inform construction of a BH service delivery model for an MDO environment. The objectives of this study were (1) characterizing stressors and BH issues that were encountered and (2) describing mitigation strategies and resources that were useful or needed in these types of deployments. Six focus groups were conducted at three army installations with 23 active duty soldiers, including three groups of medics using a semi-structured interview guide focused on stressors they encountered during deployments to austere conditions, and the impact of those stressors on mission and focus. Focus group recordings were transcribed, imported into NVivo software (version 12), and independently coded by two researchers. An analysis was then conducted to develop themes across participants. The study was reviewed by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research Human Subjects Protection Board. Behavioral health concerns were commonly cited as a stressor in far forward environments. Other common stressors included ineffective or inexperienced leaders, as well as poor team dynamics (e.g., communication and cohesion). Four primary strategies were mentioned as mitigations for deployment stressors: leadership, morale, resilience training, and strength of the team. When asked about resources or training that would have helped with these types of deployments, participants frequently mentioned the availability of BH providers and development of new and realistic BH skills trainings for non-providers and leaders. Current models for treating BH problems need to be adapted for the future MDO environments in which soldiers will be expected to deploy. Understanding what issues need to be addressed in these environments and how they can best be delivered is an important first step. This study is the first to use qualitative results from those who have already deployed to such environments to describe the stressors and BH issues that were most commonly encountered, the mitigation strategies used, and the resources that were useful or needed.

Wilk JE ，Clarke-Walper KM ，Nugent KL ，Curley JM ，Crouch C ... -  《-》

Development of Training to Prepare Army Medics to Address Behavioral Health Needs of Soldiers in Far-Forward Environments Utilizing Mobile App Technology.

Multi-domain operational combat environments will likely restrict key components of current behavioral health (BH) service delivery models. Combat teams in far-forward outposts or extended missions may need to rely on their own internal assets to manage combat and operational stress reactions for extended periods of time. As such, combat medics are expected to take on additional responsibilities as providers of BH support for isolated teams. As they receive limited BH training, medics require additional training to sufficiently respond to combat and operational stress reactions in their assigned teams. This study provided combat medics with a BH training and a mobile application-based support tool that would assist them in identifying and responding to BH concerns in their soldiers. The current analysis examines pre- to post-training changes in attitudes related to utilizing BH skills. We created a brief training aimed to increase medics' ability and confidence regarding managing BH issues. Its development was part of a study on the feasibility of the Soldier and Medic Autonomous Connectivity Independent System for Remote Environments (AIRE) apps (NOCTEM, LLC), a digital system designed for far-forward BH and sleep monitoring and management. Participants were combat medics from two Army combat brigades preparing for a training rotation through a combat training center (CTC). A total of 16 medics consented to participation with nine medics available at the follow-up after the field exercise. Medics were surveyed before the training and after their return from the CTC. In pre-training surveys, most medics indicated it was within their scope to assess for stress/anxiety, suicidal risk, stress reaction, and sleep problems; assist soldiers with optimizing work performance; and provide interventions for BH concerns and sleep problems. Less than half believed it was within their scope to assess and address team communication issues or provide intervention for stress reactions. After the CTC rotation, more medics endorsed that it was in their scope to provide interventions for acute stress reactions to traumatic events. Before the CTC rotation, at most 60% of the group felt at least moderately confident in utilizing the BH skills of discussing problems, assessing for concerns, and providing interventions. After CTC, the confidence levels for each skill increased or remained the same for most medics. Intervention skills had the highest proportion of medics (66%) reporting increased confidence in using the skills. A larger proportion of medics believed it was within their scope of work and felt confident in assessing BH problems, and a smaller proportion believed it is within their scope of work and felt confident in applying interventions. The training increased most medics' confidence to administer interventions for BH and team communication issues. Similar training programs can help medics serve as support for a wide variety of circumstances when the brigade's mental health teams are inaccessible. Additionally, the Medic AIRE app expanded the ability to evaluate and provide interventions without extensive training in treatment modalities or BH conditions. This concept shows promise for providing medics with actionable tools when training time is limited such as during preparation for extended deployments.

Mesias GA ，Nugent KL ，Wolfson M ，Clarke-Walper KM ，Germain A ，Sampson MK ，Wilk JE ... -  《-》

Combat Medics' Preparedness to Serve as Behavioral Health Extenders in Forward Environments.

Future multidomain operational combat environments will require combat medics to play a larger role in managing behavioral health (BH) conditions in forward environments, as soldiers in small teams may have them as their sole medical support for extended periods of time. Previously they were not expected to serve in this role, and thus, they receive minimal BH training. It is unknown to what extent combat medics consider BH tasks as falling within their scope of practice and how often they engage with their soldiers currently related to BH. Qualitative research suggests that many medics feel inadequately prepared to handle BH problems. Our aim is to further assess medic attitudes and behaviors related to BH to better understand the landscape of medic preparedness to fill an expanded role. Data from 292 medics were collected before their participation in the BH Guidelines for mEdic Assessment and Response training, a day-long training for medics expected to deploy to far-forward environments. We investigated whether combat medics engage with their soldiers in areas related to BH, the extent to which they consider BH-related tasks as part of their scope of practice, and how confident they feel engaging in various BH-related tasks. We explored associations between medics' attitudes related to BH scope of practice and confidence performing BH tasks with gender, rank, component (National Guard vs. Active Duty), work-related BH experience, having suicide training in the past year, and having ever sought help for BH. Results indicated that in the past month, 61.4% of medics discussed BH issues, 48.3% assessed BH problems, and 41.3% provided interventions for BH problems with at least one soldier in their unit. Assessment tasks were more frequently endorsed as falling within medic's scope of practice (75%-95%) than intervention tasks (62%-83%). More medics felt confident doing assessments (39%-49% moderately confident or greater) than providing interventions (31%-37% moderately confident or greater). Medics expressed highest confidence in assessing for suicide risk (49% moderate confidence or greater). Medics with a lot of prior BH work experience and non-commissioned officers (as compared to junior enlisted) reported greater confidence in most tasks. Receiving suicide training in the past year was associated with greater confidence assessing for suicide, as well as providing interventions for suicide, general BH problems, and substance abuse. Most medics agreed that numerous BH tasks fell within the scope of their work, but few felt confident engaging in those tasks. These findings support a need for additional training in BH-related tasks across the force. Exploring ways to provide medics BH-related work rotations would augment their general proficiency as first-line treatment providers for soldiers in combat units, and increased training in BH-related tasks should be studied to determine its ability to increase competency and confidence. If medics can learn to assess and recognize BH concerns before they escalate to needing specialty BH care, this could potentially reduce the burden on BH clinics, as well as strengthen the overall force.

Mesias GA ，Nugent KL ，Clarke-Walper KM ，Sampson MK ，Wilk JE ... -  《-》

Prototyping Apps for the Management of Sleep, Fatigue, and Behavioral Health in Austere Far-Forward Environments: Development Study.

Military service inherently includes frequent periods of high-stress training, operational tempo, and sustained deployments to austere far-forward environments. These occupational requirements can contribute to acute and chronic sleep disruption, fatigue, and behavioral health challenges related to acute and chronic stress and disruption of team dynamics. To date, there is no centralized mobile health platform that supports self- and supervised detection, monitoring, and management of sleep and behavioral health issues in garrison and during and after deployments. The objective of this study was to adapt a clinical decision support platform for use outside clinical settings, in garrison, and during field exercises by medics and soldiers to monitor and manage sleep and behavioral health in operational settings. To adapt an existing clinical decision support digital health platform, we first gathered system, content, and context-related requirements for a sleep and behavioral health management system from experts. Sleep and behavioral health assessments were then adapted for prospective digital data capture. Evidence-based and operationally relevant educational and interventional modules were formatted for digital delivery. These modules addressed the management and mitigation of sleep, circadian challenges, fatigue, stress responses, and team communication. Connectivity protocols were adapted to accommodate the absence of cellular or Wi-Fi access in deployed settings. The resulting apps were then tested in garrison and during 2 separate field exercises. Based on identified requirements, 2 Android smartphone apps were adapted for self-monitoring and management for soldiers (Soldier app) and team supervision and intervention by medics (Medic app). A total of 246 soldiers, including 28 medics, received training on how to use the apps. Both apps function as expected under conditions of limited connectivity during field exercises. Areas for future technology enhancement were also identified. We demonstrated the feasibility of adapting a clinical decision support platform into Android smartphone-based apps to collect, save, and synthesize sleep and behavioral health data, as well as share data using adaptive data transfer protocols when Wi-Fi or cellular data are unavailable. The AIRE (Autonomous Connectivity Independent System for Remote Environments) prototype offers a novel self-management and supervised tool to augment capabilities for prospective monitoring, detection, and intervention for emerging sleep, fatigue, and behavioral health issues that are common in military and nonmilitary high-tempo occupations (eg, submarines, long-haul flights, space stations, and oil rigs) where medical expertise is limited.

Germain A ，Wolfson M ，Pulantara IW ，Wallace ML ，Nugent K ，Mesias G ，Clarke-Walper K ，Quartana PJ ，Wilk J ... -  《JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH》

Soldier Attitudes Toward Behavioral Health Profiles in the US Army.

Behavioral health (BH) readiness is a critical component of U.S. Army personnel readiness. Medical providers issue BH profiles in order to communicate BH-related duty limitations to the commander and reflect BH force readiness on both micro/macro-levels. A recent report indicates BH profile underutilization may be significantly elevating U.S. Army safety and mission-failure risks, and a study of BH provider decision-making suggests some providers may be hesitant to use profiles due to concerns that soldiers' attitudes toward BH profiles may negatively impact treatment utilization. This potential link, however, has not been empirically examined. This study addresses this gap by assessing soldiers' attitudes towards BH profiles to better understand how BH profiles may impact treatment utilization and explore for any BH profile-related stigma effect. Approved by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Institutional Review Board as part of the Land Combat Study II, the survey specific to this study included eight WRAIR-developed items assessing soldier attitudes toward BH profiles. Soldiers (N = 1,043) from two active duty U.S. Army brigades completed cross-sectional, anonymous surveys in 2017-2018. Soldier self-reported BH care utilization was assessed and used to create sub-groups for analysis. A majority of soldiers indicated that being placed on a BH profile would make them as or more likely to seek (71%) and no more or less likely to drop out (84%) of BH care. Among soldiers who had received BH care, BH profiles were associated with more favorable treatment seeking attitudes among those inclined to access conventional BH services and less favorable treatment seeking and maintenance attitudes among those inclined to access BH services from sources incapable of issuing profiles. Negative attitudes towards BH profiles were significantly more prevalent when compared to physical injury profiles, except in the group who had received BH care from a source incapable of issuing a profile. No significant proportional differences were observed among soldiers toward the rationale for BH profiles. Almost all soldiers (95% or greater) preferred their BH condition not come to the commander's attention during pre-deployment screening (SRP), choosing either BH profile or crisis options instead. Results suggest soldiers who would be less likely to seek or more likely to drop out of BH care due to a BH profile may be those that are less likely to access conventional BH services in the first place. This may provide some preliminary reassurance to conventional providers that increased BH profiling practices may not be inversely proportional to the amount of BH care delivered and may encourage treatment-seeking behaviors among the population they serve. Soldiers seeking BH care from sources incapable of issuing a profile may be sensitive to a potential BH profile-related stigma effect (possibly more global profile-related effect in this group), which should be factored into policy outreach efforts. A BH profile represents a more palatable BH duty limitation disclosure option for many soldiers, and supports the merits of a disclosure process that is earlier than SRP for promoting risk mitigation and more honest appraisals of BH mission-readiness levels.

Curley JM ，McDonald JL ，Nugent KL ，Clarke-Walper KM ，Penix EA ，Riviere LA ，Kim PY ，Wilk JE ... -  《-》