The Effect of Saffron Consumption on Liver Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

The present systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aimed to determine the effects of saffron supplementation on liver function tests among adults. Electronic databases including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to January 2021. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The overall estimates and their 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects models. Egger's test and Begg's rank-correlation were run to assess the presence of publication bias. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 12 trials involving 608 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Saffron supplementation had no significant effect on liver function tests including aspartate transaminase (AST) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.23 U/L; 95% CI -2.22 to 2.69; p = 0.851; I2 = 74.0%), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (WMD = -1.49 U/L; 95% CI -3.84 to 0.86; p = 0.213; I2 = 60.2%), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (WMD = -0.70 U/L; 95% CI -11.35 to 9.95; p = 0.898; I2 = 40.8%) compared to placebo. Based on what was discussed, it seems that saffron supplementation could not improve liver function tests including AST, ALT, and ALP among the adult population. Further clinical trials with larger sample size, longer duration, and higher doses of saffron should be conducted exclusively among patients with liver dysfunction to elucidate the beneficial role of saffron consumption on liver function.

Karimi E ，Farrokhzad A ，Darand M ，Arab A ... -  《-》

Does saffron supplementation have favorable effects on liver function indicators? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mousavi SM ，Mokhtari P ，Asbaghi O ，Rigi S ，Persad E ，Jayedi A ，Rezvani H ，Mahamat-Saleh Y ，Sadeghi O ... -  《-》

Effect of saffron supplementation on liver enzymes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Possible protective effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L) have been reported in several randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Current systematic review was performed to summarize the efficacy of saffron intake on liver enzymes. An electronic database search was conducted on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane for RCTs comparing effect of saffron and placebo on liver enzymes from inception to July 2021. There was no restriction in language of included studies and we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for each variable. Random-effect model was used to calculate effect size. Eight studies (n = 463 participants) were included in the systematic review. The saffron intake was associated with a statistically significant decrease in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (SMD: -0.18; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.02; I2 = 0%) in comparison to placebo intake. Our results also indicated that saffron consumption did not have a significant effect on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (SMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.36, 0.09; I2 = 47.0%) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels (SMD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.18, 0.46; I2 = 42.9%) compared to placebo. Saffron intake showed beneficial impacts on circulating AST levels. However, larger well-designed RCTs are still needed to clarify the effect of saffron intake on these and other liver enzymes.

Hasani M ，Malekahmadi M ，Rezamand G ，Estêvão MD ，Pizarro AB ，Heydari H ，Hoong WC ，Arafah OA ，Barakeh ARR ，Rahman A ，Alrashidi MSK ，Abu-Zaid A ... -  《-》

The effect of Nigella sativa on the measures of liver and kidney parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

The aim of this systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis was to determine the effect of Nigella sativa (N.S) supplementation on liver and kidney parameters. We searched PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane central register for controlled trials and Google Scholar from database inception to April 2019 for relevant controlled trials. Mean differences and standard deviations for each outcome were pooled using a random-effects model and a dose-response analysis was performed using a fractional polynomial model. Quality of evidence was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Nineteen trials (n = 1295 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. We observed that N.S supplements had significant reducing effects on alkaline-phosphatase (ALP) [9 trials, n = 710 participants, weighted mean difference (WMD)= -10.825; 95 %CI: -19.658, -1.992 U/L; P = 0.016; I2 = 75.7 %; P-heterogeneity = 0.000) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (12 trials, n = 821 participants, WMD= -1.016; 95 % CI: -1.760, -0.273 U/L; P = 0.007; I2 = 87.7 %; P-heterogeneity = 0.000) concentrations. Subgroup analysis showed that, an intervention of more than 12 weeks was found to have a reducing effect on aspartate- aminotransferase (AST) measures (2 trials, n = 201 participants, WMD= -11.317; 95 % CI: -15.007, -7.626; P = 0.000; I2 = 0.0 %; P-heterogeneity = 0.977). Creatinine levels increased significantly in studies that considered adjusted analysis based on covariates (3 trials, n = 152 participants, WMD = 0.070; 95 % CI: 0.027, 0.112 U/L; P = 0.001; I2 = 0.0 %; P-heterogeneity = 0.788). A daily dose of 1100-1500 mg of N.S supplements was observed to have a substantial reducing effect on ALP levels (5 trials, n = 340 participants, WMD= -11.323; 95 % CI: -21.418, -1.229 U/L; P = 0.028; I2 = 0.00 %; P-heterogeneity = 0.686), while a dosage of more than 2000 mg per day led to a significant increase in BUN concentrations (2 trials, n = 101 participants, WMD= -1.016; 95 % CI: -1.760, -0.273 U/L; P = 0.007; I2 = 87.7 %; P-heterogeneity = 0.000). Our data suggested that N.S supplementation had significant impacts on liver and kidney parameters leading to a decrease in ALP and BUN levels. Longer duration of intervention and normal daily dosages of N.S supplements led to significant reductions in ALP and AST concentrations, respectively, while higher daily dosages increased BUN levels. Hence, in spite of favorable impacts of N.S supplements on liver and kidney parameters, due to the herbal nature of N.S, more studies with high-quality, large-scale, long-term intervention and precise baseline characteristics are needed to assess the exact effective dose, duration and efficacy of N.S supplementation on kidney and liver parameters.

Razmpoosh E ，Safi S ，Abdollahi N ，Nadjarzadeh A ，Nazari M ，Fallahzadeh H ，Mazaheri M ，Salehi-Abargouei A ... -  《-》

The Effect of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) Supplementation on Renal Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.

The present systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at determining the effect of saffron supplementation on renal function. Electronic databases were searched up to February 2021. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The overall weighted mean difference (WMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 11 trials were included in this study. Saffron had beneficial effect on BUN (WMD = -0.69 mg/dl; 95% CI, -1.36 to -0.01; P=0.046) compared to placebo, with significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 49.6%, P=0.037). However, it had no significant effect on serum Cr (WMD = 0.04 mg/dl; 95% CI: -0.01 to 0.09; P=0.127). It seems that saffron supplementation had no significant effect on Cr as a renal function factor. However, BUN reduction was significant in the saffron group compared to placebo.

Karimi E ，Shahdadian F ，Hadi A ，Tarrahi MA ，Tarrahi MJ ... -  《-》