Evaluating the maternal and perinatal sequelae of severe gestational hypertension.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are widespread and have long-standing implications for women's health. Historically, the management of "severe gestational hypertension," or the presence of severely elevated blood pressures without any other signs or symptoms of end-organ damage meeting the criteria for preeclampsia, has been unclear. The new American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines based on expert opinion recommend that severe gestational hypertension be treated similarly to preeclampsia with severe features, but data regarding outcomes for women with this diagnosis have been limited. This study aimed to compare the maternal and perinatal sequelae of severe gestational hypertension with that of other types of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. This is a retrospective cohort study of women with hypertensive disease of pregnancy who delivered at a single tertiary care center between February and December 2018. Women with chronic hypertension; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome; preexisting kidney, liver, rheumatologic, or hematologic disorders; or multifetal pregnancies were excluded. Women were categorized as having severe gestational hypertension if they had a sustained systolic blood pressure of >160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of >110 mm Hg without other criteria for preeclampsia. The primary comparison was between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features. Secondary comparisons included women with severe gestational hypertension vs women with other types of hypertensive disease of pregnancy. The primary outcome for this analysis was small-for-gestational-age birth. We also evaluated other maternal and neonatal morbidities including but not limited to pulmonary embolism, stroke, eclampsia, blood transfusion, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, death, 5-minute Apgar score of ≤4, umbilical cord pH, neonatal intensive care unit admission of >2 days, respiratory distress syndrome, and neonatal death. Bivariate analyses using chi-square tests and logistic regressions adjusting for race, ethnicity, age, body mass index, parity, and insurance status were performed to compare frequencies of outcomes for each type of hypertensive disease of pregnancy with those of severe gestational hypertension. Of 2076 women eligible for inclusion, 12.2% (n=254) had severe gestational hypertension and 379 (18.2%) had preeclampsia without severe features. Although there was no difference in the odds of small-for-gestational-age birth between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features (14.7% vs 9.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.21), the latter were significantly less likely to receive a prescription for antihypertensive medication at discharge (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.22) or to be readmitted postpartum (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.50). There was no difference in the primary outcome, that is, rate of small-for-gestational-age birth, between women with severe gestational hypertension and women with preeclampsia without severe features. However, women with severe gestational hypertension had greater odds of other maternal and neonatal morbidities than women with preeclampsia without severe features or mild gestational hypertension. These findings support recent recommendations regarding the management of women with severe gestational hypertension.

Kumar NR ，Grobman WA ，Barry O ，Clement AC ，Lancki N ，Yee LM ... -  《-》

Perinatal outcomes in women with elevated blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension.

Hypertension was redefined in 2017 with lower diagnostic thresholds; elevated blood pressure is defined as systolic blood pressure of 120 to 129 mm Hg with diastolic blood pressure of <80 mm Hg and stage 1 hypertension as systolic blood pressure of 130 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of 80 to 89 mm Hg. These guidelines did not include pregnant women. There is limited information on stage 1 hypertension and pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to determine whether elevated blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension as newly defined by the 2017 American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association guidelines are associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, 18,801 women with singletons from 2013 to 2019 were categorized as normotensive, prehypertensive (elevated blood pressure), stage 1 hypertensive, or chronic hypertensive. Women with ≥2 systolic blood pressures of 120 to 129 mm Hg before 20 weeks' gestation were classified into the elevated blood pressure group. Women with ≥2 systolic blood pressures of 130 to 139 mm Hg or ≥2 diastolic blood pressures of 80 to 89 mm Hg before 20 weeks' gestation were assigned to the stage 1 hypertension group. Women were classified as chronic hypertensives if they had any of the following: ≥2 systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg or ≥2 diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg before 20 weeks' gestation, a history of chronic hypertension, or antihypertensive medication use before 20 weeks' gestation. Women with pregestational diabetes, lupus, or <2 blood pressures before 20 weeks' gestation were excluded. The association of stage 1 hypertension with the risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was estimated using multivariate logistic regression controlling for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, gestational weight gain by prepregnancy body mass index, parity, and aspirin use. Secondary outcomes included subgroups of hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia, and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome), gestational diabetes, placental abruption, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, stillbirth and neonatal death, and maternal intensive care unit admission. All outcomes were adjusted for potential confounders. Of the 18,801 women, 13,478 (71.7%) were normotensive, 2659 (14.1%) had elevated blood pressure, 1384 (7.4%) were stage 1 hypertensive, and 1280 (6.8%) were chronic hypertensive. A dose-response relationship was observed: the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increased from 4.2% in normotensive women to 6.7% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.79) in women with elevated blood pressure, to 10.9% (adjusted odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-3.08) in women with stage 1 hypertension, and 28.4% (adjusted odds ratio, 7.14; 95% confidence interval, 6.06-8.40) in women with chronic hypertension. Compared with normotensive women, women with stage 1 hypertension had an increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admissions (15.8% vs 13.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.42), preterm birth at <37 weeks' gestation (7.2% vs 5.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.81), and gestational diabetes (14.8% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 2.27-3.17). Our study demonstrates that elevated blood pressure and stage 1 hypertension, using the 2017 American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association guideline definition, are associated with increased maternal and neonatal risk. This group of women warrants further investigation to determine whether pregnancy management can be altered to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Greenberg VR ，Silasi M ，Lundsberg LS ，Culhane JF ，Reddy UM ，Partridge C ，Lipkind HS ... -  《-》

The impact of the definition of preeclampsia on disease diagnosis and outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

The diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia have evolved from the traditional definition of de novo hypertension and proteinuria to a broader definition of hypertension with evidence of end-organ dysfunction. Although this change is endorsed by various societies such as the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, there remains controversy with regard to the implementation of broader definitions and the most appropriate definition of end-organ dysfunction. This study aimed to assess the impact of different diagnostic criteria for preeclampsia on rates of disease diagnosis, disease severity, and adverse outcomes and to identify associations between each component of the different diagnostic criteria and adverse pregnancy outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies at Monash Health between January 1, 2016 and July 31, 2018. Within this population, all cases of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia were reclassified according to the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2001, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018, and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 criteria. Differences in incidence of preeclampsia and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2001 group and the extra cases identified by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018 and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018. Outcomes assessed included biochemical markers of preeclampsia, a composite of adverse maternal outcomes, and a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes. Multiple logistic regression analysis was also performed to assess each component of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018 and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 criteria and their associations with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Of 22,094 pregnancies, 751 (3.4%) women had preeclampsia as defined by any of the 3 criteria. Compared with International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2001, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018 criteria identified an extra 42 women (n=654 vs n=696, 6.4% relative increase) with preeclampsia, and International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 identified an extra 97 women (n=654 vs n=751, 14.8% relative increase). The additional women identified by International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy 2018 exhibited a milder form of disease with lower rates of severe hypertension (62.4% vs 44.3%; P<.01) and magnesium sulfate use (11.9% vs 4.1%; P<.05) and a trend toward lower rates of adverse maternal outcomes (9.8% vs 4.1%). These women also delivered at a later gestation, and their babies had a lower number of neonatal intensive care unit admissions and adverse perinatal outcomes. Objective features such as fetal growth restriction, thrombocytopenia, renal and liver impairment, and proteinuria were associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes, whereas subjective neurologic features demonstrated poorer associations. Implementation of broader definitions of preeclampsia will result in an increased incidence of disease diagnosis. However, because women who exclusively fulfill the new criteria have a milder phenotype of the disease, it remains uncertain whether this will translate to improved outcomes.

Reddy M ，Fenn S ，Rolnik DL ，Mol BW ，da Silva Costa F ，Wallace EM ，Palmer KR ... -  《-》

Effectiveness of extended postpartum inpatient monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to reduce the risk of readmission for preeclampsia with severe features.

Preeclampsia is an obstetrical disorder, which complicates 3% to 6% of pregnancies and contributes to 21.6% of readmissions in the postpartum period. The optimal strategy for inpatient monitoring of blood pressures to minimize readmissions for postpartum patients with hypertensive disorders is not known. We hypothesized that extended monitoring of postpartum patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for at least 36 hours after the last blood pressure that was ≥150/100 mm Hg would result in decreased readmission rates for preeclampsia with severe features compared with those who were not observed by these blood pressure goals. This study aimed to evaluate whether extended inpatient monitoring of postpartum patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for at least 36 hours after their last blood pressure that was ≥150/100 mm Hg would improve readmission rates for preeclampsia with severe features within 6 weeks of delivery. This was a retrospective cohort study in patients with a singleton pregnancy and a diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy at their delivery admission or at any point during pregnancy who delivered 1 year before and 1 year after the implementation of extended inpatient monitoring of postpartum hypertension. The primary outcome was readmission for preeclampsia with severe features within 6 weeks of delivery. The secondary outcomes were length of stay during first admission, number of readmissions for any indication, intensive care unit admission, postpartum day at readmission, median systolic blood pressure in the 24-hour period before discharge, median diastolic blood pressure in the 24-hour period before discharge, intravenous antihypertensive medication required during first admission, and intravenous antihypertensive medication required during second admission. Univariable analysis was performed for the association between baseline maternal characteristics and the primary outcome. Multivariable analysis was performed, adjusting for baseline maternal characteristic differences between exposure groups. A total of 567 patients met the inclusion criteria of which 248 patients delivered before and 319 delivered after the implementation of extended monitoring. For baseline characteristics, the extended monitoring group had a significantly higher proportion of patients who were non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic, more diagnoses of hypertensive disorders and/or diabetes mellitus at the time of admission for delivery, a difference in the distribution of hypertensive diagnoses at the time of discharge from the first admission, and fewer discharged patients from their first admission on labetalol than the preintervention group. In a univariable analysis of the primary outcome, there was a significantly increased risk of readmission for preeclampsia with severe features in the extended monitoring group (62.5% vs 96.2% of total readmissions; P=.004). In multivariable analysis, patients in the extended monitoring group were more likely to be readmitted for preeclampsia with severe features than patients in the preintervention group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-11.5; P=.044). Extended monitoring with a strict blood pressure goal of <150/<100 mm Hg did not decrease readmissions for preeclampsia with severe features in patients with a previous diagnosis of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.

Bronner BA ，Trowbridge PL ，Perry AC ，McCormick AC ，Waters TP ，de Los Reyes S ... -  《-》

Quantifying the additional maternal morbidity in women with preeclampsia with severe features in whom immediate delivery is recommended.

Preeclampsia with severe features when diagnosed at less than 34 weeks is associated with maternal morbidity and is managed by immediate delivery or inpatient expectant management. This study aimed to compare maternal morbidity in women with preeclampsia with severe features in whom the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends immediate delivery versus those eligible for expectant management. This was a retrospective cohort study of women with preeclampsia with severe features delivered between 23 to 34 weeks of gestation from 2013 to 2017 at a single tertiary center. Women were categorized into 2 groups: (1) those recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for immediate delivery, that is, ineligible for expectant management, and (2) those eligible for expectant management. The primary outcome was composite postpartum maternal morbidity, which included maternal intensive care unit admission, stroke, death, and other severe morbidities. The secondary outcomes included select adverse perinatal outcomes. Groups were compared and adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) calculated. Of the 1172 women with preeclampsia identified during the study period, 543 with preeclampsia with severe features were included for analysis: 211 (39%) were ineligible for expectant management and 332 (61%) were eligible for expectant management. Baseline characteristics, including age, body mass index, race and ethnicity, parity, marital status, and gestational age at preeclampsia diagnosis, were similar between the 2 groups. Women ineligible for expectant management had significantly higher composite postpartum maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 5.02 [95% confidence interval, 1.35-18.69]). In addition, those ineligible for expectant management were more likely to have postpartum intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 4.19 [95% confidence interval, 1.09-16.16]) and postpartum hemoglobin level of <7 g/dL (adjusted odds ratio, 5.07 [95% confidence interval, 1.35-19.08]). There was no demonstrable difference in neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups. Women with preeclampsia with severe features who were ineligible for expectant management per the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines had a 5-fold increased risk of maternal morbidity, confirming the need for escalation of care and delivery without delay.

Jaber S ，Jauk VC ，Cozzi GD ，Sanjanwala AR ，Becker DA ，Harper LM ，Casey BM ，Sinkey RG ，Subramaniam A ... -  《-》