Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law.

We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from a single angiographic view in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. Computation of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) from a single angiographic view might increase the feasibility of routine use of computational FFR. In addition, current QFR solutions assume a linear tapering of the reference vessel size, which might decrease the diagnostic accuracy in the presence of the physiologically significant bifurcation lesions. An artificial intelligence algorithm was proposed for automatic delineation of lumen contours of major epicardial coronary arteries including their side branches. A step-down reference diameter function was reconstructed based on the Murray bifurcation fractal law and used for QFR computation. Validation of this Murray law-based QFR (μQFR) was performed on the FAVOR II China study population. The μQFR was computed separately in two angiographic projections, starting with the one with optimal angiographic image quality. Hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis was defined by pressure wire-derived FFR ≤0.80. The μQFR was successfully computed in all 330 vessels of 306 patients. There was excellent correlation (r = 0.90, p < .001) and agreement (mean difference = 0.00 ± 0.05, p = .378) between μQFR and FFR. The vessel-level diagnostic accuracy for μQFR to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis was 93.0% (95% CI: 90.3 to 95.8%), with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 87.5% (95% CI: 80.2 to 92.8%), 96.2% (95% CI: 92.6 to 98.3%), 92.9% (95% CI: 86.5 to 96.9%), 93.1% (95% CI: 88.9 to 96.1%), 23.0 (95% CI: 11.6 to 45.5), 0.13 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.20), respectively. Use of suboptimal angiographic image view slightly decreased the diagnostic accuracy of μQFR (AUC = 0.97 versus 0.92, difference = 0.05, p < .001). Intra- and inter-observer variability for μQFR computation was 0.00 ± 0.03, and 0.00 ± 0.03, respectively. Average analysis time for μQFR was 67 ± 22 s. Computation of μQFR from a single angiographic view has high feasibility and excellent diagnostic accuracy in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. The short analysis time and good reproducibility of μQFR bear potential of wider adoption of physiological assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Tu S ，Ding D ，Chang Y ，Li C ，Wijns W ，Xu B ... -  《-》

Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CTA)-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR), namely CT-QFR, and compare it with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-based Murray law QFR (μQFR), using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. Patients who underwent coronary CTA, ICA and pressure wire-based FFR assessment within two months were retrospectively analyzed. CT-QFR and μQFR were computed in blinded fashion and compared with FFR, all applying the same cut-off value of ≤0.80 to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis. Paired comparison between CT-QFR and μQFR was performed in 191 vessels from 167 patients. Average FFR was 0.81 ​± ​0.10 and 42.4% vessels had an FFR ≤0.80. CT-QFR had a slightly lower correlation with FFR compared with μQFR, although statistically non-significant (r ​= ​0.87 versus 0.90, p ​= ​0.110). The vessel-level diagnostic performance of CT-QFR was slightly lower but without statistical significance than μQFR (AUC ​= ​0.94 versus 0.97, difference: -0.03 [95%CI: -0.00-0.06], p ​= ​0.095), and substantially higher than diameter stenosis by CTA (AUC difference: 0.17 [95%CI: -0.10-0.23], p ​< ​0.001). The patient-level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio for CT-QFR to identify FFR value ​≤ ​0.80 was 88%, 90%, 86%, 86%, 91%, 6.59 and 0.12, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR was 84% in extensively calcified lesions, while in vessels with no or less calcification, CT-QFR showed a comparable diagnostic accuracy with μQFR (91% versus 92%, p ​= ​0.595). Intra- and inter-observer variability in CT-QFR analysis was -0.00 ​± ​0.04 and 0.00 ​± ​0.04, respectively. Performance in diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis by CT-QFR was slightly lower but without statistical significance than μQFR, and substantially higher than CTA-derived diameter stenosis. Extensively calcified lesions reduced the diagnostic accuracy of CT-QFR.

Li Z ，Li G ，Chen L ，Ding D ，Chen Y ，Zhang J ，Xu L ，Kubo T ，Zhang S ，Wang Y ，Zhou X ，Tu S ... -  《-》

Quantitative Flow Ratio Based on Murray Fractal Law: Accuracy of Single Versus Two Angiographic Views.

Murray bifurcation fractal law-based quantitative flow ratio (QFR), namely, μQFR, is a novel method for the fast computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from a single angiographic view. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of computational QFR based on single vs 2 angiographic views in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. The algorithm of μQFR was extended to develop a Murray law-based 3-dimensional (3D) μQFR from 2 angiographic projections. Patients with both angiographic views acquired according to the protocol-specified recommended views in the FAVOR (Functional Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis) II China study were included. μQFR was computed separately from the first (μQFR1) and second (μQFR2) angiographic projections, whereas the 3D-μQFR was computed based on both projections, all blinded to FFR data. Hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis was defined by wire-based FFR of ≤0.80. Altogether, 280 vessels from 262 patients had 2 protocol-specified recommended angiographic views; μQFR1, μQFR2, and 3D-μQFR were successfully computed in all these vessels. The mean FFR was 0.82 ± 0.12. The vessel-level diagnostic accuracy for μQFR1, μQFR2, and 3D-μQFR to identify hemodynamically significant stenosis was 92.1% (95% CI, 89.0%-95.3%), 92.5% (95% CI, 89.4%-95.6%), and 93.2% (95% CI, 90.3%-96.2%), respectively, with similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for μQFR1 (0.96, P < .001), μQFR2 (0.95, P < .001), and 3D-μQFR (0.95, P < .001). μQFR1 and μQFR2 had excellent correlation (r = 0.95) and agreement (mean difference = 0.00 ± 0.03). Computation of μQFR from a single angiographic view had comparably good diagnostic performance as 2-view 3D-μQFR in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.

Ding D ，Tu S ，Chang Y ，Li C ，Xu B ，Wijns W ... -  《-》

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Complex Coronary Lesions.

Wu X ，Wang K ，Li G ，Wu J ，Jiang J ，Gao F ，Zhu L ，Xu Q ，Wang X ，Xu M ，Chen H ，Ma L ，Han X ，Luo N ，Tu S ，Wang J ，Hu X ... -  《-》

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.

The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to identify the optimal approach for simple and fast fractional flow reserve (FFR) computation from radiographic coronary angiography, called quantitative flow ratio (QFR). A novel, rapid computation of QFR pullbacks from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography was developed recently. QFR was derived from 3 flow models with: 1) fixed empiric hyperemic flow velocity (fixed-flow QFR [fQFR]); 2) modeled hyperemic flow velocity derived from angiography without drug-induced hyperemia (contrast-flow QFR [cQFR]); and 3) measured hyperemic flow velocity derived from angiography during adenosine-induced hyperemia (adenosine-flow QFR [aQFR]). Pressure wire-derived FFR, measured during maximal hyperemia, served as the reference. Separate independent core laboratories analyzed angiographic images and pressure tracings from 8 centers in 7 countries. The QFR and FFR from 84 vessels in 73 patients with intermediate coronary lesions were compared. Mean angiographic percent diameter stenosis (DS%) was 46.1 ± 8.9%; 27 vessels (32%) had FFR ≤ 0.80. Good agreement with FFR was observed for fQFR, cQFR, and aQFR, with mean differences of 0.003 ± 0.068 (p = 0.66), 0.001 ± 0.059 (p = 0.90), and -0.001 ± 0.065 (p = 0.90), respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy for identifying an FFR of ≤0.80 was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71% to 89%), 86% (95% CI: 78% to 93%), and 87% (95% CI: 80% to 94%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was higher for cQFR than fQFR (difference: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.08; p < 0.01), but did not differ significantly between cQFR and aQFR (difference: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.06; p = 0.65). Compared with DS%, both cQFR and aQFR increased the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve by 0.20 (p < 0.01) and 0.19 (p < 0.01). The positive likelihood ratio was 4.8, 8.4, and 8.9 for fQFR, cQFR, and aQFR, with negative likelihood ratio of 0.4, 0.3, and 0.2, respectively. The QFR computation improved the diagnostic accuracy of 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography-based identification of stenosis significance. The favorable results of cQFR that does not require pharmacologic hyperemia induction bears the potential of a wider adoption of FFR-based lesion assessment through a reduction in procedure time, risk, and costs.

Tu S ，Westra J ，Yang J ，von Birgelen C ，Ferrara A ，Pellicano M ，Nef H ，Tebaldi M ，Murasato Y ，Lansky A ，Barbato E ，van der Heijden LC ，Reiber JHC ，Holm NR ，Wijns W ，FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group ... -  《-》