Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy according to gestational age at diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The association between the most severe types of placenta accreta spectrum disorders and caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) poses the question of whether early diagnosis may impact the clinical outcome of these anomalies. The aim of this study is to report the outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) diagnosed in the early (≤9 weeks) versus late (>9 weeks) first trimester of pregnancy. Medline, Embase and Clinicaltrail.gov databases were searched. Studies including cases of CSP with an early (≤9 weeks of gestation) compared to a late (>9 weeks) first trimester diagnosis of CSP, followed by immediate treatment, were included in this systematic review. The primary outcome was a composite measure of severe maternal morbidity including either severe first trimester bleeding, need for blood transfusion, uterine rupture or emergency hysterectomy. The secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome. Random-effect meta-analyses were used to combine data. Thirty-six studies (724 women with CSP) were included. Overall, composite adverse outcome complicated 5.9 % (95 % CI 3.5-9.0) of CSP diagnosed ≤9 weeks and 32.4 % (95 % CI 15.7-51.8) of those diagnosed >9 weeks. Massive hemorrhage occurred in 4.3 % (95 % CI 2.3-7.0) of women with early and in 28.0 % (95 % CI 14.1-44.5) of those with late first trimester diagnosis of CSP, while the corresponding figures for the need for blood transfusion were 1.5 % (95 % CI 0.6-2.8) and 15.8 % (95 % CI 5.5-30.2) respectively. Uterine rupture occurred in 2.5 % (95 % CI 1.2-4.1) of women with a prenatal diagnosis of CSP ≤ 9 weeks and in 7.5 % (95 % CI 2.5-14.9) of those with CSP > 9 weeks, while an emergency intervention involving hysterectomy was required in 3.7 % (95 % CI 2.2-5.4) and 16.3 % (95 % CI5.9-30.6) respectively. When computing the risk, early diagnosis of CSP was associated with a significantly lower risk of composite adverse outcome, (OR: 0.14; 95 % CI 0.1-0.4 p < 0.001). Early first trimester diagnosis of CSP is associated with a significantly lower risk of maternal complications, thus supporting a policy of universal screening for these anomalies in women with a prior cesarean delivery although the cost-effectiveness of such policy should be tested in future studies.

Timor-Tritsch I ，Buca D ，Di Mascio D ，Cali G ，D'Amico A ，Monteagudo A ，Tinari S ，Morlando M ，Nappi L ，Greco P ，Rizzo G ，Liberati M ，Jose-Palacios-Jaraquemada ，D'Antonio F ... -  《-》

Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis.

To explore the outcome in women managed expectantly following the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed utilizing combinations of relevant medical subject headings for 'Cesarean scar pregnancy' and 'outcome'. Reference lists of relevant articles and reviews were hand-searched for additional reports. Observed outcomes included: severe first-trimester vaginal bleeding; clinical symptoms (abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding) requiring treatment; uncomplicated miscarriage; complicated miscarriage requiring intervention; first- or second-trimester uterine rupture or hysterectomy; third-trimester bleeding, uterine rupture or hysterectomy; maternal death; incidence of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP); prevalence of placenta percreta; ultrasound signs suggestive of AIP; and live birth. Meta-analyses of proportions using a random-effects model were used to combine data. Cases were stratified based on the presence or absence of embryonic/fetal heart activity at the time of diagnosis. A total of 17 studies (69 cases of CSP managed expectantly, 52 with and 17 without embryonic/fetal heart beat) were included. In women with CSP and embryonic/fetal heart activity, 13.0% (95% CI, 3.8-26.7%) experienced an uncomplicated miscarriage, while 20.0% (95% CI, 7.1-37.4%) required medical intervention. Uterine rupture during the first or second trimester of pregnancy occurred in 9.9% (95% CI, 2.9-20.4%) of cases, while hysterectomy was required in 15.2% (95% CI, 3.6-32.8%) of all cases. Forty (76.9% (95% CI, 65.4-86.5%)) women progressed to the third trimester of pregnancy, of whom 39.2% (95% CI, 15.4-66.2%) experienced severe bleeding. Finally, 74.8% (95% CI, 52.0-92.1%) had a surgical or pathological diagnosis of AIP at delivery and around two-thirds (69.7% (95% CI, 42.8-90.1%)) of them had placenta percreta. In women with CSP but no embryonic/fetal cardiac activity, an uncomplicated miscarriage occurred in 69.1% (95% CI, 47.4-87.1%) of cases, while surgical or medical intervention during or immediately after miscarriage was required in 30.9% (95% CI, 12.9-52.6%). Uterine rupture during the first trimester of pregnancy occurred in 13.4% (95% CI, 2.7-30.3%) of cases, but hysterectomy was not required in any case. CSP with positive embryonic/fetal heart activity managed expectantly is associated with a high burden of maternal morbidity including severe hemorrhage, early uterine rupture, hysterectomy and severe AIP. Despite this, a significant proportion of pregnancies complicated by CSP may progress to, or close to, term, thus questioning whether termination of pregnancy should be the only therapeutic option offered to these women. Expectant management of CSP with no cardiac activity may be a reasonable option in view of the low likelihood of maternal complications requiring intervention, although close surveillance is advisable to avoid adverse maternal outcome. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Calì G ，Timor-Tritsch IE ，Palacios-Jaraquemada J ，Monteaugudo A ，Buca D ，Forlani F ，Familiari A ，Scambia G ，Acharya G ，D'Antonio F ... -  《-》

Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To evaluate subsequent reproductive among women with a prior cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). MEDLINE, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were women with a prior CSP, defined as the gestational sac or trophoblast within the dehiscence/niche of the previous cesarean section scar or implanted on top of it. The primary outcome was the recurrence of CSP; secondary outcomes were the chance of achieving a pregnancy after CSP, miscarriage, preterm birth, uterine rupture and the occurrence of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Subgroup analysis according to the management of CSP (surgical vs non-surgical) was also performed. Random effect meta-analyses of proportions were used to analyze the data. Forty-four studies (3598 women with CSP) were included. CSP recurred in 17.6% of women. Miscarriage, preterm birth and placenta accreta spectrum disorders complicated 19.1% (65/341), 10.3% (25/243) and 4.0% of pregnancies, and 67.0% were uncomplicated. When stratifying the analysis according to the type of management, CSP recurred in 21% of women undergoing surgical and in 15.2% of those undergoing non-surgical management. Placenta accreta spectrum disorders complicated 4.0% and 12.0% of cases, respectively. Women with a prior CSP are at high risk of recurrence, miscarriage, preterm birth and placenta accreta spectrum. There is still insufficient evidence to elucidate whether the type of management adopted (surgical vs non-surgical) can impact reproductive outcome after CSP. Further large, prospective studies sharing an objective protocol of prenatal management and long-term follow up are needed to establish the optimal management of CSP and to elucidate whether it may affect its risk of recurrence and pregnancy outcome in subsequent gestations.

Morlando M ，Buca D ，Timor-Tritsch I ，Cali G ，Palacios-Jaraquemada J ，Monteagudo A ，Khalil A ，Cennamo C ，La Manna V ，Liberati M ，D'Amico A ，Nappi L ，Colacurci N ，D'Antonio F ... -  《-》

Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.

To assess the reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) in our center and review of published literature on CSP and subsequent reproductive issues. Over a 3-year period, 28 cases of CSPs were diagnosed in our hospital. Follow up data of 22 cases were available which included the gestational age at diagnosis of CSP, treatments employed and outcomes of previous cesarean scar pregnancy. We also had details on subsequent fertility outcomes in these women, which included intervals between the previous CSP and subsequent pregnancy, maternal and neonatal outcomes of these subsequent pregnancies and mode of delivery. Eight women desired to conceive and amongst them, seven women manage to conceive spontaneously. There were five pregnancies delivered at term, two miscarriages and one recurrent CSP. One patient had placenta accreta diagnosed at cesarean section at term and had massive hemorrhage. The remaining 4 term pregnancies were delivered uneventfully by elective cesarean sections. The mean interval between the cesarean scar pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy was 24.6 months (range 9-48 months). One patient experienced secondary infertility and despite thorough investigations, no abnormalities were detected. One of the women who did not desire future fertility conceived spontaneously at 9 and 18 months respectively after one CSP and had induced abortions twice. There were 3 women who had uterine scar defect repaired, only 1 resulted in a live birth but had placenta accreta with a lower uterine segment defect and suffered from massive hemorrhage, one woman had a subsequent miscarriage with a diverticulum in the lower uterine segment, and one woman had unexplained secondary infertility. Most women were able to conceive following CSPs. Reproductive outcomes included normal intrauterine term pregnancy, miscarriage, recurrent CSP, and infertility. Placenta accreta, which could be misdiagnosed antenatally, was a serious complication in subsequent pregnancies. Diverticulum or defect in the lower uterine segment could happen after CSP. Repair of the uterine defect, following a CSP neither guaranteed the healing of the scar, nor the ability to ensure a safe pregnancy outcome. Appropriate counseling to women desiring fertility with a history of CSP is essential and once they conceive early referral to tertiary centers for follow up is pertinent.

Gao L ，Huang Z ，Zhang X ，Zhou N ，Huang X ，Wang X ... -  《-》

Lower uterine segment scar assessment at 11-14 weeks' gestation to screen for placenta accreta spectrum in women with prior Cesarean delivery.

To validate prospectively transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the lower uterine segment (LUS) scar at the time of first-trimester screening in women with previous Cesarean section (CS) and to determine its feasibility and accuracy in stratifying women according to the risk for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder. Women with a history of CS were recruited between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks' gestation and underwent LUS scar assessment using transvaginal ultrasound. A standardized midsagittal plane, which included the cervicoisthmic canal (CIC), the uterine scar and the placental site, was obtained. The scar was described in terms of its size (narrow or dehiscent) and its location in relation to the CIC (within or above), with each LUS scar classified into one of four groups based on these features. Placental location was assessed and classified as high- or low-lying. Women were stratified according to the risk of PAS, based on the relationship between the scar location and placental site. Women were considered high risk when the scar was above the CIC and the placenta was low-lying (i.e. when the placenta was overlying an exposed scar) and low risk when the scar was within the CIC and/or the placenta was high. High-risk patients were followed up at 20 weeks and 28-30 weeks for the development of PAS. Maternal demographics, detailed obstetric history and obstetric outcome were collected. First-trimester transvaginal ultrasound was offered to 535 women with prior CS during the study period. A LUS scar was visualized in 79.9% (401/502) of those who agreed to undergo the examination. At this scan, the LUS scar was above the CIC in 9.0% (36/401) of women, but only 5.7% (23/401) additionally had a low-lying placenta overlying the scar. Of these 23 high-risk women, two were found to have PAS on the mid-trimester screening scan and one was noted to have placental adherence during evacuation following mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. On the first-trimester scan, 94.3% (378/401) of women were at low risk of PAS. This screening protocol yielded a positive likelihood ratio of 21.33 (95% CI, 13.02-34.96), sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 29.24-100%), specificity of 95.31% (95% CI, 92.39-97.35%), positive predictive value of 16.7% (95% CI, 5.8-39.2%) and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 98.4-100%). On multivariable regression analysis performed to identify confounding variables associated with a LUS scar above the CIC, only maternal body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 was significant (odds ratio (OR), 2.42 (95% CI, 1.04-5.39); P = 0.03). Although there was a trend towards an increased risk of a LUS scar above the CIC in women with prior elective prelabor CS (OR, 1.72 (95% CI, 0.80-3.68)), this association did not reach statistical significance. Routine transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the location of the LUS scar and placenta at the time of first-trimester screening between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks' gestation in women with prior CS is a feasible and effective tool to identify those at risk of subsequent development of PAS disorder. A finding of placental implantation over an exposed LUS scar seems to be cardinal in predicting the risk of PAS disorder in women with prior CS, with an excellent negative predictive value. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Bhatia A ，Palacio M ，Wright AM ，Yeo GSH ... -  《-》