Clinical Outcome for Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Neuroma With a Processed Nerve Allograft: Results of a Small Prospective Case Series.

Processed nerve allografts are used increasingly in the treatment of traumatic neuroma in small sensory nerves. The goal of the present study was to investigate the use of an allograft after different intervals between injury and repair and to analyze results, not only for the success of pain relief, but also for potential recovery of sensation in time. Four patients with painful neuroma in small sensory nerves in the lower extremity were surgically treated with a decellularized allograft. Patients were followed prospectively for at least 1 y. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Likert scale. Recovery of sensation was tested using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. In all 4 cases an allograft of 3-cm was used to reconstruct a defect in the superficial peroneal (3) or sural nerve (1) after excision of the neuroma. Complete relief of pain symptoms was achieved in 2 patients: 1 case concerned the reconstruction of a neuroma with an interval of less than 1 y between injury and repair and 1 case a neuroma-in-continuity. Sensation recovered completely in these 2 cases. In the other 2 cases, that had an interval between injury and reconstruction of more than 1 y, there was neither successful pain relief nor recovery of sensation. This prospective study shows that processed nerve allografts can be successful for the reconstruction of small sensory nerves after excision of the traumatic neuroma both for recovery of pain and sensation, but in this small case series only if the interval between injury and reconstruction was <1 y.

Bolleboom A ，Boer K ，de Ruiter GCW 《-》

Treatment of Foot and Ankle Neuroma Pain With Processed Nerve Allografts.

Localized nerve pain in the foot and ankle can be a chronic source of disability after trauma and has been identified as the most common complication following operative interventions in the foot and ankle. The superficial location of the injured nerves and lack of suitable tissue for nerve implantation make this pain refractory to conventional methods of neuroma management. We describe a novel strategy for management using processed nerve allografts to bridge nerve gaps created by resection of both end neuromas and neuromas-in-continuity. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed of all patients who received a processed nerve allograft for treatment of painful neuromas in the foot and ankle between May 2010 and June 2015. Patient demographic and operative information was obtained, as well as preoperative and postoperative pain assessments using a conventional ordinal scale and PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Behavior and Pain Interference assessments. Twenty-two patients were identified, with postoperative pain assessments occurring at a mean of 15.5 months after surgery. Neuromas of the sural and superficial peroneal nerves were the most common diagnoses, with 3-cm nerve allografts being used as the interposition graft in the majority of cases. Eight patients had end neuromas and 18 patients had neuromas in continuity. Analysis of paired data demonstrated a mean ordinal pain score decrease of 2.6, with 24 and 31 percentage-point decreases in PROMIS Pain Behavior and Pain Interference measures, respectively. All changes were significant (P < .002). The painful sequelae of superficial nerve injuries in the foot and ankle was significantly improved with complete excision of the involved nerve segment followed by bridging of the resulting nerve gap with a processed nerve allograft. This approach limits surgery to the site of injury and reconstitutes the peripheral nerve anatomy. Level IV, retrospective case series.

Souza JM ，Purnell CA ，Cheesborough JE ，Kelikian AS ，Dumanian GA ... -  《-》

Treatment of Painful Lower Extremity Neuromas with Processed Nerve Allograft.

Rambau GM ，Victoria C ，Hayden ME ，Day J ，Ellis SJ ，Lee SK ... -  《-》

Superficial Peroneal Nerve to Deep Peroneal Nerve Transfer With Allograft Conduit for Neuroma in Continuity.

The anterior approach to the ankle for surgery can result in injury to the superficial peroneal nerve, resulting in a painful neuroma and significant patient morbidity. A paucity of data is available evaluating the role of the superficial peroneal nerve to deep peroneal nerve transfer as a method of treatment of neuromas in continuity after ankle arthrodesis. We describe 11 patients who underwent nerve transfer with nerve allograft and conduit repair to treat recalcitrant painful neuromas after ankle arthrodesis. At a mean follow-up period of 31 months, the mean visual analog pain scale score had improved from 7.9 preoperatively to 2.45 postoperatively (p < .0001). These data suggest that nerve transfer with a nerve allograft can provide significant clinical improvement for painful neuromas of the peripheral nerves at the ankle.

Bibbo C ，Rodrigues-Colazzo E ，Finzen AG 《-》

Retrospective review of microsurgical repair of 222 lingual nerve injuries.

Injury to the lingual nerve (LN) is a known complication associated with several oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures. We have reviewed the demographics, timing, and outcome of microsurgical repair of the LN. A retrospective chart review was completed of all patients who had undergone microsurgical repair of the LN by one of us (R.A.M.) from March 1986 through December 2005. A physical examination, including standardized neurosensory testing, was completed of each patient preoperatively. All patients were followed up periodically after surgery for at least 1 year, with neurosensory testing repeated at each visit. Sensory recovery was determined from the patient's final neurosensory testing results and evaluated using the guidelines established by the Medical Research Council Scale. The following data were collected and analyzed: patient age, gender, nerve injury etiology, chief sensory complaint (numbness or pain, or both), interval from injury to surgical intervention, intraoperative findings, surgical procedure, and neurosensory status at the final evaluation. The patients were classified according to whether they achieved "useful sensory recovery" or better, according to the Medical Research Council Scale, or had unsatisfactory or no improvement in sensation. Logistic regression methods and associated odds ratios (OR) were used to quantify the association between the risk factors and improvement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to find the age threshold and duration that maximally separated the patient outcomes. A total of 222 patients (51 males and 171 females; average age 31.1 years, range 15 to 61) underwent LN repair and returned for at least 1 year of follow-up. The most common cause of LN injury was mandibular third molar removal (n = 191, 86%), followed by sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy (n = 14, 6.3%). Most patients complained preoperatively of numbness (n = 122, 55%) or numbness with pain (n = 94, 42.3%). The average interval from injury to surgery was 8.5 months (range 1.5 to 96). The most commonly performed operation was excision of a proximal stump neuroma with neurorrhaphy (n = 154, 69%), followed by external decompression with internal neurolysis (n = 29, 13%). Nineteen patients (8.6%) underwent an autogenous nerve graft procedure (greater auricular or sural nerve) for reconstruction of a nerve gap. A collagen cuff was placed around the repair site in 8 patients (3.6%; external decompression with internal neurolysis in 2 and neurorrhaphy in 6). Recovery from neurosensory dysfunction (defined by the Medical Research Council Scale as ranging from "useful sensory function" to a "complete return of sensation") was observed in 201 patients (90.5%; 146 patients with complete recovery and 55 patients with recovery to "useful sensory function"), and 21 patients (9.5%) had no or inadequate improvement. Using the logistic regression model, a shorter interval between nerve injury and repair resulted in greater odds of improvement (OR 0.942, P = .0064); with each month that passed, the odds of improvement decreased by 5.8%. The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that patients who waited more than 9 months for repair were at a significantly greater risk of nonimprovement. Statistical significance was observed between patient age and outcome (OR 0.945, P = .0067) representing a 5.5% decrease in the chance of recovery for every year of age in patients 45 years old and older. The odds of a return of acceptable neurosensory function were better when the patient's presenting symptom was pain and not numbness (OR 0.04, P < .001). Microsurgical repair of LN injury has the best chance of successful restoration of acceptable neurosensory function if done within 9 months of the injury. The likelihood of recovery after nerve repair decreased progressively when the repair occurred more than 9 months after injury and with increasing patient age.

Bagheri SC ，Meyer RA ，Khan HA ，Kuhmichel A ，Steed MB ... -  《-》