Nursing degree students' clinical placement experiences in Australia: A survey design.

This study aimed to evaluate Australian nursing students' views of placements at seven tertiary education institutions with the use of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET). Clinical placements are a core element of healthcare education programs around the world (Chuan and Barnett, 2012) with undergraduate nursing students required to complete a prescribed number of hours as part of their degree. The quality of nursing clinical placements varies with a range of positive and negative learning experiences. A survey design was used with a contemporary survey tool- the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET). Using Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, 2005) the on-line survey was distributed to approximately 6265 undergraduate nursing students at six Australian universities and one Technical and Further Education (TAFE) college where Bachelor of Nursing degree students were enrolled. Three Australian States were covered. Sites were selected where a project team member was employed. A total of 1263 nursing students completed the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) - 19 items (rated 1-5), one global rating (rated 1-10) - following placement in three Australian States (July 2019-February 2020). Most - 618 (48.9%) completed a placement in acute care with placements positively rated overall. The total PET mean score was 78.3% with 29.8% being 'extremely satisfied' (10 out of 10 - Item 20). However, 11.0% were dissatisfied with global ratings of four or less, whilst ratings between States differed significantly (p = <0.001). One third of respondents answered a free text statement relating to placement experiences, with significantly more comments from older students (p = <0.001) and from those with ratings in the lower range (p = <0.001). Three core themes emerged: 1. Staff Attitudes to Students, 2. Environment and 3. Lifestyle. Whilst students' clinical experiences in Australia tend to be positive a minority reported exposure to negative staff attitudes, in unsafe environments, with lifestyle detriments. Further work is required to understand and enhance student experiences.

Luders E ，Cooper S ，Cant R ，Waters D ，Tower M ，Henderson A ，Hood K ，Willetts G ，Ryan C ，Reid-Searl K ... -  《-》

Students' evaluation of professional experience placement quality in a pre-registration nursing programme: A cross-sectional survey.

Chu G ，Pitt V ，Cant R ，Johnson A ，Inder K ... -  《-》

Factors influencing nursing student satisfaction in aged care placements: An Australian cross-sectional study.

Hyun A ，Tower M ，Bogossian F ，Seib C ，Ryan C ，Cooper S ... -  《-》

Unravelling the complexities of nursing students' feedback on the clinical learning environment: a mixed methods approach.

Clinical placement is an essential part of nursing education, and students' experiences on clinical placement can affect the quality of their learning. Understanding nursing students' positive and negative perceptions of clinical placement experience is therefore important. To describe nursing students' satisfaction with their clinical placement experiences and identify any variations in satisfaction based on demographic characteristics. Mixed methods - online survey with qualitative items. Four universities in Australia. Students (n=213) enrolled in an undergraduate nursing degree. Between 2010 and 2012, students completed online surveys following their clinical placement experiences. The surveys included demographic questions and the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI-19), a 19-item tool measuring students' satisfaction with clinical placement. The surveys included two open-ended questions asking students to share their most satisfying and challenging experiences whilst on placement. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses were undertaken. Of the 213 participants, those in health-related employment and those with English as an additional language (EAL) were less satisfied with the clinical facility and with clinical facilitator support respectively, as indicated by the CLEI-19 subscale scores. Qualitative findings showed students were positive about the opportunity to make a difference and be involved in nursing, and negative about clinical facilitator support. Nevertheless, those who were most critical in their written comments about their placement were those who only spoke English at home. Although the study found overall satisfaction with clinical placement, the lower satisfaction reported by students in health-related employment, and the mixed findings regarding language spoken and satisfaction, warrant further attention.

Salamonson Y ，Everett B ，Halcomb E ，Hutchinson M ，Jackson D ，Mannix J ，Peters K ，Weaver R ... -  《-》

"This should be a compulsory placement for all nursing students": An evaluation of pre-registration nursing students' perceptions of learning on a mental health clinical placement.

To conduct a longitudinal exploration of pre-registration nursing students' perceptions of their learning on an immersive mental health clinical placement grounded in learning from people with a lived experience of mental illness (otherwise known as consumers). Enriching mental health clinical learning environments are crucial for positive mental health nursing outcomes. Though non-traditional clinical placement (i.e. non-hospital-based) models effectively increase student learning in a range of domains, little is known about the specific features of contemporary non-traditional placement settings that may be supporting student learning over time. A survey design in the form of a standardised evaluation tool with additional qualitative response questions was used to examine nursing students' perceptions of learning whilst on a non-traditional clinical placement over a 5-year period. Non-traditional placement settings are alternative placement options to traditional inpatient/community mental health settings. The TREND Statement Checklist was adhered to. Second- and third-year students studying a Bachelor of Nursing (N = 753) from eight Australian Universities completed a Student Placement Feedback Survey between 2019 and 2023. Data were collected via an evaluation survey including 7-items (rated on a 5-point agreement scale) and three free-response questions. Quantitative and qualitative responses were analysed over all observations and compared between the five years of student evaluations. Across five years, the immersive mental health placement was consistently rated by students as a highly valuable learning experience. Utilizing a Multivariate Analysis-of-variance (MANOVA) for the quantitative component revealed that student 'learning from lived experience' remained uniformly high and steady throughout 2020-2023. This was despite disrupted learning that ceased face-to-face tuition caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. An increase in 'student enthusiasm for nursing' was identified after the return to face-to-face learning. Qualitative analysis identified a greater need for preparedness prior to attending the placement and wellbeing support amongst students. Over the five years, pre-registration nursing students report clinical skill improvement and enhanced knowledge following the immersive mental health placement alongside an increased desire for further skill development. Learning from people's lived experience of mental illness and specialised facilitators was valuable for student learning outcomes. Increased support is needed for student mental health vulnerabilities and wellbeing ahead of clinical placements. Further research is recommended on the aspects of non-traditional clinical placements that may be protective for student learning.

Moxham L ，Roberts M ，Yousiph T ，Lewer K ，Jay EK ，Robson G ，Patterson C ... -  《-》