Deep Learning Estimation of 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Field Metrics Based on Thickness Maps from Macula OCT.

To develop deep learning (DL) systems estimating visual function from macula-centered spectral-domain (SD) OCT images. Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. A total of 2408 10-2 visual field (VF) SD OCT pairs and 2999 24-2 VF SD OCT pairs collected from 645 healthy and glaucoma subjects (1222 eyes). Deep learning models were trained on thickness maps from Spectralis macula SD OCT to estimate 10-2 and 24-2 VF mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Individual and combined DL models were trained using thickness data from 6 layers (retinal nerve fiber layer [RNFL], ganglion cell layer [GCL], inner plexiform layer [IPL], ganglion cell-IPL [GCIPL], ganglion cell complex [GCC] and retina). Linear regression of mean layer thicknesses were used for comparison. Deep learning models were evaluated using R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) compared with 10-2 and 24-2 VF measurements. Combined DL models estimating 10-2 achieved R2 of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.89) for MD and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.55-0.81) for PSD and MAEs of 1.9 dB (95% CI, 1.6-2.4 dB) for MD and 1.5 dB (95% CI, 1.2-1.9 dB) for PSD. This was significantly better than mean thickness estimates for 10-2 MD (0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.71] and 3.0 dB [95% CI, 2.5-3.5 dB]) and 10-2 PSD (0.46 [95% CI, 0.31-0.60] and 2.3 dB [95% CI, 1.8-2.7 dB]). Combined DL models estimating 24-2 achieved R2 of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84) for MD and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.53-0.79) for PSD and MAEs of 2.1 dB (95% CI, 1.8-2.5 dB) for MD and 1.5 dB (95% CI, 1.3-1.9 dB) for PSD. This was significantly better than mean thickness estimates for 24-2 MD (0.41 [95% CI, 0.26-0.57] and 3.4 dB [95% CI, 2.7-4.5 dB]) and 24-2 PSD (0.38 [95% CI, 0.20-0.57] and 2.4 dB [95% CI, 2.0-2.8 dB]). The GCIPL (R2 = 0.79) and GCC (R2 = 0.75) had the highest performance estimating 10-2 and 24-2 MD, respectively. Deep learning models improved estimates of functional loss from SD OCT imaging. Accurate estimates can help clinicians to individualize VF testing to patients.

Christopher M ，Bowd C ，Proudfoot JA ，Belghith A ，Goldbaum MH ，Rezapour J ，Fazio MA ，Girkin CA ，De Moraes G ，Liebmann JM ，Weinreb RN ，Zangwill LM ... -  《-》

Deep Learning Approaches Predict Glaucomatous Visual Field Damage from OCT Optic Nerve Head En Face Images and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.

To develop and evaluate a deep learning system for differentiating between eyes with and without glaucomatous visual field damage (GVFD) and predicting the severity of GFVD from spectral domain OCT (SD OCT) optic nerve head images. Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. A total of 9765 visual field (VF) SD OCT pairs collected from 1194 participants with and without GVFD (1909 eyes). Deep learning models were trained to use SD OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness maps, RNFL en face images, and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) images to identify eyes with GVFD and predict quantitative VF mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and mean VF sectoral pattern deviation (PD) from SD OCT data. Deep learning models were compared with mean RNFL thickness for identifying GVFD using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. For predicting MD, PSD, and mean sectoral PD, models were evaluated using R2 and mean absolute error (MAE). In the independent test dataset, the deep learning models based on RNFL en face images achieved an AUC of 0.88 for identifying eyes with GVFD and 0.82 for detecting mild GVFD significantly (P < 0.001) better than using mean RNFL thickness measurements (AUC = 0.82 and 0.73, respectively). Deep learning models outperformed standard RNFL thickness measurements in predicting all quantitative VF metrics. In predicting MD, deep learning models based on RNFL en face images achieved an R2 of 0.70 and MAE of 2.5 decibels (dB) compared with 0.45 and 3.7 dB for RNFL thickness measurements. In predicting mean VF sectoral PD, deep learning models achieved high accuracy in the inferior nasal (R2 = 0.60) and superior nasal (R2 = 0.67) sectors, moderate accuracy in inferior (R2 = 0.26) and superior (R2 = 0.35) sectors, and lower accuracy in the central (R2 = 0.15) and temporal (R2 = 0.12) sectors. Deep learning models had high accuracy in identifying eyes with GFVD and predicting the severity of functional loss from SD OCT images. Accurately predicting the severity of GFVD from SD OCT imaging can help clinicians more effectively individualize the frequency of VF testing to the individual patient.

Christopher M ，Bowd C ，Belghith A ，Goldbaum MH ，Weinreb RN ，Fazio MA ，Girkin CA ，Liebmann JM ，Zangwill LM ... -  《-》

Visual Field Prognosis From Macula and Circumpapillary Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Scandella D ，Gallardo M ，Kucur SS ，Sznitman R ，Unterlauft JD ... -  《Translational Vision Science & Technology》

Deep Learning Estimation of 10-2 Visual Field Map Based on Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements.

To estimate central 10-degree visual field (VF) map from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) measurements in glaucoma with artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence (convolutional neural networks) study. This study included 5352 SD-OCT scans and 10-2 VF pairs from 1365 eyes of 724 healthy patients, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed to estimate the 68 individual sensitivity thresholds of 10-2 VF map using all-sectors (CNNA) and temporal-sectors (CNNT) RNFL thickness information of the SD-OCT circle scan (768 thickness points). 10-2 indices including pointwise total deviation (TD) values, mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD) were generated using the CNN-estimated sensitivity thresholds at individual test locations. Linear regression (LR) models with the same input were used for comparison. The CNNA model achieved an average pointwise mean absolute error of 4.04 dB (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.76-4.35) and correlation coefficient (r) of 0.59 (95% CI 0.52-0.64) over 10-2 map and the mean absolute error and r of 2.88 dB (95% CI 2.63-3.15) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.80) for MD, and 2.31 dB (95% CI 2.03-2.61) and 0.59 (95% CI 0.51-0.65) for PSD estimations, respectively, significantly outperforming the LRA model. The proposed CNNA model improved the estimation of 10-2 VF map based on circumpapillary SD-OCT RNFL thickness measurements. These artificial intelligence methods using SD-OCT structural data show promise to individualize the frequency of central VF assessment in patients with glaucoma and would enable the reallocation of resources from patients at lowest risk to those at highest risk of central VF damage.

Kamalipour A ，Moghimi S ，Khosravi P ，Jazayeri MS ，Nishida T ，Mahmoudinezhad G ，Li EH ，Christopher M ，Liebmann JM ，Fazio MA ，Girkin CA ，Zangwill L ，Weinreb RN ... -  《-》

Deep learning model to predict visual field in central 10° from optical coherence tomography measurement in glaucoma.

To train and validate the prediction performance of the deep learning (DL) model to predict visual field (VF) in central 10° from spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). This multicentre, cross-sectional study included paired Humphrey field analyser (HFA) 10-2 VF and SD-OCT measurements from 591 eyes of 347 patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or normal subjects for the training data set. We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) for predicting VF threshold (TH) sensitivity values from the thickness of the three macular layers: retinal nerve fibre layer, ganglion cell layer+inner plexiform layer and outer segment+retinal pigment epithelium. We implemented pattern-based regularisation on top of CNN to avoid overfitting. Using an external testing data set of 160 eyes of 131 patients with OAG, the prediction performance (absolute error (AE) and R2 between predicted and actual TH values) was calculated for (1) mean TH in whole VF and (2) each TH of 68 points. For comparison, we trained support vector machine (SVM) and multiple linear regression (MLR). AE of whole VF with CNN was 2.84±2.98 (mean±SD) dB, significantly smaller than those with SVM (5.65±5.12 dB) and MLR (6.96±5.38 dB) (all, p<0.001). Mean of point-wise mean AE with CNN was 5.47±3.05 dB, significantly smaller than those with SVM (7.96±4.63 dB) and MLR (11.71±4.15 dB) (all, p<0.001). R2 with CNN was 0.74 for the mean TH of whole VF, and 0.44±0.24 for the overall 68 points. DL model showed considerably accurate prediction of HFA 10-2 VF from SD-OCT.

Hashimoto Y ，Asaoka R ，Kiwaki T ，Sugiura H ，Asano S ，Murata H ，Fujino Y ，Matsuura M ，Miki A ，Mori K ，Ikeda Y ，Kanamoto T ，Yamagami J ，Inoue K ，Tanito M ，Yamanishi K ... -  《-》