S100A4 Knockout Sensitizes Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma Cells Harboring BRAFV600E/Mt to Vemurafenib.
Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), with 25% BRAFV600E mutation, is one of the most lethal human malignancies that currently has no effective therapy. Vemurafenib, a BRAFV600E inhibitor, has shown promise in clinical trials, including ATC patients, but is being hampered by the acquisition of drug resistance. Therefore, combination therapy that includes BRAFV600E inhibition and avoids resistance is a clinical need.
ATC cell lines 8505C (BRAFV600E/mt), SW1736 (BRAFV600E/mt), KAT18 (BRAFV600E/wt) and Cal-62(BRAFV600E/wt) cells were used in the study. The ability of S100A knockout or /and in combination with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib on growth, apoptosis, invasion and apoptosis in ATC cells in vitro was demonstrated by MTT and BrdUrd incorporation assay, Annexin-V-FITC staining analyzed by flow cytometry, Transwell migration and Matrigel invasion assay. S100A4,pERK1/2, pAKT and pROCK1/2 protein was detected by western blot assay; Small molecule inhibitors of Y27632, U0126, MK-2206 and constitutively active forms of pCDNA-Myc-pERK, pCMV6-HA-Akt, pCMV-RhoA were employed, and the mechanistic studies were performed. We assessed the efficiency of in vivo combination treatment with S100A4 knockout and Vemurafenib on tumors.
S100A4 knockout induced apoptosis and reduced proliferation by inactivation of pAKT and pERK signals, and inhibited invasion and migration by inactivation of pAKT and RhoA/ROCK1/2 signals in 8505C or Cal-62 cells in vitro, and vice versa in SW1736 and KAT18 cells. Vemurafenib did not affect apoptosis of both 8505C and SW1736 cells, but reduced proliferation via arresting cell cycle, and promoted cell migration and invasion in vitro. Combination treatment with S100A4 knockdown and vemurafenib reduced cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro compared to the S100A4 knockdown or Vemurafenib alone. Vemurafenib treatment resulted in a transient inhibition of pERK expression and gradually activation of pAKT expression, but quickly recovery from ERK1/2 activation inhibition by vemurafenib treatment in 4 h for SW1736 and 8505C cells. Combined treatment completely inhibited ERK1/2 and AKT activation during 48 h. In an in vivo mouse model of SW1736 and 8505C, vemurafenib treatment alone did not significantly inhibit tumor growth in both of the tumors, but inhibited tumor growth in combined groups.
Our results show S100A4 knockout alone inhibits ATC cells (rich endogenous S100A4) survival and invasion, regardless of the BRAFV600E status, and potentiates the effect of vemurafenib on tumor regression in vitro and in vivo. In addition, S100A4 knockout potently inhibits the recovery from ERK1/2 activation inhibition and the AKT activation following vemurafenib treatment and reversed the vemurafenib resistance. This therapeutic combination may be of benefit in patients with ATC.
Jiao X
,Zhang H
,Xu X
,Yu Y
,Zhang H
,Zhang J
,Ning L
,Hao F
,Liu X
,Niu M
,Chen CT
,Chen D
,Zhang K
... -
《-》
Targeting PEAK1 sensitizes anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells harboring BRAF(V600E) to Vemurafenib by Bim upregulation.
Pseudopodium-enriched atypical kinase 1 (PEAK1) has been demonstrated to be upregulated in human malignancies and cells. Enhanced PEAK1 expression facilitates tumor cell survival and chemoresistance. However, the role of PEAK1 inhibition to anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cell (ATC) and vemurafenib resistance is still unknown. Here, we observed that targeting PEAK1 inhibited cell viability and colony formation, but not cell apoptosis in both of the 8505C and Hth74 cells in vitro. Targeting PEAK1 sensitized 8505C and Hth74 cells to vemurafenib by inducing cell apoptosis, and thereby decreasing cell viability. Mechanistically, vemurafenib treatment upregulated PEAK1 expression. Combined PEAK1 depletion and Vemurafenib treatment upregulated Bim expression. Targeting PEAK1 sensitized vemurafenib-induced apoptosis by upregulating Bim. In conclusion, vemurafenib resistance in ATC cells harboring BRAFV600E is associated with PEAK1 activation, resulting in the inhibition of pro-apoptotic Bim protein. Therefore, targeting PEAK1 may be an effective strategy to sensitize ATC harboring BRAFV600E to vemurafenib.
Wang Q
,Hao F
,Ning L
,Sun C
... -
《-》
Bortezomib sensitizes thyroid cancer to BRAF inhibitor in vitro and in vivo.
Although overall survival rate for patients with thyroid cancer (TC) is high, there is an alarming 10-year recurrence rate of up to 30% conferring a ~50% survival among these high-risk patients. The BRAFV600E mutation is estimated to be present in over 50% of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) cases besides being associated with carcinogenesis and poor prognosis. We assessed the status of NF-κB, Ki-67, cyclin D1 and BRAFV600E in TC tissues and TC cell lines using immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. Concurrently, we evaluated the outcomes of combined targeting of the proteasome pathway in addition to selective BRAF inhibitors in cases of PTC. In this study, BRAFV600E-bearing TC cells were treated with BRAFV600E inhibitor, Vemurafenib alone or in combination with the proteasome inhibitor, Bortezomib. The combination of both drugs showed synergistic effects as evidenced by cell growth inhibition (P < 0.05), increased G2-phase cell cycle arrest and induced apoptosis (P < 0.05). In our TC xenograft model, the combination of Vemurafenib and Bortezomib significantly reduced tumor size (P < 0.05) and expression of the markers of cell growth and proliferation, Ki-67 and cyclin D1 (P < 0.001), when compared to monotherapy. Further analysis demonstrated that treatment with Bortezomib sensitized TC cells to Vemurafenib via mitochondrial dysregulation and apoptosis of TC cells, as evidenced by the increase in the expression of p53, Noxa protein, the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, cytochrome c release and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage. Our results demonstrate a strong clinical potential for the combination of the Bortezomib and the BRAF inhibitor Vemurafenib as an efficient therapeutic approach for the treatment of TC.
Tsumagari K
,Abd Elmageed ZY
,Sholl AB
,Green EA
,Sobti S
,Khan AR
,Kandil A
,Murad F
,Friedlander P
,Boulares AH
,Kandil E
... -
《-》